Cervical Spine Vibration Modifies Oculomotor Function in Young Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alice E Cade, Philip R K Turnbull
{"title":"Cervical Spine Vibration Modifies Oculomotor Function in Young Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Alice E Cade, Philip R K Turnbull","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate if vibrational interference of spinal proprioception affects oculomotor function, visual attention and processing, and selective attention in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) compared to healthy age-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a parallel design, single-session intervention with 20 young adults with mTBI and 20 age-matched controls. Each completed a battery of computerized eye-tracking assessments (CEAs), including egocentric localization, fixational stability, smooth pursuit, saccades, Stroop, and the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), and then had their cervical spine function (flexion-relaxation ratio) recorded at baseline. Spinal vibration (100 Hz) was applied to the cervical spine and the CEA battery was repeated. CEA outcomes were compared to baseline and between mTBI and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following cervical vibration, significant pre to post-differences were seen in both the mTBI and control group for egocentric localization, fixation stability, pursuit, saccades, Stroop, and VOR. At baseline, there was a significant difference between the mTBI and control groups across many CEA measures, with the mTBI group performing more poorly in egocentric localization, pursuit, saccades, Stroop, and VOR. The mTBI group also had a poorer flexion-relaxation ratio than the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical spine vibration improved cognitive and oculomotor performance in the mTBI group for VOR, Stroop, and pursuit, but had mixed effects on the control group. These findings suggest that some optometric mTBI symptoms may result from spinal or proprioceptive dysfunction, as altering proprioceptive input appears to positively impact visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.08.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate if vibrational interference of spinal proprioception affects oculomotor function, visual attention and processing, and selective attention in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) compared to healthy age-matched controls.

Methods: This study was a parallel design, single-session intervention with 20 young adults with mTBI and 20 age-matched controls. Each completed a battery of computerized eye-tracking assessments (CEAs), including egocentric localization, fixational stability, smooth pursuit, saccades, Stroop, and the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), and then had their cervical spine function (flexion-relaxation ratio) recorded at baseline. Spinal vibration (100 Hz) was applied to the cervical spine and the CEA battery was repeated. CEA outcomes were compared to baseline and between mTBI and control groups.

Results: Following cervical vibration, significant pre to post-differences were seen in both the mTBI and control group for egocentric localization, fixation stability, pursuit, saccades, Stroop, and VOR. At baseline, there was a significant difference between the mTBI and control groups across many CEA measures, with the mTBI group performing more poorly in egocentric localization, pursuit, saccades, Stroop, and VOR. The mTBI group also had a poorer flexion-relaxation ratio than the control group.

Conclusion: Cervical spine vibration improved cognitive and oculomotor performance in the mTBI group for VOR, Stroop, and pursuit, but had mixed effects on the control group. These findings suggest that some optometric mTBI symptoms may result from spinal or proprioceptive dysfunction, as altering proprioceptive input appears to positively impact visual outcomes.

颈椎振动改变脑外伤青年的眼球运动功能
研究目的本研究的目的是调查与健康的年龄匹配对照组相比,脊柱本体感觉的振动干扰是否会影响轻度脑损伤(mTBI)患者的眼球运动功能、视觉注意和处理以及选择性注意:本研究采用平行设计、单次干预的方法,对 20 名轻度脑损伤患者和 20 名年龄匹配的对照组进行干预。每个人都完成了一系列计算机化眼动追踪评估(CEAs),包括眼球中心定位、固定稳定性、平滑追逐、眼球移动、Stroop和前庭眼反射(VOR),然后在基线时记录他们的颈椎功能(屈伸松弛比)。在颈椎上施加脊柱振动(100 赫兹),然后重复进行 CEA 测试。将 CEA 结果与基线进行比较,并在 mTBI 组和对照组之间进行比较:结果:颈椎振动后,mTBI 组和对照组的眼球定位、固定稳定性、追随、囊视、Stroop 和 VOR 前后差异显著。在基线时,mTBI 组和对照组在许多 CEA 测量中存在显著差异,mTBI 组在眼球中心定位、追随、囊视、Stroop 和 VOR 方面表现更差。与对照组相比,mTBI组的屈伸-放松比率也更差:结论:颈椎振动改善了 mTBI 组在 VOR、Stroop 和追视方面的认知和眼球运动表现,但对对照组的影响不一。这些研究结果表明,一些视力方面的 mTBI 症状可能是脊柱或本体感觉功能障碍所致,因为改变本体感觉输入似乎会对视觉结果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信