Intensity of Social Needs Case Management Services and Changes in Hospital and Emergency Department Use Among Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002071
Crystal Guo, Timothy T Brown, Hector P Rodriguez, Margae Knox, Mark D Fleming, Elizabeth A Hernandez, Daniel M Brown, Amanda L Brewster
{"title":"Intensity of Social Needs Case Management Services and Changes in Hospital and Emergency Department Use Among Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries.","authors":"Crystal Guo, Timothy T Brown, Hector P Rodriguez, Margae Knox, Mark D Fleming, Elizabeth A Hernandez, Daniel M Brown, Amanda L Brewster","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We identify the association between high- and low-intensity case management services on hospital and emergency department (ED) use among CommunityConnect patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Social needs case management services vary in intensity, including the modality, workforce specialization, and maximum caseload. CommunityConnect is a social needs case management program implemented by Contra Costa Health, a county safety-net health system in California's San Francisco Bay Area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Due to the endogeneity of high-intensity services assigned to high-risk patients, we instrument for service intensity using the number of specialist case managers hired each month of enrollment. Zero-inflated negative binomial models with 2-stage residual inclusion estimated total and avoidable hospital admissions and ED visits 12 months post-enrollment for adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled between August 2017 and December 2018 (n = 19,782).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with low-intensity case management, high-intensity services were associated with a reduction in the incidence rates of inpatient admissions [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.106-1.102; P = 0.072], ED visits (IRR = 0.608, 95% CI: 0.188-1.965; P = 0.058), and avoidable ED visits (IRR = 0.579, 95% CI: 0.179-1.872; P = 0.091). No significant association was found between service intensity and the likelihood of an event being an excess zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-intensity social needs case management may be more effective than low-intensity service at reducing health care use for individuals with non-zero use, suggesting that intensive case management may be especially helpful in supporting discharge and transitions of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We identify the association between high- and low-intensity case management services on hospital and emergency department (ED) use among CommunityConnect patients.

Background: Social needs case management services vary in intensity, including the modality, workforce specialization, and maximum caseload. CommunityConnect is a social needs case management program implemented by Contra Costa Health, a county safety-net health system in California's San Francisco Bay Area.

Methods: Due to the endogeneity of high-intensity services assigned to high-risk patients, we instrument for service intensity using the number of specialist case managers hired each month of enrollment. Zero-inflated negative binomial models with 2-stage residual inclusion estimated total and avoidable hospital admissions and ED visits 12 months post-enrollment for adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled between August 2017 and December 2018 (n = 19,782).

Results: Compared with low-intensity case management, high-intensity services were associated with a reduction in the incidence rates of inpatient admissions [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.106-1.102; P = 0.072], ED visits (IRR = 0.608, 95% CI: 0.188-1.965; P = 0.058), and avoidable ED visits (IRR = 0.579, 95% CI: 0.179-1.872; P = 0.091). No significant association was found between service intensity and the likelihood of an event being an excess zero.

Conclusions: High-intensity social needs case management may be more effective than low-intensity service at reducing health care use for individuals with non-zero use, suggesting that intensive case management may be especially helpful in supporting discharge and transitions of care.

社会需求个案管理服务的强度与成人医疗补助受益人使用医院和急诊科的变化。
目的: 我们确定了高强度和低强度病例管理服务与 CommunityConnect 患者使用医院和急诊科(ED)之间的关系:我们确定了高强度和低强度个案管理服务对 CommunityConnect 患者使用医院和急诊科(ED)的影响:背景:社会需求个案管理服务的强度各不相同,包括方式、劳动力专业化和最大案例量。CommunityConnect 是由加州旧金山湾区的一个县级安全网医疗系统 Contra Costa Health 实施的一项社会需求个案管理计划:由于分配给高风险患者的高强度服务具有内生性,因此我们使用注册后每月聘用的专家个案经理的数量来衡量服务强度。对 2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 12 月期间加入医疗补助计划的成年受益人(n = 19782 人),采用 2 级残差包含的零膨胀负二项模型估算了加入计划后 12 个月的总入院率和可避免的急诊就诊率:与低强度的个案管理相比,高强度服务与住院率[发生率比(IRR)= 0.341,95% CI:0.106-1.102;P = 0.072]、急诊室就诊率(IRR = 0.608,95% CI:0.188-1.965;P = 0.058)和可避免的急诊室就诊率(IRR = 0.579,95% CI:0.179-1.872;P = 0.091)的降低相关。结论:高强度的社会需求个案管理与可避免的急诊就诊(IRR = 0.579,95% CI:0.179-1.872;P = 0.091)之间无明显关联:高强度的社会需求个案管理可能比低强度的服务更能有效地减少非零使用率人群的医疗服务使用,这表明高强度的个案管理在支持出院和护理过渡方面可能特别有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信