Machine learning classification of archaea and bacteria identifies novel predictive genomic features.

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Tania Bobbo, Filippo Biscarini, Sachithra K Yaddehige, Leonardo Alberghini, Davide Rigoni, Nicoletta Bianchi, Cristian Taccioli
{"title":"Machine learning classification of archaea and bacteria identifies novel predictive genomic features.","authors":"Tania Bobbo, Filippo Biscarini, Sachithra K Yaddehige, Leonardo Alberghini, Davide Rigoni, Nicoletta Bianchi, Cristian Taccioli","doi":"10.1186/s12864-024-10832-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Archaea and Bacteria are distinct domains of life that are adapted to a variety of ecological niches. Several genome-based methods have been developed for their accurate classification, yet many aspects of the specific genomic features that determine these differences are not fully understood. In this study, we used publicly available whole-genome sequences from bacteria ( <math><mrow><mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2546</mn></mrow> </math> ) and archaea ( <math><mrow><mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>109</mn></mrow> </math> ). From these, a set of genomic features (nucleotide frequencies and proportions, coding sequences (CDS), non-coding, ribosomal and transfer RNA genes (ncRNA, rRNA, tRNA), Chargaff's, topological entropy and Shannon's entropy scores) was extracted and used as input data to develop machine learning models for the classification of archaea and bacteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The classification accuracy ranged from 0.993 (Random Forest) to 0.998 (Neural Networks). Over the four models, only 11 examples were misclassified, especially those belonging to the minority class (Archaea). From variable importance, tRNA topological and Shannon's entropy, nucleotide frequencies in tRNA, rRNA and ncRNA, CDS, tRNA and rRNA Chargaff's scores have emerged as the top discriminating factors. In particular, tRNA entropy (both topological and Shannon's) was the most important genomic feature for classification, pointing at the complex interactions between the genetic code, tRNAs and the translational machinery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>tRNA, rRNA and ncRNA genes emerged as the key genomic elements that underpin the classification of archaea and bacteria. In particular, higher nucleotide diversity was found in tRNA from bacteria compared to archaea. The analysis of the few classification errors reflects the complex phylogenetic relationships between bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10832-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Archaea and Bacteria are distinct domains of life that are adapted to a variety of ecological niches. Several genome-based methods have been developed for their accurate classification, yet many aspects of the specific genomic features that determine these differences are not fully understood. In this study, we used publicly available whole-genome sequences from bacteria ( N = 2546 ) and archaea ( N = 109 ). From these, a set of genomic features (nucleotide frequencies and proportions, coding sequences (CDS), non-coding, ribosomal and transfer RNA genes (ncRNA, rRNA, tRNA), Chargaff's, topological entropy and Shannon's entropy scores) was extracted and used as input data to develop machine learning models for the classification of archaea and bacteria.

Results: The classification accuracy ranged from 0.993 (Random Forest) to 0.998 (Neural Networks). Over the four models, only 11 examples were misclassified, especially those belonging to the minority class (Archaea). From variable importance, tRNA topological and Shannon's entropy, nucleotide frequencies in tRNA, rRNA and ncRNA, CDS, tRNA and rRNA Chargaff's scores have emerged as the top discriminating factors. In particular, tRNA entropy (both topological and Shannon's) was the most important genomic feature for classification, pointing at the complex interactions between the genetic code, tRNAs and the translational machinery.

Conclusions: tRNA, rRNA and ncRNA genes emerged as the key genomic elements that underpin the classification of archaea and bacteria. In particular, higher nucleotide diversity was found in tRNA from bacteria compared to archaea. The analysis of the few classification errors reflects the complex phylogenetic relationships between bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes.

古细菌和细菌的机器学习分类确定了新的预测性基因组特征。
背景:古细菌和细菌是适应各种生态位的不同生命领域。目前已开发出几种基于基因组的方法来对它们进行准确分类,但人们对决定这些差异的特定基因组特征的许多方面还不完全了解。在这项研究中,我们使用了可公开获得的细菌(N = 2546)和古菌(N = 109)的全基因组序列。从中提取了一组基因组特征(核苷酸频率和比例、编码序列(CDS)、非编码、核糖体和转运RNA基因(ncRNA、rRNA、tRNA)、Chargaff熵、拓扑熵和香农熵分数),并将其作为输入数据,用于开发古细菌和细菌分类的机器学习模型:分类准确率从 0.993(随机森林)到 0.998(神经网络)不等。在四个模型中,只有 11 个例子被错误分类,尤其是属于少数类(古菌)的例子。从变量重要性来看,tRNA 的拓扑熵和香农熵、tRNA、rRNA 和 ncRNA 中的核苷酸频率、CDS、tRNA 和 rRNA 的 Chargaff 分数成为最重要的判别因素。结论:tRNA、rRNA 和 ncRNA 基因是支持古细菌和细菌分类的关键基因组元素。与古细菌相比,细菌的 tRNA 的核苷酸多样性更高。对少数分类错误的分析反映了细菌、古菌和真核生物之间复杂的系统发育关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信