{"title":"Plasma Radiofrequency Tuboplasty and Cartilage Underlay Myringoplasty for Repairing Chronic Large Perforation with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.","authors":"Zhengcai Lou, Zihan Lou, Tian Lv, Zhengnong Chen","doi":"10.1177/19160216241291822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty (ECM) with or without plasma radiofrequency (RF) tuboplasty (PRT) for repairing chronic large perforation with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Chronic large perforations with ETD were randomly divided into receiving ECM or ECM plus PRT. During the 24 months follow-up, the Eustachian tube score (ETS), Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7), ET inflammation scale, hearing results, and graft success rate of the patients were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 subjects were included in the study. Difference of ETS was significant before and after surgery in the ECM + PRT group (<i>P</i> < .05) but the ECM group was not (<i>P</i> > .05). Also, significant between-group difference was found regardless of post-24 months ETS and improvement value. Postoperative ETDQ-7 scores were significantly reduced compared with preoperative ETDQ-7 scores in both groups (<i>P</i> < .05), also, significant between-group difference was found regardless of post-24 months ETDQ-7 scores and improvement value. The graft success rate was 86.7% in the ECM group and 96.8% in the ECM + PRT group at postoperative 24 months (<i>P</i> > .05). In addition, although the ECM + PRT group showed a better air-bone gap improvement than the ECM group, the difference was not significant (13.01 ± 2.97 vs 10.92 ± 0.69 dB; <i>P</i> > .05). No PRT procedure-related serious adverse events were reported during the follow-up process. No patients developed atelectasis or otitis media with effusion in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECM combined with low-temperature PRT did not affect the graft success rate but showed a better long-term improvement in ETS and ETDQ-7 than cartilage myringoplasty for the treatment of chronic perforation with ETD. In addition, although PRT showed a better hearing improvement, the difference was not significant between the 2 groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"53 ","pages":"19160216241291822"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241291822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty (ECM) with or without plasma radiofrequency (RF) tuboplasty (PRT) for repairing chronic large perforation with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD).
Materials and methods: Chronic large perforations with ETD were randomly divided into receiving ECM or ECM plus PRT. During the 24 months follow-up, the Eustachian tube score (ETS), Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7), ET inflammation scale, hearing results, and graft success rate of the patients were analyzed.
Results: A total of 61 subjects were included in the study. Difference of ETS was significant before and after surgery in the ECM + PRT group (P < .05) but the ECM group was not (P > .05). Also, significant between-group difference was found regardless of post-24 months ETS and improvement value. Postoperative ETDQ-7 scores were significantly reduced compared with preoperative ETDQ-7 scores in both groups (P < .05), also, significant between-group difference was found regardless of post-24 months ETDQ-7 scores and improvement value. The graft success rate was 86.7% in the ECM group and 96.8% in the ECM + PRT group at postoperative 24 months (P > .05). In addition, although the ECM + PRT group showed a better air-bone gap improvement than the ECM group, the difference was not significant (13.01 ± 2.97 vs 10.92 ± 0.69 dB; P > .05). No PRT procedure-related serious adverse events were reported during the follow-up process. No patients developed atelectasis or otitis media with effusion in either group.
Conclusion: ECM combined with low-temperature PRT did not affect the graft success rate but showed a better long-term improvement in ETS and ETDQ-7 than cartilage myringoplasty for the treatment of chronic perforation with ETD. In addition, although PRT showed a better hearing improvement, the difference was not significant between the 2 groups.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
