Hospital brochures in mental healthcare. how patient-centered are they?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lies Sercu
{"title":"Hospital brochures in mental healthcare. how patient-centered are they?","authors":"Lies Sercu","doi":"10.1111/jep.14210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>From the results of the 2020 Flemish survey looking into psychiatric patients' views of the in-patient care they have received, it appeared that hospital communication is experienced as not sufficiently patient-centered. In communication research, the quality of written patient materials in physical healthcare has been scrutinized and suggestions for the enhancement of their patient-centeredness, comprehensibility, and actionability have been made. Yet, a similar research interest in the quality of health communication in mental healthcare has failed to materialize.</p><p><strong>Objective and design: </strong>Against a definition of patient-centeredness in mental healthcare, this study investigated the quality of 30 psychiatric hospital brochures from a triangulated linguistic and content perspective, using readability formulas as well as the CCI and PEMAT-P instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It appeared that none of the brochures are sufficiently patient-centered, as they fail to take appropriate and full account of mental health patients' specific concerns and difficulties.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The lack of quality brochures hampers patients' understanding of their mental health condition and participation in their recovery process, especially when they have a low (mental) health literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Together, hospitals and patient organizations, should remedy this situation and thus fortify the public's trust in the evidence-based and high-quality patient-centered care psychiatric hospitals offer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: From the results of the 2020 Flemish survey looking into psychiatric patients' views of the in-patient care they have received, it appeared that hospital communication is experienced as not sufficiently patient-centered. In communication research, the quality of written patient materials in physical healthcare has been scrutinized and suggestions for the enhancement of their patient-centeredness, comprehensibility, and actionability have been made. Yet, a similar research interest in the quality of health communication in mental healthcare has failed to materialize.

Objective and design: Against a definition of patient-centeredness in mental healthcare, this study investigated the quality of 30 psychiatric hospital brochures from a triangulated linguistic and content perspective, using readability formulas as well as the CCI and PEMAT-P instruments.

Results: It appeared that none of the brochures are sufficiently patient-centered, as they fail to take appropriate and full account of mental health patients' specific concerns and difficulties.

Discussion: The lack of quality brochures hampers patients' understanding of their mental health condition and participation in their recovery process, especially when they have a low (mental) health literacy.

Conclusion: Together, hospitals and patient organizations, should remedy this situation and thus fortify the public's trust in the evidence-based and high-quality patient-centered care psychiatric hospitals offer.

精神卫生保健中的医院宣传册。它们是如何以患者为中心的?
背景:2020 年弗拉芒大区调查了精神病患者对住院治疗的看法,从调查结果来看,医院的沟通似乎不够以患者为中心。在沟通研究中,人们对医疗保健领域患者书面材料的质量进行了仔细研究,并就如何提高这些材料的以患者为中心性、可理解性和可操作性提出了建议。然而,对精神卫生保健领域健康传播质量的类似研究兴趣却未能实现:本研究根据精神卫生保健中 "以患者为中心 "的定义,采用可读性公式以及 CCI 和 PEMAT-P 工具,从语言和内容的角度对 30 份精神病医院宣传册的质量进行了三角测量:结果:所有宣传册都没有充分以患者为中心,因为它们没有适当、充分地考虑到精神病患者的特殊关切和困难:讨论:缺乏高质量的宣传册阻碍了患者对其精神健康状况的了解和对康复过程的参与,尤其是当他们的(精神)健康知识水平较低时:结论:医院和患者组织应共同纠正这种情况,从而加强公众对精神科医院以循证医学为基础、以患者为中心的高质量医疗服务的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信