Feasibility, Acceptability, Satisfaction, and Challenges of an mHealth App (e-ASCov) for Community-Based COVID-19 Screening by Community Health Workers in Rwanda: Mixed Methods Study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Abdou Y Omorou, Pacifique Ndishimye, Bruno Hoen, Léon Mutesa, Prosper Karame, Ladislas Nshimiyimana, Simon Galmiche, Hassan Mugabo, Janvier Murayire, Muco Mugisha, Marie Michele Umulisa, Yvonne Delphine Nsaba Uwera, Clarisse Musanagabanwa, Noella Bigirimana, Sabin Nsanzimana, Francis Guillemin, Jean Paul Rwabihama
{"title":"Feasibility, Acceptability, Satisfaction, and Challenges of an mHealth App (e-ASCov) for Community-Based COVID-19 Screening by Community Health Workers in Rwanda: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Abdou Y Omorou, Pacifique Ndishimye, Bruno Hoen, Léon Mutesa, Prosper Karame, Ladislas Nshimiyimana, Simon Galmiche, Hassan Mugabo, Janvier Murayire, Muco Mugisha, Marie Michele Umulisa, Yvonne Delphine Nsaba Uwera, Clarisse Musanagabanwa, Noella Bigirimana, Sabin Nsanzimana, Francis Guillemin, Jean Paul Rwabihama","doi":"10.2196/50745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although at the base of the pyramid-shaped organization of the Rwandan health system, community health workers (CHWs) are central to the community-based management of disease outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This mixed methods study aimed to explore the feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and challenges of a mobile health (mHealth) tool for community-based COVID-19 screening in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two urban (Gasabo and Nyarugenge) and 2 rural (Rusizi and Kirehe) districts in Rwanda participated in the project (smartphone app for COVID-19 screening). A mixed methods approach was used to inform the feasibility (awareness and expectation), acceptability (use and perceived benefits), satisfaction, and challenges of the mHealth intervention. At the end of the project, CHWs were asked to complete a quantitative questionnaire on the use of and satisfaction with the app. Then, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were organized with CHWs. A content analysis was performed on the transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 383 CHWs were recruited and trained; 378 CHWs participated in the study. The mean age of CHWs was 36.7 (SD 6.6) to 45.3 (SD 9.9) years and most were women (237/378, 62.7%). More than 7000 people were registered with the use of the app and 20% were referred to a local COVID-19 testing facility. According to CHW reporting, the median number of people screened by each CHW ranged from 152 (IQR 70-276) for Nyarugenge to 24 (IQR 16-90) for Rusizi. COVID-19 positivity rates were higher in urban than rural districts: more than half of the CHWs in Gasabo reported a confirmed positive case versus only 2.4% for Kirehe and 15.4% for Rusizi. Despite the app being a novel tool, CHWs were well aware of the use of such a tool and had appropriate expectations. Acceptability and satisfaction were very high, with differences between urban and rural districts. Satisfaction was higher in Nyarugenge (72.8/100) and Gasabo (80.7/100) than in Kirehe (61.6/100) and Rusizi (64.5/100). More than 80% of the CHWs were willing to continue using the e-ASCov app, with the exception of CHWs in Kirehe (56.7%). The app was perceived as a tool to generate information on COVID-19, inform on the status of the pandemic, and help curb the spread of the pandemic in Rwanda. CHWs were satisfied with the app at all stages of its implementation in their districts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this proof-of-concept study, a smartphone app for screening COVID-19 was useful as an mHealth tool to be used by CHWs, with the potential to increase health system efficiency in an epidemic context. The context should be analyzed for generalization on a country-wide scale, both in case of an epidemic and to take into account certain conditions at the community level. Information is needed on the conditions of generalization and transferability of this type of app to other health conditions so that CHWs can be given their full place in a pyramidal health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":"12 ","pages":"e50745"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although at the base of the pyramid-shaped organization of the Rwandan health system, community health workers (CHWs) are central to the community-based management of disease outbreaks.

Objective: This mixed methods study aimed to explore the feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and challenges of a mobile health (mHealth) tool for community-based COVID-19 screening in Rwanda.

Methods: Two urban (Gasabo and Nyarugenge) and 2 rural (Rusizi and Kirehe) districts in Rwanda participated in the project (smartphone app for COVID-19 screening). A mixed methods approach was used to inform the feasibility (awareness and expectation), acceptability (use and perceived benefits), satisfaction, and challenges of the mHealth intervention. At the end of the project, CHWs were asked to complete a quantitative questionnaire on the use of and satisfaction with the app. Then, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were organized with CHWs. A content analysis was performed on the transcripts.

