Impella malrotation affects left ventricle unloading in cardiogenic shock patients.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Luca Baldetti, Davide Romagnolo, Mariagiulia Festi, Alessandro Beneduce, Davide Gurrieri, Beatrice Peveri, André Frias, Mario Gramegna, Stefania Sacchi, Lorenzo Cianfanelli, Francesco Calvo, Vittorio Pazzanese, Alaide Chieffo, Silvia Ajello, Anna Mara Scandroglio
{"title":"Impella malrotation affects left ventricle unloading in cardiogenic shock patients.","authors":"Luca Baldetti, Davide Romagnolo, Mariagiulia Festi, Alessandro Beneduce, Davide Gurrieri, Beatrice Peveri, André Frias, Mario Gramegna, Stefania Sacchi, Lorenzo Cianfanelli, Francesco Calvo, Vittorio Pazzanese, Alaide Chieffo, Silvia Ajello, Anna Mara Scandroglio","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Impella malrotation-inlet orientation away from the left ventricular (LV) apex with normal console waveforms and proper device depth-is commonly observed and possibly associated worse haemodynamics. This study aimed to characterize the haemodynamic consequences of Impella malrotation in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included 100 CS patients (60 ± 12 years; 79.0% males) with available echocardiography during Impella support and pulmonary artery catheter assessment before and during (at 48 h) Impella support. Impella malrotation was identified in 36%. At 48 h, malrotation patients had higher pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP, 16.0 ± 8.2 vs. 13.0 ± 4.6 mmHg; P = 0.033), higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP, 35.0 ± 11.3 vs. 29.5 ± 9.0 mmHg; P = 0.015), higher diastolic-PAP (19.3 ± 8.1 vs. 15.1 ± 6.1 mmHg; P = 0.007), higher mean-PAP (25.7 ± 9.1 vs. 20.8 ± 6.8 mmHg; P = 0.005), higher right atrial pressure (10.3 ± 4.8 vs. 7.7 ± 4.3 mmHg; P = 0.009), higher pulmonary vascular resistance index (4.78 ± 2.75 vs. 3.49 ± 1.94 WUm<sup>2</sup>; P = 0.020) and higher pulmonary artery elastance (0.91 ± 0.60 vs. 0.67 ± 0.40 mmHg/mL; P = 0.045). Serum lactate at 48 h was higher in malrotation patients (6.63 ± 6.25 vs. 3.60 ± 4.21 mmol/L; P = 0.004). Malrotation patients presented larger LVEDD during support (52 ± 10 vs. 46 ± 11 mm; P = 0.006), higher rates of aortic regurgitation (AR, 86 vs. 56%; P = 0.004) and higher increase in AR severity (+0.94 ± 0.92 vs. + 0.46 ± 0.95; P = 0.016). No significant differences were found in major adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CS patients, Impella malrotation is associated with suboptimal unloading of the LV, worse pulmonary haemodynamics and worse indexes of right ventricular afterload.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Impella malrotation-inlet orientation away from the left ventricular (LV) apex with normal console waveforms and proper device depth-is commonly observed and possibly associated worse haemodynamics. This study aimed to characterize the haemodynamic consequences of Impella malrotation in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients.

Methods and results: We included 100 CS patients (60 ± 12 years; 79.0% males) with available echocardiography during Impella support and pulmonary artery catheter assessment before and during (at 48 h) Impella support. Impella malrotation was identified in 36%. At 48 h, malrotation patients had higher pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP, 16.0 ± 8.2 vs. 13.0 ± 4.6 mmHg; P = 0.033), higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP, 35.0 ± 11.3 vs. 29.5 ± 9.0 mmHg; P = 0.015), higher diastolic-PAP (19.3 ± 8.1 vs. 15.1 ± 6.1 mmHg; P = 0.007), higher mean-PAP (25.7 ± 9.1 vs. 20.8 ± 6.8 mmHg; P = 0.005), higher right atrial pressure (10.3 ± 4.8 vs. 7.7 ± 4.3 mmHg; P = 0.009), higher pulmonary vascular resistance index (4.78 ± 2.75 vs. 3.49 ± 1.94 WUm2; P = 0.020) and higher pulmonary artery elastance (0.91 ± 0.60 vs. 0.67 ± 0.40 mmHg/mL; P = 0.045). Serum lactate at 48 h was higher in malrotation patients (6.63 ± 6.25 vs. 3.60 ± 4.21 mmol/L; P = 0.004). Malrotation patients presented larger LVEDD during support (52 ± 10 vs. 46 ± 11 mm; P = 0.006), higher rates of aortic regurgitation (AR, 86 vs. 56%; P = 0.004) and higher increase in AR severity (+0.94 ± 0.92 vs. + 0.46 ± 0.95; P = 0.016). No significant differences were found in major adverse outcomes.

Conclusions: In CS patients, Impella malrotation is associated with suboptimal unloading of the LV, worse pulmonary haemodynamics and worse indexes of right ventricular afterload.

Impella旋转不良会影响心源性休克患者的左心室卸荷。
目的:在控制台波形正常和设备深度合适的情况下,Impella 错位--入口方向偏离左心室(LV)心尖--是常见现象,可能与血流动力学恶化有关。本研究旨在描述心源性休克(CS)患者因Impella旋转不良而导致的血流动力学后果:我们纳入了 100 名 CS 患者(60 ± 12 岁;79.0% 男性),他们在 Impella 支持期间接受了超声心动图检查,并在 Impella 支持之前和期间(48 小时)接受了肺动脉导管评估。36%的患者发现了Impella旋转不良。48 小时后,旋转不良患者的肺动脉楔压(PAWP, 16.0 ± 8.2 vs. 13.0 ± 4.6 mmHg; P = 0.033)、肺动脉收缩压(PAP, 35.0 ± 11.3 vs. 29.5 ± 9.0 mmHg; P = 0.015)、更高的舒张压(19.3 ± 8.1 vs. 15.1 ± 6.1 mmHg; P = 0.007)、更高的平均肺动脉压(25.7 ± 9.1 vs. 20.8 ± 6.8 mmHg; P = 0.005)、更高的右心房压力(10.3 ± 4.8 vs. 7.7 ± 4.3 mmHg; P = 0.009)、更高的肺血管阻力指数(4.78 ± 2.75 vs. 3.49 ± 1.94 WUm2;P = 0.020)和更高的肺动脉弹性(0.91 ± 0.60 vs. 0.67 ± 0.40 mmHg/mL;P = 0.045)。肠旋转不良患者 48 小时后的血清乳酸较高(6.63 ± 6.25 vs. 3.60 ± 4.21 mmol/L;P = 0.004)。支持期间,旋转不良患者的 LVEDD 更大(52 ± 10 vs. 46 ± 11 mm;P = 0.006),主动脉瓣反流率更高(AR,86 vs. 56%;P = 0.004),AR 严重程度的增加也更高(+0.94 ± 0.92 vs. + 0.46 ± 0.95;P = 0.016)。在主要不良后果方面没有发现明显差异:结论:在CS患者中,Impella旋转不良与左心室卸载不理想、肺血流动力学恶化和右心室后负荷指数恶化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信