Overloaded Vertebral Body Following Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery Comparing with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1111/os.14242
Shi-Hao Chen, Ya-Ling Li, Hao Liu, Ting-Kui Wu, Kang-Kang Huang, Ming-He Yao, Bei-Yu Wang
{"title":"Overloaded Vertebral Body Following Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery Comparing with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.","authors":"Shi-Hao Chen, Ya-Ling Li, Hao Liu, Ting-Kui Wu, Kang-Kang Huang, Ming-He Yao, Bei-Yu Wang","doi":"10.1111/os.14242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on the varying number and relative positions of cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures, three-segment hybrid surgery (HS) presents a diverse structural approach. Currently, the potential differential effects of HS with different segment combinations and surgical procedures on overloaded vertebral body (OVB) occurrence remain unexplored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of HS and ACDF in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD), aiming to provide further insights into OVB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients with three-level CDDD who underwent ACDF or HS at our institution. Eligible patients were divided into three groups: Type I (one-level CDR and two-level ACDF), Type II (two-level CDR and one-level ACDF), and ACDF (three-level ACDF). For radiographic analysis, patients were further divided into the Replacement Segment Group and the Nonreplacement Segment Group based on the presence of replacement segments above and below the OVB. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and neck disability index (NDI) scores. The cervical radiological parameters assessed included (1) vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA), (2) wedge angle (WA), (3) anterior vertebral height (AH), (4) posterior vertebral height (PH), and (5) Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Statistical methods included paired t-test, ANOVA test, and chi-square test. Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the differences between two groups according to the results of normal distribution test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients, evenly distributed among three groups, were included and were well matched in terms of demographic characteristics. The likelihood of vertebral body collapse (VBC) was notably higher in the ACDF group (41.5%) compared with the Type I (17.9%) and Type II (8.9%) groups (p < 0.01). Following surgery, both at 3 and 6 months, the ACDF group demonstrated higher VAS neck scores and NDI scores compared with the Type I and Type II groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, the WA and AH values of the upper and lower adjacent OVB were consistently lower in the ACDF group than in the Type I and Type II groups at 6 and 12 months and at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). Notably, in the Nonreplacement Segment Group, WA significantly decreased at 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up compared with the Replacement Segment Group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three levels of HS appear to reduce stress concentrations and alleviate morphological changes in OVB. The occurrence of more VBC patients with OVB was associated with the use of Zero-P or Zero-P VA implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"3036-3046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Based on the varying number and relative positions of cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures, three-segment hybrid surgery (HS) presents a diverse structural approach. Currently, the potential differential effects of HS with different segment combinations and surgical procedures on overloaded vertebral body (OVB) occurrence remain unexplored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of HS and ACDF in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD), aiming to provide further insights into OVB.

Methods: This study included patients with three-level CDDD who underwent ACDF or HS at our institution. Eligible patients were divided into three groups: Type I (one-level CDR and two-level ACDF), Type II (two-level CDR and one-level ACDF), and ACDF (three-level ACDF). For radiographic analysis, patients were further divided into the Replacement Segment Group and the Nonreplacement Segment Group based on the presence of replacement segments above and below the OVB. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and neck disability index (NDI) scores. The cervical radiological parameters assessed included (1) vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA), (2) wedge angle (WA), (3) anterior vertebral height (AH), (4) posterior vertebral height (PH), and (5) Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Statistical methods included paired t-test, ANOVA test, and chi-square test. Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the differences between two groups according to the results of normal distribution test.

Results: A total of 123 patients, evenly distributed among three groups, were included and were well matched in terms of demographic characteristics. The likelihood of vertebral body collapse (VBC) was notably higher in the ACDF group (41.5%) compared with the Type I (17.9%) and Type II (8.9%) groups (p < 0.01). Following surgery, both at 3 and 6 months, the ACDF group demonstrated higher VAS neck scores and NDI scores compared with the Type I and Type II groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, the WA and AH values of the upper and lower adjacent OVB were consistently lower in the ACDF group than in the Type I and Type II groups at 6 and 12 months and at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). Notably, in the Nonreplacement Segment Group, WA significantly decreased at 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up compared with the Replacement Segment Group (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Three levels of HS appear to reduce stress concentrations and alleviate morphological changes in OVB. The occurrence of more VBC patients with OVB was associated with the use of Zero-P or Zero-P VA implants.

连续三层混合手术与前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术的椎体过载比较。
目的:基于颈椎间盘置换术(CDR)和颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的不同数量和相对位置,三节段混合手术(HS)呈现出多样化的结构方式。目前,采用不同节段组合和手术方法的三节段混合手术(HS)对椎体过载(OVB)发生的潜在不同影响仍未得到探讨。本回顾性研究的目的是比较HS和ACDF治疗颈椎间盘退行性病变(CDDD)的临床和放射学结果,旨在进一步了解OVB:本研究纳入了在我院接受 ACDF 或 HS 治疗的三水平 CDDD 患者。符合条件的患者分为三组:I型(一级CDR和二级ACDF)、II型(二级CDR和一级ACDF)和ACDF(三级ACDF)。在放射学分析中,根据 OVB 上下是否存在置换节段,将患者进一步分为置换节段组和非置换节段组。临床结果采用颈部和手臂疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分进行评估。评估的颈椎放射学参数包括:(1)椎体横截面积(CSA);(2)楔角(WA);(3)椎体前高度(AH);(4)椎体后高度(PH);(5)Hounsfield 单位(HU)值。统计方法包括配对 t 检验、方差分析检验和卡方检验。根据正态分布检验结果,采用独立样本 t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较两组间的差异:共纳入 123 名患者,平均分布在三个组别中。与Ⅰ型组(17.9%)和Ⅱ型组(8.9%)相比,ACDF 组发生椎体塌陷(VBC)的几率明显更高(P 结论:三个水平的 HS 似乎能减少应力对椎体塌陷的影响:三种水平的 HS 似乎可降低应力集中度,缓解 OVB 的形态学变化。更多的 VBC 患者出现 OVB 与使用零 P 或零 P VA 种植体有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信