Midterm single-center results with the use of custom-made endografts with inner branches: a call for attention.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jose I Torrealba, Giuseppe Panuccio, Petroula Nana, Antonino Giordano, Daour Yousef Al Sarhan, Tilo Kölbel
{"title":"Midterm single-center results with the use of custom-made endografts with inner branches: a call for attention.","authors":"Jose I Torrealba, Giuseppe Panuccio, Petroula Nana, Antonino Giordano, Daour Yousef Al Sarhan, Tilo Kölbel","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.09.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the patency of bridging covered stents (BCS) bridged to inner branches in custom-made thoracoabdominal endografts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study identifying all patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (f/b EVAR) in whom the reno-visceral target vessels (TVs) were bridged with a BCS to an inner branch of a custom-made (CMD) endograft. Technical success and perioperative complications were noted. Follow-up BCS patencies were evaluated, and in patients with follow-up, two groups based on BCS were created, a group with BCS occlusion and a group with BCS patent. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors related to visceral and renal bridging stent occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2019 through 2022, 69 patients undergoing complex aortic repair had at least one TV bridged to an inner branch built into a CMD endograft. Eighty-six percent of the grafts had only inner branches, whereas 14% had a mix of fenestrations for the visceral TVs and inner branches for the renal arteries. Twenty-five percent of patients presented as urgent and received an endograft originally designed for another patient and available on our shelf at the time. A total of 245 TVs were connected to inner branches: celiac trunk (CT), 54; superior mesenteric artery (SMA), 59; and renal artery (RA), 132. Technical success was 99%. There was a 23% complication and 9% perioperative mortality rate. At follow-up, we identified 6% of visceral and 14% of renal BCS occlusions. The primary patency for RA BCS was 83% at 12 months and 58% at 24 months. For the CT-SMA BCS, Kaplan-Maier showed a patency of 99% and 96% at 12 and 24 months. In the univariate analysis, a misaligned TV ostium (P = .001), the postoperative BCS diameter on postoperative computed tomography angiography (P = .02), and the preoperative infrarenal aortic angle >60° (P = .007) were correlated with RA BCS occlusion. In the multivariate analysis, only the misaligned TV ostium (P = .002) and infrarenal angle >60° (P = .01) were significantly correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our series of complex aortic repair, the incorporation of inner branches to bridge TVs is associated with a high renal BCS occlusion rate. Improper alignment of the branches with the TV ostium and acute aortic angles might play a significant role. Further research on this technology is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.09.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patency of bridging covered stents (BCS) bridged to inner branches in custom-made thoracoabdominal endografts.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study identifying all patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (f/b EVAR) in whom the reno-visceral target vessels (TVs) were bridged with a BCS to an inner branch of a custom-made (CMD) endograft. Technical success and perioperative complications were noted. Follow-up BCS patencies were evaluated, and in patients with follow-up, two groups based on BCS were created, a group with BCS occlusion and a group with BCS patent. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors related to visceral and renal bridging stent occlusion.

Results: From 2019 through 2022, 69 patients undergoing complex aortic repair had at least one TV bridged to an inner branch built into a CMD endograft. Eighty-six percent of the grafts had only inner branches, whereas 14% had a mix of fenestrations for the visceral TVs and inner branches for the renal arteries. Twenty-five percent of patients presented as urgent and received an endograft originally designed for another patient and available on our shelf at the time. A total of 245 TVs were connected to inner branches: celiac trunk (CT), 54; superior mesenteric artery (SMA), 59; and renal artery (RA), 132. Technical success was 99%. There was a 23% complication and 9% perioperative mortality rate. At follow-up, we identified 6% of visceral and 14% of renal BCS occlusions. The primary patency for RA BCS was 83% at 12 months and 58% at 24 months. For the CT-SMA BCS, Kaplan-Maier showed a patency of 99% and 96% at 12 and 24 months. In the univariate analysis, a misaligned TV ostium (P = .001), the postoperative BCS diameter on postoperative computed tomography angiography (P = .02), and the preoperative infrarenal aortic angle >60° (P = .007) were correlated with RA BCS occlusion. In the multivariate analysis, only the misaligned TV ostium (P = .002) and infrarenal angle >60° (P = .01) were significantly correlated.

Conclusions: In our series of complex aortic repair, the incorporation of inner branches to bridge TVs is associated with a high renal BCS occlusion rate. Improper alignment of the branches with the TV ostium and acute aortic angles might play a significant role. Further research on this technology is needed.

使用带内分支的定制内移植物的单中心中期结果值得关注。
目的评估桥接覆盖支架(BCS)桥接定制胸腹腔内支架内分支的通畅性:方法:单中心回顾性研究,确定所有接受栅栏式或分支式血管内主动脉修复术(f/b EVAR)的患者,这些患者的内脏靶血管(TV)与定制的(CMD)内移植物的内分支之间使用了桥接覆盖支架(BCS)。研究人员注意到了技术成功率和围手术期并发症。对随访的BCS通畅情况进行了评估,并根据BCS通畅情况将随访患者分为两组:BCS闭塞组和BCS通畅组。对内脏和肾脏桥接支架闭塞的相关因素进行了单变量和多变量分析:2019-2022年,69名接受复杂主动脉修复术的患者至少有一个TV桥接到了CMD内移植物的内支。86%的移植物仅有内支,而14%的内脏TV和肾动脉内支混合使用。25%的患者因病情紧急而接受了原本为另一位患者设计的内植物移植,当时我们的货架上就有这种内植物。245 例内脏 TV 与内脏分支相连:腹腔干 (CT) 54 例,肠系膜上动脉 (SMA) 59 例,肾动脉 (RA) 132 例。技术成功率为 99%。并发症发生率为 23%,围手术期死亡率为 9%。在随访中,我们发现内脏 BCS 闭塞率为 6%,肾脏 BCS 闭塞率为 14%。12个月和24个月时,RA BCS的主要通畅率分别为83%和58%。对于 CT-SMA BCS,Kaplan-Maier(KM)显示 12 个月和 24 个月的通畅率分别为 99% 和 96%。在单变量分析中,TV骨膜错位(P 0.001)、术后CTA显示的术后BCS直径(P 0.02)和术前肾下主动脉夹角大于60º(0.007)与RA BCS闭塞相关。在多变量分析中,只有TV骨膜错位(P 0.002)和肾下角度>60°(P 0.01)与RA BCS闭塞显著相关:结论:在我们的复杂主动脉修复系列中,采用内分支桥接TV与较高的肾脏BCS闭塞率有关。分支与电视骨膜对位不当以及急性主动脉夹角可能是重要原因。这项技术还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信