Corticosteroid Use in Randomized Clinical Trials of Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bruno César da Silva, Sam Papasotiriou, Stephen B Hanauer
{"title":"Corticosteroid Use in Randomized Clinical Trials of Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Bruno César da Silva, Sam Papasotiriou, Stephen B Hanauer","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izae240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This systematic review aims to elucidate the use of corticosteroids in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating biologics and small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed corticosteroid use during both the induction and maintenance phases, highlighting areas needing standardization and improvement in clinical research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected placebo-controlled phase 3 RCTs involving adults with moderate to severe IBD. These studies included detailed reports on corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance phases, with clinical remission and/or corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CR) as primary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 324 studies were identified and refined to 26 RCTs after screening. Analysis revealed variability in corticosteroid administration. Over time, corticosteroid use showed a decreasing trend (Spearman ρ = -0.42, P = .045). Studies allowing higher corticosteroid doses (up to 40 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) reported a higher proportion of corticosteroid users (51.8%, range: 42.9%-61%) compared to those excluding patients on doses >20 mg/day (37.5%, range: 31.6%-51.8%; P = .007) or >30 mg/day (41.1%, range: 29.6%-53.7%; P = .023). Trials with mandatory tapering protocols showed a narrower gap between overall clinical remission and CSF-CR rates, with an average difference of 6% in the group without mandatory tapering and 1.2% in the group with forced tapering (T-test P = .038; Cohen's d ≈ 1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the variability in corticosteroid use across RCTs and its impact on evaluating new IBD therapies. Standardizing tapering protocols and defining CSF-CR are essential for accurate outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1430-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This systematic review aims to elucidate the use of corticosteroids in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating biologics and small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed corticosteroid use during both the induction and maintenance phases, highlighting areas needing standardization and improvement in clinical research.

Methods: We selected placebo-controlled phase 3 RCTs involving adults with moderate to severe IBD. These studies included detailed reports on corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance phases, with clinical remission and/or corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CR) as primary endpoints.

Results: Initially, 324 studies were identified and refined to 26 RCTs after screening. Analysis revealed variability in corticosteroid administration. Over time, corticosteroid use showed a decreasing trend (Spearman ρ = -0.42, P = .045). Studies allowing higher corticosteroid doses (up to 40 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) reported a higher proportion of corticosteroid users (51.8%, range: 42.9%-61%) compared to those excluding patients on doses >20 mg/day (37.5%, range: 31.6%-51.8%; P = .007) or >30 mg/day (41.1%, range: 29.6%-53.7%; P = .023). Trials with mandatory tapering protocols showed a narrower gap between overall clinical remission and CSF-CR rates, with an average difference of 6% in the group without mandatory tapering and 1.2% in the group with forced tapering (T-test P = .038; Cohen's d ≈ 1.1).

Conclusions: This review highlights the variability in corticosteroid use across RCTs and its impact on evaluating new IBD therapies. Standardizing tapering protocols and defining CSF-CR are essential for accurate outcomes.

炎症性肠病生物制剂和小分子药物随机临床试验中皮质类固醇的使用:系统回顾
背景和目的:本系统综述旨在阐明在评估治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的生物制剂和小分子药物的随机临床试验(RCT)中皮质类固醇的使用情况。我们分析了皮质类固醇在诱导和维持阶段的使用情况,强调了临床研究中需要标准化和改进的领域:我们选择了中重度 IBD 成人患者参与的安慰剂对照 3 期 RCT 研究。这些研究包括在诱导和维持阶段使用皮质类固醇的详细报告,以临床缓解和/或无皮质类固醇临床缓解(CSF-CR)作为主要终点:结果:最初确定了 324 项研究,经过筛选,最终确定了 26 项 RCT。分析显示,皮质类固醇用药存在差异。随着时间的推移,皮质类固醇的使用呈下降趋势(Spearman ρ = -0.42,P = .045)。与排除剂量大于 20 毫克/天(37.5%,范围:31.6%-51.8%;P = .007)或大于 30 毫克/天(41.1%,范围:29.6%-53.7%;P = .023)的患者相比,允许使用更高皮质类固醇剂量(泼尼松或同等剂量最高达 40 毫克/天)的研究报告了更高比例的皮质类固醇使用者(51.8%,范围:42.9%-61%)。采用强制减量方案的试验显示,总体临床缓解率和CSF-CR率之间的差距较小,未采用强制减量方案组的平均差距为6%,而采用强制减量方案组的平均差距为1.2%(T检验 P = .038;Cohen's d ≈ 1.1):本综述强调了不同RCT中皮质类固醇激素使用的差异性及其对评估IBD新疗法的影响。规范减量方案和定义 CSF-CR 对于获得准确的结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信