Results: Overall, 383 CHWs were recruited and trained; 378 CHWs participated in the study. The mean age of CHWs was 36.7 (SD 6.6) to 45.3 (SD 9.9) years and most were women (237/378, 62.7%). More than 7000 people were registered with the use of the app and 20% were referred to a local COVID-19 testing facility. According to CHW reporting, the median number of people screened by each CHW ranged from 152 (IQR 70-276) for Nyarugenge to 24 (IQR 16-90) for Rusizi. COVID-19 positivity rates were higher in urban than rural districts: more than half of the CHWs in Gasabo reported a confirmed positive case versus only 2.4% for Kirehe and 15.4% for Rusizi. Despite the app being a novel tool, CHWs were well aware of the use of such a tool and had appropriate expectations. Acceptability and satisfaction were very high, with differences between urban and rural districts. Satisfaction was higher in Nyarugenge (72.8/100) and Gasabo (80.7/100) than in Kirehe (61.6/100) and Rusizi (64.5/100). More than 80% of the CHWs were willing to continue using the e-ASCov app, with the exception of CHWs in Kirehe (56.7%). The app was perceived as a tool to generate information on COVID-19, inform on the status of the pandemic, and help curb the spread of the pandemic in Rwanda. CHWs were satisfied with the app at all stages of its implementation in their districts.

Conclusions: In this proof-of-concept study, a smartphone app for screening COVID-19 was useful as an mHealth tool to be used by CHWs, with the potential to increase health system efficiency in an epidemic context. The context should be analyzed for generalization on a country-wide scale, both in case of an epidemic and to take into account certain conditions at the community level. Information is needed on the conditions of generalization and transferability of this type of app to other health conditions so that CHWs can be given their full place in a pyramidal health system.

卢旺达社区卫生工作者基于社区进行 COVID-19 筛查的移动医疗应用程序(e-ASCov)的可行性、可接受性、满意度和挑战:混合方法研究。
背景:社区卫生工作者(CHWs)虽然处于卢旺达卫生系统金字塔型组织的底层,但他们在以社区为基础的疾病爆发管理中发挥着核心作用:这项混合方法研究旨在探讨移动医疗(mHealth)工具在卢旺达社区进行 COVID-19 筛查的可行性、可接受性、满意度和挑战:卢旺达的两个城市区(Gasabo 和 Nyarugenge)和两个农村区(Rusizi 和 Kirehe)参与了该项目(用于 COVID-19 筛查的智能手机应用程序)。该项目采用混合方法,以了解移动医疗干预的可行性(认知度和期望值)、可接受性(使用和感知的益处)、满意度和挑战。在项目结束时,卫生保健工作者被要求填写一份关于应用程序使用情况和满意度的定量问卷。然后,与社区保健员进行了深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。结果:总共招募并培训了 383 名社区保健员,其中 378 名社区保健员参与了研究。社区保健员的平均年龄为 36.7(标准差 6.6)至 45.3(标准差 9.9)岁,大多数为女性(237/378,62.7%)。超过 7000 人使用该应用程序进行了登记,20% 的人被转介到当地的 COVID-19 检测机构。根据社区保健员的报告,每个社区保健员筛查的人数中位数从尼亚鲁根格的 152 人(IQR 70-276)到鲁西齐的 24 人(IQR 16-90)不等。城市地区的 COVID-19 阳性率高于农村地区:Gasabo 有一半以上的社区保健员报告了确诊阳性病例,而 Kirehe 和 Rusizi 则分别只有 2.4% 和 15.4%。尽管该应用程序是一种新型工具,但社区保健工作者非常了解这种工具的用途,并对其抱有适当的期望。接受度和满意度都非常高,但城市和农村地区之间存在差异。Nyarugenge(72.8/100)和 Gasabo(80.7/100)的满意度高于 Kirehe(61.6/100)和 Rusizi(64.5/100)。超过 80% 的社区保健员愿意继续使用 e-ASCov 应用程序,但基雷赫(56.7%)的社区保健员除外。该应用程序被视为一种工具,可生成有关 COVID-19 的信息、通报疫情状况并帮助遏制疫情在卢旺达的蔓延。社区保健工作者对该应用程序在其所在地区实施的各个阶段都表示满意:在这项概念验证研究中,用于筛查 COVID-19 的智能手机应用程序作为移动医疗工具对社区保健员非常有用,有可能在流行病环境中提高医疗系统的效率。无论是在流行病情况下,还是在考虑到社区层面的某些条件的情况下,都应对全国范围内的推广情况进行分析。需要了解此类应用程序的推广条件和在其他卫生条件下的可移植性,以便在金字塔式的卫生系统中充分发挥社区保健员的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信