Pelvic Binder Radiography Is Safe and Feasible for Quantifying Fracture Instability in LC1 Pelvis Fractures: A Clinical Trial.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Joseph T Patterson, Andrew M Duong, Camille Flynn, Annabel Kim, Kenji Inaba, Sravanthi Reddy, Sarah R Blumenthal, Joshua L Gary
{"title":"Pelvic Binder Radiography Is Safe and Feasible for Quantifying Fracture Instability in LC1 Pelvis Fractures: A Clinical Trial.","authors":"Joseph T Patterson, Andrew M Duong, Camille Flynn, Annabel Kim, Kenji Inaba, Sravanthi Reddy, Sarah R Blumenthal, Joshua L Gary","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate fracture displacement, patient tolerance, and in-hospital safety quantifying lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvis fracture stability with awake stress radiography using a pelvic binder (PBR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective clinical trial of PBR diagnostic intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two centers, Level I trauma center and academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Alert adults with LC1 (OTA/AO B1.1/2.1) pelvic fractures from blunt mechanism presenting within 3 weeks of injury between February and December 2023 without hypotension or injury precluding pelvic binder application.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was fracture displacement on PBR. Secondary outcomes included feasibility (≥85% patient tolerance) and safety (no major adverse events). Exploratory outcomes included pain during examination, opioid medication consumption within 96 hours, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, and correlation between fracture displacement on PBR and examination under anesthetic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-nine patients with pelvis fractures were screened, 58 were eligible, and 31 were enrolled. The mean age of enrolled patients was 58.7 ± 23 years, 54.8% were female, 22.6% were White, and 67.7% Hispanic. Fracture displacement was 4.3 ± 4.7 mm on PBR at 5 kg and 8.4 ± 9.0 mm at 10 kg. All patients tolerated PBR. Sixteen patients (52%) reported pain during PBR but completed the test. No patient experienced an adverse event. Patients received 40.4 ± 56.4 mg oral morphine equivalents within 96 hours of PBR. Ten patients (32.2%) received internal fixation. The median hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 5.5 days) with no inpatient mortality. Fourteen patients (45.2%) discharged home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PBR is feasible and safe as a point-of-care test for LC1 pelvis fracture instability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II Diagnostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"38 11S","pages":"S15-S22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To demonstrate fracture displacement, patient tolerance, and in-hospital safety quantifying lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvis fracture stability with awake stress radiography using a pelvic binder (PBR).

Methods:

Design: Prospective clinical trial of PBR diagnostic intervention.

Setting: Two centers, Level I trauma center and academic hospital.

Patient selection criteria: Alert adults with LC1 (OTA/AO B1.1/2.1) pelvic fractures from blunt mechanism presenting within 3 weeks of injury between February and December 2023 without hypotension or injury precluding pelvic binder application.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was fracture displacement on PBR. Secondary outcomes included feasibility (≥85% patient tolerance) and safety (no major adverse events). Exploratory outcomes included pain during examination, opioid medication consumption within 96 hours, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, and correlation between fracture displacement on PBR and examination under anesthetic.

Results: One hundred sixty-nine patients with pelvis fractures were screened, 58 were eligible, and 31 were enrolled. The mean age of enrolled patients was 58.7 ± 23 years, 54.8% were female, 22.6% were White, and 67.7% Hispanic. Fracture displacement was 4.3 ± 4.7 mm on PBR at 5 kg and 8.4 ± 9.0 mm at 10 kg. All patients tolerated PBR. Sixteen patients (52%) reported pain during PBR but completed the test. No patient experienced an adverse event. Patients received 40.4 ± 56.4 mg oral morphine equivalents within 96 hours of PBR. Ten patients (32.2%) received internal fixation. The median hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 5.5 days) with no inpatient mortality. Fourteen patients (45.2%) discharged home.

Conclusions: PBR is feasible and safe as a point-of-care test for LC1 pelvis fracture instability.

Level of evidence: Level II Diagnostic.

骨盆粘合剂放射摄影可安全、可靠地量化 LC1 骨盆骨折的骨折不稳定性:临床试验。
目的使用骨盆固定器 (PBR),在清醒状态下进行应力放射摄影,以量化侧向压缩 1 型 (LC1) 骨盆骨折的稳定性,从而证明骨折移位、患者耐受性和院内安全性:方法:设计:设计:PBR 诊断干预的前瞻性临床试验:两个中心:一级创伤中心和学术医院:2023年2月至12月期间,钝器致骨盆骨折LC1(OTA/AO B1.1/2.1)的警戒成人,在受伤后3周内就诊,无低血压或因受伤而无法使用骨盆固定器:主要结果是骨盆固定器上的骨折移位。次要结果包括可行性(患者耐受性≥85%)和安全性(无重大不良事件)。探索性结果包括检查过程中的疼痛、96小时内阿片类药物的消耗量、住院时间、出院目的地以及PBR显示的骨折移位与麻醉下检查之间的相关性:共筛查了 169 名骨盆骨折患者,其中 58 人符合条件,31 人入选。入选患者的平均年龄为(58.7 ± 23)岁,54.8%为女性,22.6%为白人,67.7%为西班牙裔。体重为 5 公斤时,PBR 的骨折移位为 4.3 ± 4.7 毫米,体重为 10 公斤时,骨折移位为 8.4 ± 9.0 毫米。所有患者都能耐受 PBR。16名患者(52%)报告在PBR过程中感到疼痛,但还是完成了测试。没有患者出现不良反应。患者在 PBR 96 小时内口服了 40.4 ± 56.4 毫克吗啡当量。10名患者(32.2%)接受了内固定治疗。住院时间中位数为 6 天(四分位数间距为 5.5 天),无住院患者死亡。14名患者(45.2%)出院回家:作为LC1骨盆骨折不稳定性的护理点检测,PBR是可行且安全的:二级诊断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信