Cardiovascular adverse events associated with norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Abhishek Kandukuru, Priyanka Sharma, Sheeba Verghese Gupta, Augustine Nkembo, Vijaykumar Sutariya
{"title":"Cardiovascular adverse events associated with norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Abhishek Kandukuru, Priyanka Sharma, Sheeba Verghese Gupta, Augustine Nkembo, Vijaykumar Sutariya","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2024-0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Norepinephrine-dopamine reputake inhibitors (NDRIs), including bupropion, methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and reboxetine, are commonly prescribed for psychiatric disorders such as narcolepsy, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and depression. Cardiovascular adverse events have been reported to the FDA despite their effectiveness. This pharmacovigilance study analyzed cardiovascular adverse events associated with NDRIs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data from January 2004 to December 2021. A retrospective analysis of adverse event reports was conducted, employing time-trend analysis and disproportionality evaluation to assess cardiovascular risks. Bupropion had the greatest reported odds ratios (RORs) for tachycardia (ROR = 4.2, 95% CI: 4.0-4.4) and hypertension (ROR = 3.5, 95% CI: 3.3-3.7), while methylphenidate showed greater ROR for arrhythmias (ROR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.6-3.0) and palpitations (ROR = 3.1, 95% CI: 2.9-3.3). Reboxetine had signals for palpitations (ROR = 3.0, 95% CI: 2.8-3.2) and myocardial infarction (ROR = 2.7, 95% CI: 2.5-2.9), whereas atomoxetine revealed signals for hypertension (ROR = 2.9, 95% CI: 2.7-3.1) and syncope (ROR = 2.5, 95% CI: 2.3-2.7). Time-trend analysis revealed temporal variability in the cardiovascular risks connected with NDRIs. Our research elucidates cardiovascular safety profiles for NDRIs, highlighting the necessity for continuous pharmacovigilance. The observed variations in adverse events emphasize the need for ongoing surveillance to mitigate potential cardiovascular risks and enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9520,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"709-719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjpp-2024-0128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Norepinephrine-dopamine reputake inhibitors (NDRIs), including bupropion, methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and reboxetine, are commonly prescribed for psychiatric disorders such as narcolepsy, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and depression. Cardiovascular adverse events have been reported to the FDA despite their effectiveness. This pharmacovigilance study analyzed cardiovascular adverse events associated with NDRIs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data from January 2004 to December 2021. A retrospective analysis of adverse event reports was conducted, employing time-trend analysis and disproportionality evaluation to assess cardiovascular risks. Bupropion had the greatest reported odds ratios (RORs) for tachycardia (ROR = 4.2, 95% CI: 4.0-4.4) and hypertension (ROR = 3.5, 95% CI: 3.3-3.7), while methylphenidate showed greater ROR for arrhythmias (ROR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.6-3.0) and palpitations (ROR = 3.1, 95% CI: 2.9-3.3). Reboxetine had signals for palpitations (ROR = 3.0, 95% CI: 2.8-3.2) and myocardial infarction (ROR = 2.7, 95% CI: 2.5-2.9), whereas atomoxetine revealed signals for hypertension (ROR = 2.9, 95% CI: 2.7-3.1) and syncope (ROR = 2.5, 95% CI: 2.3-2.7). Time-trend analysis revealed temporal variability in the cardiovascular risks connected with NDRIs. Our research elucidates cardiovascular safety profiles for NDRIs, highlighting the necessity for continuous pharmacovigilance. The observed variations in adverse events emphasize the need for ongoing surveillance to mitigate potential cardiovascular risks and enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes.

与去甲肾上腺素-多巴胺再摄取抑制剂相关的心血管不良事件:美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统的药物警戒研究。
去甲肾上腺素-多巴胺还原抑制剂(NDRIs),包括安非他明、哌醋甲酯、阿托西汀和雷博西汀,是治疗嗜睡症、注意力缺陷/多动障碍和抑郁症等精神疾病的常用处方药。尽管这些药物疗效显著,但美国食品和药物管理局仍收到过心血管不良事件的报告。这项药物警戒研究利用美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统 2004 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月的数据,分析了与 NDRIs 相关的心血管不良事件。研究人员对不良事件报告进行了回顾性分析,采用时间趋势分析和比例失调评估来评估心血管风险。据报告,安非他酮在心动过速(ROR = 4.2,95% CI:4.0-4.4)和高血压(ROR = 3.5,95% CI:3.3-3.7)方面的几率比(ROR)最大,而哌醋甲酯在心律失常(ROR = 2.8,95% CI:2.6-3.0)和心悸(ROR = 3.1,95% CI:2.9-3.3)方面的几率比较大。瑞波西汀有心悸(ROR = 3.0,95% CI:2.8-3.2)和心肌梗死(ROR = 2.7,95% CI:2.5-2.9)的信号,而阿托莫西汀则有高血压(ROR = 2.9,95% CI:2.7-3.1)和晕厥(ROR = 2.5,95% CI:2.3-2.7)的信号。时间趋势分析显示了与 NDRIs 相关的心血管风险的时间变化。我们的研究阐明了NDRIs的心血管安全性概况,强调了持续药物警戒的必要性。观察到的不良事件变化强调了持续监测的必要性,以降低潜在的心血管风险,提高患者安全性和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1929, the Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology is a monthly journal that reports current research in all aspects of physiology, nutrition, pharmacology, and toxicology, contributed by recognized experts and scientists. It publishes symposium reviews and award lectures and occasionally dedicates entire issues or portions of issues to subjects of special interest to its international readership. The journal periodically publishes a “Made In Canada” special section that features invited review articles from internationally recognized scientists who have received some of their training in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信