Heart failure and major haemorrhage in people with atrial fibrillation.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nicholas R Jones, Margaret Smith, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Yaling Yang, Fd Richard Hobbs, Clare J Taylor
{"title":"Heart failure and major haemorrhage in people with atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Nicholas R Jones, Margaret Smith, Sarah Lay-Flurrie, Yaling Yang, Fd Richard Hobbs, Clare J Taylor","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is not included in atrial fibrillation (AF) bleeding risk prediction scores, reflecting uncertainty regarding its importance as a risk factor for major haemorrhage. We aimed to report the relative risk of first major haemorrhage in people with HF and AF compared with people with AF without HF ('AF only').</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>English primary care cohort study of 2 178 162 people aged ≥45 years in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from January 2000 to December 2018, linked to secondary care and mortality databases. We used traditional survival analysis and competing risks methods, accounting for all-cause mortality and anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 7.56 years median follow-up, 60 270 people were diagnosed with HF and AF of whom 4996 (8.3%) had a major haemorrhage and 36 170 died (60.0%), compared with 8256 (6.4%) and 34 375 (27.2%), respectively, among 126 251 people with AF only. Less than half those with AF were prescribed an anticoagulant (45.6% from 2014 onwards), although 75.7% were prescribed an antiplatelet or anticoagulant. In a fully adjusted Cox model, the HR for major haemorrhage was higher among people with HF and AF (2.52, 95% CI 2.44 to 2.61) than AF only (1.87, 95% CI 1.82 to 1.92), even in a subgroup analysis of people prescribed anticoagulation. However, in a Fine and Gray competing risk model, the HR of major haemorrhage was similar for people with AF only (1.82, 95% CI 1.77 to 1.87) or HF and AF (1.71, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with HF and AF are at increased risk of major haemorrhage compared with those with AF only and current prediction scores may underestimate the risk of haemorrhage in HF and AF. However, people with HF and AF are more likely to die than have a major haemorrhage and therefore an individual's expected prognosis should be carefully considered when predicting future bleeding risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is not included in atrial fibrillation (AF) bleeding risk prediction scores, reflecting uncertainty regarding its importance as a risk factor for major haemorrhage. We aimed to report the relative risk of first major haemorrhage in people with HF and AF compared with people with AF without HF ('AF only').

Methods: English primary care cohort study of 2 178 162 people aged ≥45 years in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from January 2000 to December 2018, linked to secondary care and mortality databases. We used traditional survival analysis and competing risks methods, accounting for all-cause mortality and anticoagulation.

Results: Over 7.56 years median follow-up, 60 270 people were diagnosed with HF and AF of whom 4996 (8.3%) had a major haemorrhage and 36 170 died (60.0%), compared with 8256 (6.4%) and 34 375 (27.2%), respectively, among 126 251 people with AF only. Less than half those with AF were prescribed an anticoagulant (45.6% from 2014 onwards), although 75.7% were prescribed an antiplatelet or anticoagulant. In a fully adjusted Cox model, the HR for major haemorrhage was higher among people with HF and AF (2.52, 95% CI 2.44 to 2.61) than AF only (1.87, 95% CI 1.82 to 1.92), even in a subgroup analysis of people prescribed anticoagulation. However, in a Fine and Gray competing risk model, the HR of major haemorrhage was similar for people with AF only (1.82, 95% CI 1.77 to 1.87) or HF and AF (1.71, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.78).

Conclusions: People with HF and AF are at increased risk of major haemorrhage compared with those with AF only and current prediction scores may underestimate the risk of haemorrhage in HF and AF. However, people with HF and AF are more likely to die than have a major haemorrhage and therefore an individual's expected prognosis should be carefully considered when predicting future bleeding risk.

心房颤动患者的心力衰竭和大出血。
背景:心力衰竭(HF)未被纳入心房颤动(AF)出血风险预测评分,这反映出其作为大出血风险因素的重要性尚不确定。我们旨在报告心房颤动合并高血压患者与心房颤动合并高血压患者("仅心房颤动")首次大出血的相对风险:2000年1月至2018年12月期间,在临床实践研究数据链中对2 178 162名年龄≥45岁的人进行了英国初级保健队列研究,并与二级保健和死亡率数据库相连接。我们采用了传统的生存分析和竞争风险方法,并考虑了全因死亡率和抗凝问题:在7.56年的中位随访中,有60 270人被诊断出患有高血压和房颤,其中4996人(8.3%)发生大出血,36 170人死亡(60.0%),而仅患有房颤的126 251人中分别有8256人(6.4%)和34 375人(27.2%)发生大出血和死亡。心房颤动患者中只有不到一半的人开具了抗凝药处方(自2014年起为45.6%),但有75.7%的人开具了抗血小板或抗凝药处方。在完全调整后的 Cox 模型中,即使是在抗凝处方的亚组分析中,心房颤动合并心房颤动患者的大出血 HR(2.52,95% CI 2.44 至 2.61)也高于仅合并心房颤动患者(1.87,95% CI 1.82 至 1.92)。然而,在Fine和Gray竞争风险模型中,仅有心房颤动者(1.82,95% CI 1.77至1.87)或心房颤动合并心房颤动者(1.71,95% CI 1.66至1.78)的大出血HR相似:与仅有心房颤动的患者相比,心房颤动合并心房颤动的患者发生大出血的风险更高,目前的预测评分可能低估了心房颤动合并心房颤动的患者发生大出血的风险。然而,心房颤动合并心房颤动患者死亡的可能性要大于大出血,因此在预测未来出血风险时应仔细考虑个人的预期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信