Comparing rates of recurrent infection for first occurrence of Clostridioides difficile between tapered oral vancomycin and standard vancomycin: a retrospective, propensity matched cohort study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sarah E Moore, Matthew Song, Elena A Swingler, Stephen Furmanek, Thomas Chandler, Dakota Smith, Martin T Brenneman, Ashley M Wilde
{"title":"Comparing rates of recurrent infection for first occurrence of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> between tapered oral vancomycin and standard vancomycin: a retrospective, propensity matched cohort study.","authors":"Sarah E Moore, Matthew Song, Elena A Swingler, Stephen Furmanek, Thomas Chandler, Dakota Smith, Martin T Brenneman, Ashley M Wilde","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare rates of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) recurrence following initial occurrence treated with tapered enteral vancomycin compared to standard vancomycin.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community health system.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults ≥18 years of age hospitalized with positive <i>C. difficile</i> polymerase chain reaction or toxin enzyme immunoassay who were prescribed either standard 10-14 days of enteral vancomycin four times daily or a 12-week tapered vancomycin regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective propensity score pair matched cohort study. Groups were matched based on age < or ≥ 65 years and receipt of non-<i>C. difficile</i> antibiotics during hospitalization or within 6 months post-discharge. Recurrence rates were analyzed via logistic regression conditioned on matched pairs and reported as conditional odds ratios. The primary outcome was recurrence rates compared between standard vancomycin versus tapered vancomycin for treatment of initial CDI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CDI recurrence rate at 6 months was 5.3% (4/75) in the taper cohort versus 28% (21/75) in the standard vancomycin cohort. The median time to CDI recurrence was 115 days versus 20 days in the taper and standard vancomycin cohorts, respectively. When adjusted for matching, patients in the taper arm were less likely to experience CDI recurrence at 6 months when compared to standard vancomycin (cOR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.56, <i>p</i> < 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Larger prospective trials are needed to elucidate the clinical utility of tapered oral vancomycin as a treatment option to achieve sustained clinical cure in first occurrences of CDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare rates of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recurrence following initial occurrence treated with tapered enteral vancomycin compared to standard vancomycin.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Community health system.

Patients: Adults ≥18 years of age hospitalized with positive C. difficile polymerase chain reaction or toxin enzyme immunoassay who were prescribed either standard 10-14 days of enteral vancomycin four times daily or a 12-week tapered vancomycin regimen.

Methods: Retrospective propensity score pair matched cohort study. Groups were matched based on age < or ≥ 65 years and receipt of non-C. difficile antibiotics during hospitalization or within 6 months post-discharge. Recurrence rates were analyzed via logistic regression conditioned on matched pairs and reported as conditional odds ratios. The primary outcome was recurrence rates compared between standard vancomycin versus tapered vancomycin for treatment of initial CDI.

Results: The CDI recurrence rate at 6 months was 5.3% (4/75) in the taper cohort versus 28% (21/75) in the standard vancomycin cohort. The median time to CDI recurrence was 115 days versus 20 days in the taper and standard vancomycin cohorts, respectively. When adjusted for matching, patients in the taper arm were less likely to experience CDI recurrence at 6 months when compared to standard vancomycin (cOR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.56, p < 0.002).

Conclusions: Larger prospective trials are needed to elucidate the clinical utility of tapered oral vancomycin as a treatment option to achieve sustained clinical cure in first occurrences of CDI.

比较减量口服万古霉素和标准万古霉素首次感染艰难梭菌的复发率:一项倾向匹配队列回顾性研究。
目的比较难辨梭状芽孢杆菌感染(CDI)初次发生后使用渐进式肠内万古霉素治疗与标准万古霉素治疗的复发率:设计:回顾性队列研究:环境:社区卫生系统:患者:年龄≥18岁、艰难梭菌聚合酶链反应或毒素酶免疫测定呈阳性的住院成人,处方为每日4次、每次10-14天的标准万古霉素肠内注射或为期12周的渐进万古霉素治疗方案:回顾性倾向得分配对队列研究。根据年龄小于或大于 65 岁以及住院期间或出院后 6 个月内接受过非艰难梭菌抗生素治疗的情况进行配对。复发率通过以配对为条件的逻辑回归进行分析,并以条件几率比进行报告。主要结果是比较标准万古霉素与减量万古霉素治疗初次 CDI 的复发率:结果:6个月时,减量万古霉素队列中的CDI复发率为5.3%(4/75),而标准万古霉素队列中的复发率为28%(21/75)。减量组和标准万古霉素组的 CDI 复发中位时间分别为 115 天和 20 天。经匹配调整后,与标准万古霉素相比,减量治疗组患者在6个月后复发CDI的可能性更小(cOR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.56, p < 0.002):需要更大规模的前瞻性试验来阐明减量口服万古霉素作为一种治疗方案的临床效用,以实现首次发生 CDI 时的持续临床治愈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信