Oliver Sroka, Megan Campbell, Tyler Thorne, Justin Haller, David Rothberg, Thomas Higgins, Lucas Marchand
{"title":"Hardware Removal After Lisfranc ORIF Results in Improved Physical Function.","authors":"Oliver Sroka, Megan Campbell, Tyler Thorne, Justin Haller, David Rothberg, Thomas Higgins, Lucas Marchand","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether HWR after Lisfranc ORIF resulted in significant impact via PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain intensity (PI) scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level-1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Adult patients with isolated Lisfranc injuries who were treated via ORIF between 2002-2023 that had PROMIS PF and PI scores through 6 months follow-up were included. Patients were excluded if they received index treatment other than ORIF or underwent secondary surgical intervention prior to HWR. A sub analysis was performed at 1 year follow- up.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Primary outcomes were PROMIS PF and PI scores. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared differences between PROMIS scores within the HWR group. The Wilcoxon ranked-sum test compared differences between HWR vs no HWR. Distributive MCID was calculated using the 0.5 SD method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 482 patients (489 feet) identified with isolated Lisfranc injuries. Seventy-seven feet underwent ORIF followed by HWR. Thirty feet underwent ORIF without HWR. The average age of the no HWR group was 45.8 (18.0-81.3) versus the HWR group which was 38.7 (18.3-74.1) (p=0.053). Nineteen (63.3%) were female in the no HWR group compared to 33 (42.9%) in the HWR group (p=0.084). HWR occurred an average of 4.43 months after ORIF. Patients who underwent HWR had a statistically significant increase in average PF scores (39.7 to 45.9, p<0.001) at their standard 6 week (1.5 month) postoperative visit. HWR patients had a non-significant decrease in average PI scores (56.5 to 53.9, p=0.24). Compared to those with retained hardware, the HWR group demonstrated a statistically significant net improvement in PF and PI scores from surgery, with an average improvement of 5.6 and 1.7, respectively (P=0.002, 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients experienced significant improvement in PROMIS PF scores for Lisfranc ORIF at 6 weeks after HWR. Compared to patients with retained hardware, they also experienced significant improvement in PROMIS PF and PI scores.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether HWR after Lisfranc ORIF resulted in significant impact via PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain intensity (PI) scores.
Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort.
Setting: Level-1 trauma center.
Patient selection criteria: Adult patients with isolated Lisfranc injuries who were treated via ORIF between 2002-2023 that had PROMIS PF and PI scores through 6 months follow-up were included. Patients were excluded if they received index treatment other than ORIF or underwent secondary surgical intervention prior to HWR. A sub analysis was performed at 1 year follow- up.
Outcome measures and comparisons: Primary outcomes were PROMIS PF and PI scores. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared differences between PROMIS scores within the HWR group. The Wilcoxon ranked-sum test compared differences between HWR vs no HWR. Distributive MCID was calculated using the 0.5 SD method.
Results: There were 482 patients (489 feet) identified with isolated Lisfranc injuries. Seventy-seven feet underwent ORIF followed by HWR. Thirty feet underwent ORIF without HWR. The average age of the no HWR group was 45.8 (18.0-81.3) versus the HWR group which was 38.7 (18.3-74.1) (p=0.053). Nineteen (63.3%) were female in the no HWR group compared to 33 (42.9%) in the HWR group (p=0.084). HWR occurred an average of 4.43 months after ORIF. Patients who underwent HWR had a statistically significant increase in average PF scores (39.7 to 45.9, p<0.001) at their standard 6 week (1.5 month) postoperative visit. HWR patients had a non-significant decrease in average PI scores (56.5 to 53.9, p=0.24). Compared to those with retained hardware, the HWR group demonstrated a statistically significant net improvement in PF and PI scores from surgery, with an average improvement of 5.6 and 1.7, respectively (P=0.002, 0.008).
Conclusions: Patients experienced significant improvement in PROMIS PF scores for Lisfranc ORIF at 6 weeks after HWR. Compared to patients with retained hardware, they also experienced significant improvement in PROMIS PF and PI scores.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
