Outcomes Associated with the use of High Dose Corticosteroids and IL-6 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary to SARS COV-2.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tessa Milic, Kieran Shah, Anish Mitra, Sarah Stabler
{"title":"Outcomes Associated with the use of High Dose Corticosteroids and IL-6 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary to SARS COV-2.","authors":"Tessa Milic, Kieran Shah, Anish Mitra, Sarah Stabler","doi":"10.1177/08850666241287514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, treatment strategies evolved rapidly. The RECOVERY trial established corticosteroids as the standard care for reducing mortality in COVID-19 patients. However, some critical care clinicians began using doses higher than those recommended in RECOVERY.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the use of high-dose corticosteroids and IL-6 inhibitors in critically ill COVID-19 patients and examine their association with adverse drug events (ADEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 320 electronic health records (January 1, 2020 - June 30, 2022) was conducted on COVID-19 patients requiring high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Patients were categorized based on corticosteroid dose: \"high dose dexamethasone\" (daily dose greater than 12 mg and/or for longer than 10 days), \"low dose dexamethasone\" (daily dose 12 mg or less for 10 days or less), and \"no dexamethasone\" (no corticosteroid therapy). Subgroups were created based on IL-6 inhibitor use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-dose dexamethasone was associated with increased odds of ADEs compared to low dose (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.45 to 4.49) and no dexamethasone (OR 6.29, 95% CI 2.08 to 19.03). No additional efficacy benefit was observed in patients receiving high dose corticosteroids when compared to low dose corticosteroids. Patients receiving both an IL-6 inhibitor and high-dose dexamethasone had further increased odds of ADEs. High-dose dexamethasone was also associated with increased mortality compared to low dose (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.97-7.25) and no dexamethasone (OR 15.22, 95% CI 3.27-70.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acknowledging the risk for residual confounding, higher doses of dexamethasone were associated with increased ADEs and mortality. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of the use of high-dose dexamethasone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241287514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, treatment strategies evolved rapidly. The RECOVERY trial established corticosteroids as the standard care for reducing mortality in COVID-19 patients. However, some critical care clinicians began using doses higher than those recommended in RECOVERY.

Objective: To characterize the use of high-dose corticosteroids and IL-6 inhibitors in critically ill COVID-19 patients and examine their association with adverse drug events (ADEs).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 320 electronic health records (January 1, 2020 - June 30, 2022) was conducted on COVID-19 patients requiring high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Patients were categorized based on corticosteroid dose: "high dose dexamethasone" (daily dose greater than 12 mg and/or for longer than 10 days), "low dose dexamethasone" (daily dose 12 mg or less for 10 days or less), and "no dexamethasone" (no corticosteroid therapy). Subgroups were created based on IL-6 inhibitor use.

Results: High-dose dexamethasone was associated with increased odds of ADEs compared to low dose (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.45 to 4.49) and no dexamethasone (OR 6.29, 95% CI 2.08 to 19.03). No additional efficacy benefit was observed in patients receiving high dose corticosteroids when compared to low dose corticosteroids. Patients receiving both an IL-6 inhibitor and high-dose dexamethasone had further increased odds of ADEs. High-dose dexamethasone was also associated with increased mortality compared to low dose (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.97-7.25) and no dexamethasone (OR 15.22, 95% CI 3.27-70.74).

Conclusions: Acknowledging the risk for residual confounding, higher doses of dexamethasone were associated with increased ADEs and mortality. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of the use of high-dose dexamethasone.

使用大剂量皮质类固醇和 IL-6 抑制剂治疗继发于 SARS COV-2 的急性呼吸窘迫综合征的相关结果。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,治疗策略发展迅速。RECOVERY 试验将皮质类固醇确定为降低 COVID-19 患者死亡率的标准治疗方法。然而,一些重症监护临床医生开始使用高于 RECOVERY 推荐剂量的皮质类固醇:目的:描述 COVID-19 重症患者使用大剂量皮质类固醇和 IL-6 抑制剂的情况,并研究它们与药物不良事件 (ADE) 的关系:对需要高流量供氧或机械通气的 COVID-19 患者的 320 份电子健康记录(2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日)进行回顾性队列研究。根据皮质类固醇剂量对患者进行分类:"高剂量地塞米松"(每日剂量大于 12 毫克和/或持续时间超过 10 天)、"低剂量地塞米松"(每日剂量为 12 毫克或以下,持续时间为 10 天或以下)和 "无地塞米松"(无皮质类固醇治疗)。根据IL-6抑制剂的使用情况建立了分组:与低剂量(OR 2.55,95% CI 1.45 至 4.49)和无地塞米松(OR 6.29,95% CI 2.08 至 19.03)相比,高剂量地塞米松与 ADEs 的几率增加有关。与低剂量皮质类固醇相比,接受高剂量皮质类固醇治疗的患者没有观察到额外的疗效。同时接受IL-6抑制剂和大剂量地塞米松治疗的患者发生ADEs的几率进一步增加。与小剂量地塞米松(OR 3.78,95% CI 1.97-7.25)和不使用地塞米松(OR 15.22,95% CI 3.27-70.74)相比,大剂量地塞米松也与死亡率增加有关:考虑到残余混杂的风险,地塞米松剂量越大,ADEs和死亡率越高。这些发现突出表明,在使用大剂量地塞米松时需要慎重考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信