UK national survey on nuclear medicine in-house clinical software: the calm before the storm.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anthony W Murray, James W Scuffham, John C Dickson, Matthew Memmott
{"title":"UK national survey on nuclear medicine in-house clinical software: the calm before the storm.","authors":"Anthony W Murray, James W Scuffham, John C Dickson, Matthew Memmott","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of in-house developed software as a medical device (IHD-SaMD) is core to many nuclear medicine (NM) services in the UK, including applications in nonimaging studies and image processing. Expected regulatory changes in 2025 could have significant implications due to a lack of resources and expertise in the implementation and maintenance of software Quality Management Systems (QMS) and associated standards. This survey investigated the national use of IHD-SaMD and the readiness of services to adapt to the upcoming regulatory changes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey was used to investigate the current national usage of IHD-SaMD. Representatives of 64 UK NM physics services were invited to participate, with 43 responding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that 98% of respondents use IHD-SaMD clinically. About 65% use IHD-SaMD that respondents felt was under-supported (e.g. legacy software). Approximately 60% of respondents use or support two or more pieces of IHD-SaMD. Around 66% of respondents use a QMS in their department, with about 48% using a software-specific QMS. Most respondents indicate understaffing, particularly with regard to IT/software skillsets. Almost all respondents indicate without an increase in the preparedness and understanding of the requirements, all dependent clinical services would be severely impacted or indeed stopped.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This national survey shows that pending regulatory changes could significantly impact NM services, up to and including stopping clinical services. Additional resources would be required to support in-house software management under an appropriate QMS or move to European conformity marking (CE)-marked software where available. This must be urgently considered and addressed by all NM stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of in-house developed software as a medical device (IHD-SaMD) is core to many nuclear medicine (NM) services in the UK, including applications in nonimaging studies and image processing. Expected regulatory changes in 2025 could have significant implications due to a lack of resources and expertise in the implementation and maintenance of software Quality Management Systems (QMS) and associated standards. This survey investigated the national use of IHD-SaMD and the readiness of services to adapt to the upcoming regulatory changes.

Method: An online survey was used to investigate the current national usage of IHD-SaMD. Representatives of 64 UK NM physics services were invited to participate, with 43 responding.

Results: It was found that 98% of respondents use IHD-SaMD clinically. About 65% use IHD-SaMD that respondents felt was under-supported (e.g. legacy software). Approximately 60% of respondents use or support two or more pieces of IHD-SaMD. Around 66% of respondents use a QMS in their department, with about 48% using a software-specific QMS. Most respondents indicate understaffing, particularly with regard to IT/software skillsets. Almost all respondents indicate without an increase in the preparedness and understanding of the requirements, all dependent clinical services would be severely impacted or indeed stopped.

Conclusion: This national survey shows that pending regulatory changes could significantly impact NM services, up to and including stopping clinical services. Additional resources would be required to support in-house software management under an appropriate QMS or move to European conformity marking (CE)-marked software where available. This must be urgently considered and addressed by all NM stakeholders.

英国核医学内部临床软件全国调查:暴风雨前的宁静。
简介:使用内部开发的软件作为医疗设备(IHD-SaMD)是英国许多核医学(NM)服务的核心,包括在非成像研究和图像处理中的应用。由于缺乏实施和维护软件质量管理系统 (QMS) 及相关标准的资源和专业知识,预计 2025 年的监管变化可能会产生重大影响。本调查旨在了解 IHD-SaMD 在国内的使用情况,以及各服务机构为适应即将到来的监管变化所做的准备情况:方法: 采用在线调查的方式调查 IHD-SaMD 目前在全国的使用情况。英国 64 家 NM 物理服务机构的代表应邀参加了调查,其中 43 家做出了回应:结果发现,98% 的受访者在临床上使用 IHD-SaMD。约 65% 的受访者认为所使用的 IHD-SaMD 支持不足(如传统软件)。约 60% 的受访者使用或支持两种或两种以上的 IHD-SaMD。约 66% 的受访者在本部门使用质量管理系统,其中约 48% 使用特定软件的质量管理系统。大多数受访者表示人手不足,尤其是在信息技术/软件技能方面。几乎所有受访者都表示,如果不加强准备工作和对要求的理解,所有依赖性临床服务都将受到严重影响,甚至停止:这项全国性调查显示,待定的监管变化可能会严重影响 NM 服务,甚至停止临床服务。需要额外的资源来支持在适当的质量管理体系下进行内部软件管理,或在有条件的情况下转用欧洲合格标志(CE)软件。所有非传染性疾病的利益相关者都必须紧急考虑并解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信