Treatment outcomes of mild to moderate Clostridioides difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: an Australian experience.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rachael Jacob, Virginia Chu, Watson Ng, Astrid-Jane Williams, Susan Connor
{"title":"Treatment outcomes of mild to moderate Clostridioides difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: an Australian experience.","authors":"Rachael Jacob, Virginia Chu, Watson Ng, Astrid-Jane Williams, Susan Connor","doi":"10.1111/imj.16545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising and associated with adverse outcomes. Optimal treatment for CDI in IBD remains unknown, with various organisations suggesting vancomycin as first-line therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare treatment outcomes for metronidazole versus vancomycin in mild to moderate CDI in IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of IBD patients with CDI between January 2015 and December 2019 was conducted. Laboratory data and clinical outcomes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven discrete episodes of CDI in 34 patients occurred during the study period. Fifty-three per cent (18) had Crohn's disease, 44% (15) ulcerative colitis and 3% (1) IBD unclassified. Six per cent (3/47) of CDI cases were severe and excluded. In 68% (30/44) of mild to moderate CDI, metronidazole was prescribed, with treatment failure in 20% (6/30), CDI recurrence in 13% (4/30) and 20% (6/30) experiencing a further CDI episode. Comparatively, vancomycin was prescribed in 23% (10/44) without any treatment failures; however, 10% (1/10) had CDI recurrence and 40% (4/10) experienced another CDI episode. No statistically significant difference was noted between metronidazole and vancomycin therapy for treatment failure (P = 0.31), CDI recurrence (P = 1.0) or further CDI episodes (P = 0.23). Proton-pump inhibitor therapy was the only risk factor associated with a higher rate of the composite outcome and remained significant on multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio 12.99 (95% confidence interval = 1.21-139.97), P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Metronidazole compared to vancomycin for treatment of mild to moderate CDI in IBD is effective however may be associated with higher rates of treatment failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising and associated with adverse outcomes. Optimal treatment for CDI in IBD remains unknown, with various organisations suggesting vancomycin as first-line therapy.

Aim: To compare treatment outcomes for metronidazole versus vancomycin in mild to moderate CDI in IBD.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of IBD patients with CDI between January 2015 and December 2019 was conducted. Laboratory data and clinical outcomes were examined.

Results: Forty-seven discrete episodes of CDI in 34 patients occurred during the study period. Fifty-three per cent (18) had Crohn's disease, 44% (15) ulcerative colitis and 3% (1) IBD unclassified. Six per cent (3/47) of CDI cases were severe and excluded. In 68% (30/44) of mild to moderate CDI, metronidazole was prescribed, with treatment failure in 20% (6/30), CDI recurrence in 13% (4/30) and 20% (6/30) experiencing a further CDI episode. Comparatively, vancomycin was prescribed in 23% (10/44) without any treatment failures; however, 10% (1/10) had CDI recurrence and 40% (4/10) experienced another CDI episode. No statistically significant difference was noted between metronidazole and vancomycin therapy for treatment failure (P = 0.31), CDI recurrence (P = 1.0) or further CDI episodes (P = 0.23). Proton-pump inhibitor therapy was the only risk factor associated with a higher rate of the composite outcome and remained significant on multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio 12.99 (95% confidence interval = 1.21-139.97), P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Metronidazole compared to vancomycin for treatment of mild to moderate CDI in IBD is effective however may be associated with higher rates of treatment failure.

炎症性肠病中轻度至中度艰难梭菌感染的治疗效果:澳大利亚的经验。
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)中艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的发病率正在上升,并与不良后果相关。目的:比较甲硝唑与万古霉素治疗 IBD 轻度至中度 CDI 的疗效:对2015年1月至2019年12月期间患有CDI的IBD患者进行回顾性分析。对实验室数据和临床结果进行了研究:研究期间,34 名患者发生了 47 次不连续的 CDI。53%(18 人)患有克罗恩病,44%(15 人)患有溃疡性结肠炎,3%(1 人)患有未分类的 IBD。6%(3/47)的 CDI 病例病情严重,被排除在外。68%(30/44)的轻度至中度 CDI 病例使用了甲硝唑,20%(6/30)的病例治疗失败,13%(4/30)的病例 CDI 复发,20%(6/30)的病例 CDI 再次发作。相比之下,23%(10/44)的患者使用了万古霉素,但没有出现治疗失败;不过,10%(1/10)的患者 CDI 复发,40%(4/10)的患者 CDI 再次发作。甲硝唑和万古霉素疗法在治疗失败(P = 0.31)、CDI 复发(P = 1.0)或 CDI 再次发作(P = 0.23)方面无统计学差异。质子泵抑制剂治疗是唯一与较高的综合结果发生率相关的风险因素,并且在多变量逻辑回归中仍然显著(几率比12.99(95%置信区间=1.21-139.97),P=0.03):甲硝唑与万古霉素相比,治疗IBD轻中度CDI效果显著,但治疗失败率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信