Superior Prophylactic Effectiveness of a Recombinant FVIIIFc Over Standard Half-Life FVIII in Hemophilia A: A-SURE Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Johannes Oldenburg, Charles Hay, Flora Peyvandi, Annarita Tagliaferri, Pål Andrè Holme, María Teresa Álvarez-Román, Christine Biron-Andréani, Håkan Malmström, Linda Bystrická, Stefan Lethagen
{"title":"Superior Prophylactic Effectiveness of a Recombinant FVIIIFc Over Standard Half-Life FVIII in Hemophilia A: A-SURE Study.","authors":"Johannes Oldenburg, Charles Hay, Flora Peyvandi, Annarita Tagliaferri, Pål Andrè Holme, María Teresa Álvarez-Román, Christine Biron-Andréani, Håkan Malmström, Linda Bystrická, Stefan Lethagen","doi":"10.1111/ejh.14309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, European multicenter A-SURE study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of prophylaxis using an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) Fc fusion protein, efmoroctocog alfa (hereinafter rFVIIIFc), compared with prophylaxis using standard half-life (SHL) FVIII products in patients with hemophilia A.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary endpoints were annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized injection frequency, and annualized factor consumption. A comparative study design unique for an observational hemophilia study was implemented to reduce potential confounding in effectiveness estimates, wherein each patient prescribed rFVIIIFc was matched with one receiving SHL FVIII. Propensity scores were used for adjustment in statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outcomes for all primary endpoints were significantly better in the rFVIIIFc group (n = 184) compared with the SHL FVIII group (n = 170): mean ABR 1.5 versus 2.3 (difference of -0.8; p = 0.0147); mean annualized injection frequency 114.4 versus 169.2 (difference of -54.8; p < 0.0001); and mean annualized factor consumption 243 024.2 versus 288 718.6 International Units (difference of 45 694.5; p = 0.0003). rFVIIIFc was well tolerated, with no inhibitor development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rFVIIIFc has superior prophylactic effectiveness versus SHL FVIII, providing higher bleed protection with fewer injections and lower factor consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":11955,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, European multicenter A-SURE study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of prophylaxis using an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) Fc fusion protein, efmoroctocog alfa (hereinafter rFVIIIFc), compared with prophylaxis using standard half-life (SHL) FVIII products in patients with hemophilia A.

Methods: Primary endpoints were annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized injection frequency, and annualized factor consumption. A comparative study design unique for an observational hemophilia study was implemented to reduce potential confounding in effectiveness estimates, wherein each patient prescribed rFVIIIFc was matched with one receiving SHL FVIII. Propensity scores were used for adjustment in statistical analyses.

Results: Outcomes for all primary endpoints were significantly better in the rFVIIIFc group (n = 184) compared with the SHL FVIII group (n = 170): mean ABR 1.5 versus 2.3 (difference of -0.8; p = 0.0147); mean annualized injection frequency 114.4 versus 169.2 (difference of -54.8; p < 0.0001); and mean annualized factor consumption 243 024.2 versus 288 718.6 International Units (difference of 45 694.5; p = 0.0003). rFVIIIFc was well tolerated, with no inhibitor development.

Conclusions: rFVIIIFc has superior prophylactic effectiveness versus SHL FVIII, providing higher bleed protection with fewer injections and lower factor consumption.

重组 FVIIIFc 对 A 型血友病的预防效果优于标准半衰期 FVIII:A-SURE 研究。
研究目的这项为期 24 个月的前瞻性、非干预性欧洲多中心 A-SURE 研究评估了在 A 型血友病患者中使用延长半衰期重组因子 VIII (FVIII) Fc 融合蛋白 efmoroctocog alfa(以下简称 rFVIIIFc)与使用标准半衰期 (SHL) FVIII 产品进行预防治疗的实际效果:主要终点是年出血率(ABR)、年注射频率和年因子消耗量。为了减少疗效评估中潜在的混杂因素,我们采用了血友病观察性研究中独有的比较研究设计,即每位接受 rFVIIIFc 治疗的患者与接受 SHL FVIII 治疗的患者进行配对。统计分析中使用倾向评分进行调整:结果:与 SHL FVIII 组(n = 170)相比,rFVIIIFc 组(n = 184)的所有主要终点结果都明显更好:平均 ABR 为 1.5 对 2.3(差异为 -0.8;p = 0.0147);平均年注射次数为 114.4 对 169.2(差异为 -54.8;p 结论:rFVIIIFc 的预防效果优于 SHL FVIII,它能以更少的注射次数和更低的因子消耗提供更高的出血保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Haematology is an international journal for communication of basic and clinical research in haematology. The journal welcomes manuscripts on molecular, cellular and clinical research on diseases of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue, and on basic molecular and cellular research related to normal development and function of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue. The journal also welcomes reviews on clinical haematology and basic research, case reports, and clinical pictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信