The Impact of Lymphatic Drainage and Nerve Mobilization Techniques on Nerve Morphology in Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1177/02692155241289101
Emine Cihan, Merve Akdeniz Leblebicier, Cansu Sahbaz Pirincci, Fatima Yaman, Arzu Ture, Busra Ari, Berra Yamuc
{"title":"The Impact of Lymphatic Drainage and Nerve Mobilization Techniques on Nerve Morphology in Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Emine Cihan, Merve Akdeniz Leblebicier, Cansu Sahbaz Pirincci, Fatima Yaman, Arzu Ture, Busra Ari, Berra Yamuc","doi":"10.1177/02692155241289101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether nerve mobilization related to nerve mobility or the removal of edema using lymphatic drainage affects the cross-sectional area of the nerve, hand function, and symptom severity in carpal tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. Data were analyzed between groups using ANOVA, Chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Treatment lasted 4 weeks. Splint group wore the splint daily. Splint+manual lymphatic drainage received lymphatic drainage 5 days a week. Splint+nerve mobilization performed neuromobilization exercises as home exercises 5 days a week. Evaluations were conducted before and after 4 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study included 80 patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The patients were randomly divided into three groups: splint (<i>n</i> = 27), splint+manual lymphatic drainage (<i>n</i> = 27), or the splint+nerve mobilization (<i>n</i> = 26).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The main outcome measures were ultrasound assessments and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (Symptom Severity Scale and Boston Functional Status Scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the other groups, the nerve cross-sectional area decreased at both the carpal tunnel (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and mid-forearm (<i>p</i> = 0.014) levels in the drainage group. Nerve mobilization did not result in a significant change in the nerve cross-sectional area. All groups showed significant improvements in both symptom severity and functional status scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reduction of edema through lymphatic drainage contributes to a decrease in the cross-sectional area of the median nerve. Additionally, all three methods appear to positively impact the functional capacity of the hand and alleviate symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1633-1644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241289101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether nerve mobilization related to nerve mobility or the removal of edema using lymphatic drainage affects the cross-sectional area of the nerve, hand function, and symptom severity in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Design: The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. Data were analyzed between groups using ANOVA, Chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Setting: Treatment lasted 4 weeks. Splint group wore the splint daily. Splint+manual lymphatic drainage received lymphatic drainage 5 days a week. Splint+nerve mobilization performed neuromobilization exercises as home exercises 5 days a week. Evaluations were conducted before and after 4 weeks of treatment.

Participants: The study included 80 patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.

Interventions: The patients were randomly divided into three groups: splint (n = 27), splint+manual lymphatic drainage (n = 27), or the splint+nerve mobilization (n = 26).

Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures were ultrasound assessments and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (Symptom Severity Scale and Boston Functional Status Scale).

Results: Compared to the other groups, the nerve cross-sectional area decreased at both the carpal tunnel (p = 0.003) and mid-forearm (p = 0.014) levels in the drainage group. Nerve mobilization did not result in a significant change in the nerve cross-sectional area. All groups showed significant improvements in both symptom severity and functional status scores (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The reduction of edema through lymphatic drainage contributes to a decrease in the cross-sectional area of the median nerve. Additionally, all three methods appear to positively impact the functional capacity of the hand and alleviate symptoms.

淋巴引流和神经活动技术对轻中度腕管综合征患者神经形态的影响:随机对照试验
目的:研究与神经活动度相关的神经移动或利用淋巴引流消除水肿是否会影响腕管综合征的神经横截面积、手部功能和症状严重程度:研究与神经活动度相关的神经活动或利用淋巴引流消除水肿是否会影响腕管综合征患者的神经横截面积、手部功能和症状严重程度:本研究为前瞻性随机对照试验。数据分析采用方差分析、卡方检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验:治疗持续 4 周。夹板组每天佩戴夹板。夹板+人工淋巴引流组每周进行 5 天淋巴引流。夹板+神经活动训练每周5天在家中进行神经活动训练。在治疗前和治疗 4 周后进行评估:研究包括 80 名轻度至中度腕管综合征患者:患者被随机分为三组:夹板组(27 人)、夹板+人工淋巴引流组(27 人)或夹板+神经活动组(26 人):主要结果测量:超声评估和波士顿腕管问卷(症状严重程度量表和波士顿功能状态量表):与其他组相比,引流组的腕管(p = 0.003)和前臂中部(p = 0.014)神经横截面积均有所减少。神经活动组的神经横截面积没有显著变化。所有组的症状严重程度和功能状态评分均有明显改善(P通过淋巴引流减轻水肿有助于减少正中神经的横截面积。此外,这三种方法似乎都能对手部功能能力产生积极影响并缓解症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信