Prospective Study of Contamination Spread Produced During Open Surgical vs Conventional Percutaneous vs Novel Percutaneous Tracheostomy During COVID-19 Era in a Pig Model.

Abstract

Background: Because of concerns about provider contamination during tracheostomy procedures in a pandemic such as COVID-19, it is essential to objectively evaluate aerosol generation in all tracheostomy approaches, including newly developed tracheostomy procedures. We performed open surgical tracheostomy (OST), conventional percutaneous tracheostomy (CPT), and novel percutaneous tracheostomy (NPT), a modification of CPT designed to reduce contamination spread, in pig models and then compared the degree of contamination with providers using Glo Germ (Glo Germ).

Study design: Six Yorkshire pigs were used for data collection. Either OST, CPT, or NPT was performed on the pigs by the same team including a surgeon, anesthesiologist, and respiratory therapist. A mixture of Glo Germ and water was administered via an atomizer into the oral cavity to the tracheal bifurcation before each procedure, and additionally dispersed via an aersolizer in the trachea and lungs through the endotracheal tube before and throughout the procedure. Before and immediately after each procedure, prespecified body parts of the providers were photographed and 2 independent examiners blindly evaluated the photographs to determine degree of Glo Germ contamination using a 3-point Likert scale.

Results: Total contamination among provider team average score (minimum 0, maximum 2), was significantly lower for OST than CPT (0.29 ± 0.59 vs 0.63 ± 0.65; p < 0.01) or NPT (0.29 ± 0.59 vs 0.59 ± 0.66; p < 0.01). No significant difference was seen in overall contamination of any provider between CPT and NPT (0.63 ± 0.65 vs 0.59 ± 0.66; p = 0.92).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that OST causes significantly less aerosol contamination to providers than either CPT or NPT.