Impact of quinoa and food processing on gastrointestinal health: a narrative review.

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Devin Connolly, Jagrani Minj, Kevin M Murphy, Patrick M Solverson, Bret M Rust, Franck Carbonero
{"title":"Impact of quinoa and food processing on gastrointestinal health: a narrative review.","authors":"Devin Connolly, Jagrani Minj, Kevin M Murphy, Patrick M Solverson, Bret M Rust, Franck Carbonero","doi":"10.1080/10408398.2024.2416476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to exceptional nutritional quality, quinoa is an ideal candidate to solve food insecurity in many countries. Quinoa's profile of polyphenols, essential amino acids, and lipids make it ideal for digestive health. How the nutrient profile and bioavailability of quinoa metabolites differs across cooking methods such as heat, pressure, and time employed has yet to be elucidated. The objective of this review is to compile available research pertaining to the impact of various cooking methods on quinoa's nutritional properties with specific emphasis on how those properties affect gut health. Replacing small percentages of wheat flour with quinoa flour in baked bread increases the antioxidant activity, essential amino acids, fiber, minerals, and polyphenols. Extruding quinoa flour reduces amino acid, lipid, and polyphenol content of the raw seed, however direct quinoa and cereal grain extrudate comparisons are absent. Boiling quinoa leads to an increase of dietary fiber as well as exceptional retention of amino acids, lipids, and polyphenols. Baking and extruding with quinoa flour results in less optimal texture due to higher density, however minor substitutions can retain acceptable texture and even improve taste. Future research on quinoa's substitution in common processing methods will create equally desirable, yet more nutritious food products.</p>","PeriodicalId":10767,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2024.2416476","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to exceptional nutritional quality, quinoa is an ideal candidate to solve food insecurity in many countries. Quinoa's profile of polyphenols, essential amino acids, and lipids make it ideal for digestive health. How the nutrient profile and bioavailability of quinoa metabolites differs across cooking methods such as heat, pressure, and time employed has yet to be elucidated. The objective of this review is to compile available research pertaining to the impact of various cooking methods on quinoa's nutritional properties with specific emphasis on how those properties affect gut health. Replacing small percentages of wheat flour with quinoa flour in baked bread increases the antioxidant activity, essential amino acids, fiber, minerals, and polyphenols. Extruding quinoa flour reduces amino acid, lipid, and polyphenol content of the raw seed, however direct quinoa and cereal grain extrudate comparisons are absent. Boiling quinoa leads to an increase of dietary fiber as well as exceptional retention of amino acids, lipids, and polyphenols. Baking and extruding with quinoa flour results in less optimal texture due to higher density, however minor substitutions can retain acceptable texture and even improve taste. Future research on quinoa's substitution in common processing methods will create equally desirable, yet more nutritious food products.

藜麦和食品加工对肠胃健康的影响:叙述性综述。
藜麦营养丰富,是解决许多国家粮食不安全问题的理想选择。藜麦富含多酚、必需氨基酸和脂质,是促进消化系统健康的理想食物。藜麦代谢物的营养成分和生物利用率在不同的烹饪方法(如加热、加压和时间)下有何不同,还有待进一步阐明。本综述旨在汇集与各种烹饪方法对藜麦营养特性的影响有关的现有研究,并特别强调这些特性如何影响肠道健康。在烘焙面包中用藜麦粉替代小比例的小麦粉,可提高抗氧化活性、必需氨基酸、纤维、矿物质和多酚的含量。挤压藜麦粉会降低原种子中的氨基酸、脂质和多酚含量,但没有藜麦和谷物挤压物的直接比较。煮沸藜麦可增加膳食纤维,并能特别保留氨基酸、脂质和多酚。使用藜麦粉进行烘焙和挤压,由于密度较高,口感并不理想,但稍加替换就能保持可接受的口感,甚至改善口感。未来对藜麦在常见加工方法中的替代品的研究将创造出同样理想但更有营养的食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
600
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition serves as an authoritative outlet for critical perspectives on contemporary technology, food science, and human nutrition. With a specific focus on issues of national significance, particularly for food scientists, nutritionists, and health professionals, the journal delves into nutrition, functional foods, food safety, and food science and technology. Research areas span diverse topics such as diet and disease, antioxidants, allergenicity, microbiological concerns, flavor chemistry, nutrient roles and bioavailability, pesticides, toxic chemicals and regulation, risk assessment, food safety, and emerging food products, ingredients, and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信