{"title":"Source apportionment and ecological risk assessment of antibiotics in Dafeng River Basin using PMF and Monte-Carlo simulation.","authors":"Jinqiu Song, Rongle Xu, Denghui Li, Shuaifeng Jiang, MaoMao Cai, Jianhua Xiong","doi":"10.1007/s10653-024-02252-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotics, prevalent in aquatic ecosystems, pose a grave threat to human health and the ecological well-being. This paper performed a case study on Dafeng River Basin in southern China. Specifically, techniques including positive matrix factorization (PFM) and Monte-Carlo simulation were employed to comprehensively investigate the spatial variations, possible sources, and ecological risks of antibiotics in four groups: sulfonamides (SAs), macrolides (MLs), quinolones (QNs), and tetracyclines (TCs). The major findings were as follows: first, 43 and 39 antibiotics were detected in the surface water and sediments of the basin, respectively, where the respective total content were ND-490.08 ng/L and ND-144.34 μg/kg, and the QNs and TCs were the two dominating groups. Second, the highest antibiotic content in surface water (441.43 ng/L) was observed in the midstream area, whereas the highest concentration in sediments (68.41 μg/kg) was found in the upstream region. Third, the investigation identified five sources of antibiotics discharged to surface water: domestic sewage, agricultural drainage, livestock discharge, sewage treatment plants, and aquaculture; three sources were detected for antibiotics in sediments: aquaculture, sewage treatment plants, and livestock discharge. Fourth, QNs had a significantly higher ecological risk than the other three groups of antibiotics, and livestock discharge (31.4% contribution) and aquaculture (23.4% contribution) were the main sources of risks of antibiotic contamination in Dafeng River Basin. This study is expected to provide some reference for control and risk management of antibiotic pollution in Dafeng River Basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"46 11","pages":"479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02252-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antibiotics, prevalent in aquatic ecosystems, pose a grave threat to human health and the ecological well-being. This paper performed a case study on Dafeng River Basin in southern China. Specifically, techniques including positive matrix factorization (PFM) and Monte-Carlo simulation were employed to comprehensively investigate the spatial variations, possible sources, and ecological risks of antibiotics in four groups: sulfonamides (SAs), macrolides (MLs), quinolones (QNs), and tetracyclines (TCs). The major findings were as follows: first, 43 and 39 antibiotics were detected in the surface water and sediments of the basin, respectively, where the respective total content were ND-490.08 ng/L and ND-144.34 μg/kg, and the QNs and TCs were the two dominating groups. Second, the highest antibiotic content in surface water (441.43 ng/L) was observed in the midstream area, whereas the highest concentration in sediments (68.41 μg/kg) was found in the upstream region. Third, the investigation identified five sources of antibiotics discharged to surface water: domestic sewage, agricultural drainage, livestock discharge, sewage treatment plants, and aquaculture; three sources were detected for antibiotics in sediments: aquaculture, sewage treatment plants, and livestock discharge. Fourth, QNs had a significantly higher ecological risk than the other three groups of antibiotics, and livestock discharge (31.4% contribution) and aquaculture (23.4% contribution) were the main sources of risks of antibiotic contamination in Dafeng River Basin. This study is expected to provide some reference for control and risk management of antibiotic pollution in Dafeng River Basin.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.