Accessing the Impact of TikTok's Algorithm on Regional Inequality in Health Information.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jinhui Li, Wen Shi
{"title":"Accessing the Impact of TikTok's Algorithm on Regional Inequality in Health Information.","authors":"Jinhui Li, Wen Shi","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2414882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to audit the potential algorithmic bias in TikTok's health-related video recommendation toward geographically diverse groups in China. We employed 120 cloud phones and conducted two agent-based testing experiments simulating users' geographical locations and online behaviors. The results indicated significant regional inequality in video sources recommended by the TikTok algorithm, <i>t</i>(118) = 3.02, <i>p</i> = .003, with users from developed cities encountering a higher proportion of professional videos than those from underdeveloped cities. However, when users from both regions expressed a similar preference for the same type of information, an equal proportion of professional videos was recommended. Our findings suggest that widely used algorithms may covertly perpetuate social inequities and reinforce preexisting class-based inequalities, particularly affecting vulnerable population from low-income regions. This study also highlights the importance of enhancing eHealth literacy among disadvantaged users to mitigate problematic outcomes in the AI-based communication landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2414882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to audit the potential algorithmic bias in TikTok's health-related video recommendation toward geographically diverse groups in China. We employed 120 cloud phones and conducted two agent-based testing experiments simulating users' geographical locations and online behaviors. The results indicated significant regional inequality in video sources recommended by the TikTok algorithm, t(118) = 3.02, p = .003, with users from developed cities encountering a higher proportion of professional videos than those from underdeveloped cities. However, when users from both regions expressed a similar preference for the same type of information, an equal proportion of professional videos was recommended. Our findings suggest that widely used algorithms may covertly perpetuate social inequities and reinforce preexisting class-based inequalities, particularly affecting vulnerable population from low-income regions. This study also highlights the importance of enhancing eHealth literacy among disadvantaged users to mitigate problematic outcomes in the AI-based communication landscape.

获取 TikTok 算法对地区卫生信息不平等的影响。
本研究旨在分析 TikTok 向中国不同地域群体推荐健康相关视频时可能存在的算法偏差。我们使用了 120 部云手机,并模拟用户的地理位置和上网行为进行了两次基于代理的测试实验。结果表明,TikTok算法推荐的视频来源存在明显的地域不平等,t(118) = 3.02, p = .003,发达城市用户接触到的专业视频比例高于欠发达城市用户。然而,当两个地区的用户对同类型信息的偏好相似时,推荐的专业视频比例相同。我们的研究结果表明,广泛使用的算法可能会暗中延续社会不公平现象,并强化已有的基于阶级的不平等,尤其会影响低收入地区的弱势群体。这项研究还强调了提高弱势用户的电子健康素养以减少人工智能通信环境中的问题结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信