A rapid review of the evidence for online interventions for bereavement support.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anne Finucane, Anne Canny, Ally Pax Arcari Mair, Emily Harrop, Lucy E Selman, Brooke Swash, Donna Wakefield, David Gillanders
{"title":"A rapid review of the evidence for online interventions for bereavement support.","authors":"Anne Finucane, Anne Canny, Ally Pax Arcari Mair, Emily Harrop, Lucy E Selman, Brooke Swash, Donna Wakefield, David Gillanders","doi":"10.1177/02692163241285101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Grieving is a natural process, and many people adjust with support from family and friends. Around 40% of people would benefit from additional input. Online bereavement support interventions may increase access to support. Evidence regarding their acceptability and effectiveness is emerging but needs to be synthesised.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesise evidence on the feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, impacts and implementation of online interventions to improve wellbeing, coping and quality of life after bereavement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A rapid review of evidence regarding online bereavement support. We appraised study quality using AMSTAR 2 and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>English language articles published 1 January 2010 to 4 January 2024, using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and APA PsycINFO. Eligible articles examined formal and informal online interventions to improve bereavement outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 2050 articles by title and abstract. Four systematic reviews and 35 individual studies were included. Online bereavement support was feasible, acceptable and effective in reducing grief intensity, stress-related outcomes and depression. Where reported, participant retention was typically >70%. Positive impacts included: access to a supportive community at any time, reduced isolation; opportunities to process feelings; normalisation of loss responses; access to coping advice and opportunities for meaning-making and remembrance. Negative impacts included upset due to insensitive comments from others via unmoderated online forums.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online interventions can widen access to acceptable, effective bereavement support and improve outcomes for bereaved people. National policies and clinical guidelines relating to bereavement support need to be updated to take account of online formats.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2692163241285101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241285101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Grieving is a natural process, and many people adjust with support from family and friends. Around 40% of people would benefit from additional input. Online bereavement support interventions may increase access to support. Evidence regarding their acceptability and effectiveness is emerging but needs to be synthesised.

Aim: To synthesise evidence on the feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, impacts and implementation of online interventions to improve wellbeing, coping and quality of life after bereavement.

Design: A rapid review of evidence regarding online bereavement support. We appraised study quality using AMSTAR 2 and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Data sources: English language articles published 1 January 2010 to 4 January 2024, using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and APA PsycINFO. Eligible articles examined formal and informal online interventions to improve bereavement outcomes.

Results: We screened 2050 articles by title and abstract. Four systematic reviews and 35 individual studies were included. Online bereavement support was feasible, acceptable and effective in reducing grief intensity, stress-related outcomes and depression. Where reported, participant retention was typically >70%. Positive impacts included: access to a supportive community at any time, reduced isolation; opportunities to process feelings; normalisation of loss responses; access to coping advice and opportunities for meaning-making and remembrance. Negative impacts included upset due to insensitive comments from others via unmoderated online forums.

Conclusion: Online interventions can widen access to acceptable, effective bereavement support and improve outcomes for bereaved people. National policies and clinical guidelines relating to bereavement support need to be updated to take account of online formats.

丧亲支持在线干预证据快速审查。
背景介绍哀伤是一个自然的过程,许多人都会在家人和朋友的支持下进行调整。大约 40% 的人会从额外的支持中受益。在线丧亲支持干预可以增加获得支持的机会。目的:综合有关在线干预措施的可行性、可接受性、有效性、影响和实施情况的证据,以改善丧亲后的福祉、应对能力和生活质量:设计:快速回顾有关在线丧亲支持的证据。我们使用 AMSTAR 2 和混合方法评估工具对研究质量进行了评估:使用 Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase 和 APA PsycINFO 对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 4 日发表的英文文章进行检索。符合条件的文章研究了旨在改善丧亲之痛结果的正式和非正式在线干预措施:我们通过标题和摘要筛选了 2050 篇文章。其中包括 4 篇系统综述和 35 项个人研究。在线丧亲支持在降低悲伤强度、压力相关结果和抑郁方面是可行的、可接受的和有效的。据报道,参与者保留率通常大于 70%。积极影响包括:可随时进入支持性社区,减少孤独感;有机会处理情感;丧亲反应正常化;可获得应对建议以及创造意义和纪念的机会。负面影响包括因他人通过未经管理的在线论坛发表麻木不仁的评论而引起的不安:在线干预可以扩大获得可接受的、有效的丧亲支持的途径,并改善丧亲者的结果。有关丧亲支持的国家政策和临床指南需要更新,以考虑到在线形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信