Self-care towards the end of life: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on access, quality and cost.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Joshua Gallagher, Bárbara Antunes, James Sutton, Isla Kuhn, Michael P Kelly, Robbie Duschinsky, Stephen Barclay
{"title":"Self-care towards the end of life: A systematic review and narrative synthesis on access, quality and cost.","authors":"Joshua Gallagher, Bárbara Antunes, James Sutton, Isla Kuhn, Michael P Kelly, Robbie Duschinsky, Stephen Barclay","doi":"10.1177/02692163241286110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Policy and practice encourages patients to engage in self-care, with individual patient management and remote monitoring of disease. Much is known of the moderate stage of chronic disease, without a clear understanding of how self-care applies towards the end of life.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review the current evidence on practices of self-care in life-limiting conditions and its impacts on healthcare utilisation, quality of life and associated costs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We systematically searched 10 scientific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts and Health Management Information Consortium) from inception to October 2023 with citation and hand searching. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, with quality and relevance assessed using Gough's Weight of Evidence framework. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by three researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from 33 studies revealed self-care as increasingly burdensome or unfeasible towards the end of life, with patients delaying use of professional care. Self-care became increasingly burdensome for patients, carers and professionals as illness progressed. Self-monitoring may exacerbate hospitalisations as patients delayed seeking professional help until crises arose. Findings regarding quality were inconclusive, with some evidence suggesting that self-care can decrease care costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review has shown that research on self-care is an evolving area of study, with a current focus on acute care and hospitalisations. Future research should seek to provide a more complete account of the relation between self-care and non-acute care use, and quality, with further efforts to study self-care costs incurred through self-funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2692163241286110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241286110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Policy and practice encourages patients to engage in self-care, with individual patient management and remote monitoring of disease. Much is known of the moderate stage of chronic disease, without a clear understanding of how self-care applies towards the end of life.

Aim: To review the current evidence on practices of self-care in life-limiting conditions and its impacts on healthcare utilisation, quality of life and associated costs.

Design: We systematically searched 10 scientific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts and Health Management Information Consortium) from inception to October 2023 with citation and hand searching. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, with quality and relevance assessed using Gough's Weight of Evidence framework. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by three researchers.

Results: Findings from 33 studies revealed self-care as increasingly burdensome or unfeasible towards the end of life, with patients delaying use of professional care. Self-care became increasingly burdensome for patients, carers and professionals as illness progressed. Self-monitoring may exacerbate hospitalisations as patients delayed seeking professional help until crises arose. Findings regarding quality were inconclusive, with some evidence suggesting that self-care can decrease care costs.

Conclusions: This review has shown that research on self-care is an evolving area of study, with a current focus on acute care and hospitalisations. Future research should seek to provide a more complete account of the relation between self-care and non-acute care use, and quality, with further efforts to study self-care costs incurred through self-funding.

临终前的自我护理:关于获取、质量和成本的系统综述和叙述性综述。
背景:政策和实践鼓励患者进行自我护理,对患者进行个人管理和远程疾病监测。我们对慢性病的中期阶段了解甚多,但对生命末期自我护理的应用情况却不甚了解。目的:回顾目前有关在限制生命的情况下自我护理的实践及其对医疗保健利用率、生活质量和相关成本的影响的证据:设计:我们系统地检索了 10 个科学数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane Central、Cochrane 系统性综述数据库、Scopus、社会学文摘、社会工作文摘和健康管理信息联合会),检索时间从开始到 2023 年 10 月,并进行了引文和人工检索。采用 Gough 的 "证据权重"(Weight of Evidence)框架进行质量和相关性评估,并进行了叙述性综合。标题和摘要由三名研究人员独立筛选:来自 33 项研究的结果表明,临近生命终点时,自我护理的负担越来越重或越来越不可行,患者会推迟使用专业护理。随着病情的发展,自我护理对患者、护理人员和专业人员来说负担越来越重。自我监控可能会加剧住院治疗,因为患者会延迟寻求专业帮助,直到危机出现。有关质量的研究结果尚无定论,但有一些证据表明,自我护理可以降低护理成本:本综述表明,有关自我护理的研究是一个不断发展的研究领域,目前的重点是急性护理和住院治疗。未来的研究应力求更全面地阐述自我护理与非急性护理的使用和质量之间的关系,并进一步努力研究通过自费产生的自我护理费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信