Sarah E Daly, Jingzhang Feng, Devin Daeschel, Jasna Kovac, Abigail B Snyder
{"title":"The choice of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis impacted characterization of highly variable surface microbiota in dairy processing environments.","authors":"Sarah E Daly, Jingzhang Feng, Devin Daeschel, Jasna Kovac, Abigail B Snyder","doi":"10.1128/msystems.00620-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate knowledge of the microbiota collected from surfaces in food processing environments is important for food quality and safety. This study assessed discrepancies in taxonomic composition and alpha and beta diversity values generated from eight different bioinformatic workflows for the analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences extracted from the microbiota collected from surfaces in dairy processing environments. We found that the microbiota collected from environmental surfaces varied widely in density (0-9.09 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) and Shannon alpha diversity (0.01-3.40). Consequently, depending on the sequence analysis method used, characterization of low-abundance genera (i.e., below 1% relative abundance) and the number of genera identified (114-173 genera) varied considerably. Some low-abundance genera, including <i>Listeria</i>, varied between the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) methods. Centered log-ratio transformation inflated alpha and beta diversity values compared to rarefaction. Furthermore, the ASV method also inflated alpha and beta diversity values compared to the OTU method (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Therefore, for sparse, uneven, low-density data sets, the OTU method and rarefaction are better for taxonomic and ecological characterization of surface microbiota.IMPORTANCECulture-dependent environmental monitoring programs are used by the food industry to identify foodborne pathogens and spoilage biota on surfaces in food processing environments. The use of culture-independent 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to characterize this surface microbiota has been proposed as a tool to enhance environmental monitoring. However, there is no consensus on the most suitable bioinformatic analyses to accurately capture the diverse levels and types of bacteria on surfaces in food processing environments. Here, we quantify the impact of different bioinformatic analyses on the results and interpretation of 16S rRNA amplicon sequences collected from three cultured dairy facilities in New York State. This study provides guidance for the selection of appropriate 16S rRNA analysis procedures for studying environmental microbiota in dairy processing environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18819,"journal":{"name":"mSystems","volume":" ","pages":"e0062024"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mSystems","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00620-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate knowledge of the microbiota collected from surfaces in food processing environments is important for food quality and safety. This study assessed discrepancies in taxonomic composition and alpha and beta diversity values generated from eight different bioinformatic workflows for the analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences extracted from the microbiota collected from surfaces in dairy processing environments. We found that the microbiota collected from environmental surfaces varied widely in density (0-9.09 log10 CFU/cm2) and Shannon alpha diversity (0.01-3.40). Consequently, depending on the sequence analysis method used, characterization of low-abundance genera (i.e., below 1% relative abundance) and the number of genera identified (114-173 genera) varied considerably. Some low-abundance genera, including Listeria, varied between the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) methods. Centered log-ratio transformation inflated alpha and beta diversity values compared to rarefaction. Furthermore, the ASV method also inflated alpha and beta diversity values compared to the OTU method (P < 0.05). Therefore, for sparse, uneven, low-density data sets, the OTU method and rarefaction are better for taxonomic and ecological characterization of surface microbiota.IMPORTANCECulture-dependent environmental monitoring programs are used by the food industry to identify foodborne pathogens and spoilage biota on surfaces in food processing environments. The use of culture-independent 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to characterize this surface microbiota has been proposed as a tool to enhance environmental monitoring. However, there is no consensus on the most suitable bioinformatic analyses to accurately capture the diverse levels and types of bacteria on surfaces in food processing environments. Here, we quantify the impact of different bioinformatic analyses on the results and interpretation of 16S rRNA amplicon sequences collected from three cultured dairy facilities in New York State. This study provides guidance for the selection of appropriate 16S rRNA analysis procedures for studying environmental microbiota in dairy processing environments.
mSystemsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
308
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
mSystems™ will publish preeminent work that stems from applying technologies for high-throughput analyses to achieve insights into the metabolic and regulatory systems at the scale of both the single cell and microbial communities. The scope of mSystems™ encompasses all important biological and biochemical findings drawn from analyses of large data sets, as well as new computational approaches for deriving these insights. mSystems™ will welcome submissions from researchers who focus on the microbiome, genomics, metagenomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, glycomics, bioinformatics, and computational microbiology. mSystems™ will provide streamlined decisions, while carrying on ASM''s tradition of rigorous peer review.