Mining and analysis of adverse event signals for alendronate based on the real-world data of FDA adverse event reporting system database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ziyi Zhao, Hongxiang Ji, Chenghao Zhang, Zhengdan Wang, Shengquan Ren, Chunlei Liu, Caifeng Wu, Jian Wang, Xiaoheng Ding
{"title":"Mining and analysis of adverse event signals for alendronate based on the real-world data of FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Ziyi Zhao, Hongxiang Ji, Chenghao Zhang, Zhengdan Wang, Shengquan Ren, Chunlei Liu, Caifeng Wu, Jian Wang, Xiaoheng Ding","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2419995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study aims to assess alendronate-related adverse events (AEs) from the US FDA adverse event reporting system database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AE data associated with alendronate between the first quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2024 were selected. Various signal quantification methods, including the ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM, were applied for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 34,943 reports where alendronate was the primary suspected drug for the AE, 24 affected system organ classes and 1046 significant preferred terms were identified in this study. Several significant AEs beyond drug instructions with strong signals were determined, including low turnover osteopathy, fracture delayed union, fracture nonunion, loss of anatomical alignment after fracture reduction, fracture malunion, periprosthetic fracture, carotid bruit, oral fibroma, traumatic occlusion, and phlebolith. The median time to onset of alendronate-related AEs was 306 days (interquartile range [IQR] 12-1,461 days), and the majority of cases occurred 2 years later (18.80%) and within 30 days (14.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study detected multiple potential new AE signals for alendronate, and more clinical research is required to further validate our results and clarify their associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2419995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our study aims to assess alendronate-related adverse events (AEs) from the US FDA adverse event reporting system database.

Methods: The AE data associated with alendronate between the first quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2024 were selected. Various signal quantification methods, including the ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM, were applied for analysis.

Results: In 34,943 reports where alendronate was the primary suspected drug for the AE, 24 affected system organ classes and 1046 significant preferred terms were identified in this study. Several significant AEs beyond drug instructions with strong signals were determined, including low turnover osteopathy, fracture delayed union, fracture nonunion, loss of anatomical alignment after fracture reduction, fracture malunion, periprosthetic fracture, carotid bruit, oral fibroma, traumatic occlusion, and phlebolith. The median time to onset of alendronate-related AEs was 306 days (interquartile range [IQR] 12-1,461 days), and the majority of cases occurred 2 years later (18.80%) and within 30 days (14.49%).

Conclusions: The current study detected multiple potential new AE signals for alendronate, and more clinical research is required to further validate our results and clarify their associations.

基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界数据,挖掘和分析阿仑膦酸钠的不良事件信号。
研究目的我们的研究旨在评估美国 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库中与阿仑膦酸钠相关的不良事件(AEs):方法:选取 2004 年第一季度至 2024 年第一季度与阿仑膦酸钠相关的 AE 数据。应用各种信号量化方法进行分析,包括 ROR、PRR、BCPNN 和 EBGM:在 34,943 份阿仑膦酸钠为 AE 主要可疑药物的报告中,本研究确定了 24 个受影响的系统器官类别和 1046 个重要首选术语。除药物说明书外,还确定了几种具有强烈信号的重要 AE,包括低翻转骨病、骨折延迟愈合、骨折不愈合、骨折复位后解剖对位丧失、骨折错位、假体周围骨折、颈动脉淤血、口腔纤维瘤、创伤性闭塞和静脉结石。阿仑膦酸盐相关AE的中位发病时间为306天(四分位距[IQR] 12-1,461天),大多数病例发生在2年后(18.80%)和30天内(14.49%):目前的研究发现了阿仑膦酸钠多种潜在的新 AE 信号,还需要更多的临床研究来进一步验证我们的结果并明确其关联性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信