Endocardial ablation of ganglionated plexus for the treatment of carotid sinus syndrome.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Carlos Minguito-Carazo, Jesús Daniel Martínez-Alday, Javier García Seara, José Luis Martínez-Sande, Teba González-Ferrero, Oleksandr Shangutov, Juliana Elices-Teja, X Alberte Fernández López, José Ramón González-Juanatey, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero
{"title":"Endocardial ablation of ganglionated plexus for the treatment of carotid sinus syndrome.","authors":"Carlos Minguito-Carazo, Jesús Daniel Martínez-Alday, Javier García Seara, José Luis Martínez-Sande, Teba González-Ferrero, Oleksandr Shangutov, Juliana Elices-Teja, X Alberte Fernández López, José Ramón González-Juanatey, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero","doi":"10.1111/jce.16469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS), characterized by exaggerated vagal responses leading to asystolic pauses with carotid sinus massage (CSM), often necessitates pacemaker implantation. This study investigates cardioneuroablation (CNA) as an alternative strategy for CSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective study of consecutive patients referred for CNA due to CSS. All patients underwent CSM, atropine test and 24-h Holter monitoring before the procedure and at 6 months. The primary objective was the absence of any cardioinhibitory response to CSM following CNA. Secondary objectives included the combined endpoint of syncope and presyncope-free survival, pacemaker-free survival, differences in heart rate variation (HRV), as well as differences in the pre- and postprocedure atropine tests and in the SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 consecutive patients (84.6% male, mean age 63.8 ± 12.3 years) were included. CSM revealed a symptomatic asystolic pause in all patients before CNA (7.3 [5.6-10.5] s). After the procedure, all the patients had a negative CSM, and only one patient (7.7%) had a positive CSM at 6 months. After a median follow-up of 11.2 (10.6-16.3) months, syncope or presyncope-free survival was 84.6%, and none required pacemaker implantation. There was an improvement in the energy and health change items in the SF-36 questionnaire. There was a reduction in HR increase in the atropine test at 6 months (pre-CNA: 66% [52-84] vs. post-CNA 26.0% (19.8-29.3]; p = .008) and in HRV parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this proof-of-efficacy study, performed in patients affected by asystolic CSS, CNA was effective in reducing the rate of cardioinhibitory responses, suggesting a potential efficacy in also reducing syncopal recurrences. Controlled trials are warranted to corroborate clinical findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS), characterized by exaggerated vagal responses leading to asystolic pauses with carotid sinus massage (CSM), often necessitates pacemaker implantation. This study investigates cardioneuroablation (CNA) as an alternative strategy for CSS.

Methods: Prospective study of consecutive patients referred for CNA due to CSS. All patients underwent CSM, atropine test and 24-h Holter monitoring before the procedure and at 6 months. The primary objective was the absence of any cardioinhibitory response to CSM following CNA. Secondary objectives included the combined endpoint of syncope and presyncope-free survival, pacemaker-free survival, differences in heart rate variation (HRV), as well as differences in the pre- and postprocedure atropine tests and in the SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire.

Results: A total of 13 consecutive patients (84.6% male, mean age 63.8 ± 12.3 years) were included. CSM revealed a symptomatic asystolic pause in all patients before CNA (7.3 [5.6-10.5] s). After the procedure, all the patients had a negative CSM, and only one patient (7.7%) had a positive CSM at 6 months. After a median follow-up of 11.2 (10.6-16.3) months, syncope or presyncope-free survival was 84.6%, and none required pacemaker implantation. There was an improvement in the energy and health change items in the SF-36 questionnaire. There was a reduction in HR increase in the atropine test at 6 months (pre-CNA: 66% [52-84] vs. post-CNA 26.0% (19.8-29.3]; p = .008) and in HRV parameters.

Conclusions: In this proof-of-efficacy study, performed in patients affected by asystolic CSS, CNA was effective in reducing the rate of cardioinhibitory responses, suggesting a potential efficacy in also reducing syncopal recurrences. Controlled trials are warranted to corroborate clinical findings.

心内膜神经节丛消融术治疗颈动脉窦综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信