Organizational readiness to implement bundled interventions to increase HIV linkage and retention in care and treatment: results from the Black Women First (BWF) initiative.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Angela Wangari Walter, Minu P Mohan, Xiyuan Zhang, Melanie Rocco, Serena Rajabiun, Howard J Cabral, Clara A Chen, Esther Jennings, Julianne N Dugas, Talitha Dantas, Judith C Scott, Alicia Downes, Linda S Sprague Martinez
{"title":"Organizational readiness to implement bundled interventions to increase HIV linkage and retention in care and treatment: results from the Black Women First (BWF) initiative.","authors":"Angela Wangari Walter, Minu P Mohan, Xiyuan Zhang, Melanie Rocco, Serena Rajabiun, Howard J Cabral, Clara A Chen, Esther Jennings, Julianne N Dugas, Talitha Dantas, Judith C Scott, Alicia Downes, Linda S Sprague Martinez","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11568-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based and evidence-informed interventions designed to address gaps in the HIV care continuum have the potential to improve HIV care and treatment. However, inadequate organizational readiness can derail intervention uptake, prevent the integration of interventions, and contribute to suboptimal HIV treatment outcomes. This study sought to understand organizational readiness to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV and inform facilitators and barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed methods readiness assessment across 12 sites participating in the Black Women First (BWF) initiative to gauge preparedness to implement bundled interventions. Readiness was assessed using the organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) scale, and two open-ended questions examined facilitators and barriers. Associations between participant and organizational level factors were evaluated using linear models with clustering by site at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Pre-implementation interviews were conducted with staff virtually and transcripts were managed in NVivo. Directed content analysis was used to explore implementation barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sites demonstrated high levels of organizational readiness at baseline; overall organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) (mean 56.4, median 59, interquartile range [IQR] 5) and subscales of the ORIC change efficacy (mean 32.4, median 35, IQR 4), change commitment (mean 24, median 25, IQR 1), which is consistent with willingness and capability to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV. Organizational readiness remained high at 6- and 12-month follow-up periods. Staff role was significantly associated with organizational readiness (p = 0.007), change efficacy (p = 0.006), and change commitment (p = 0.020) at 6 months. Qualitative analysis indicated strategic planning and assessment (e.g., team coordination and the development of workflows to support implementation); organizational change through network weaving across silos within the organization, and communications systems that engage external partners, as well as resources available for hiring and training, supported readiness. Collaborative leadership and organizational buy-in, staff motivation, and partnerships facilitated implementation processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Organizations in the BWF initiative have high levels of organizational readiness reflecting willingness and capability to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV. Future research should examine the relationship between readiness and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11568-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based and evidence-informed interventions designed to address gaps in the HIV care continuum have the potential to improve HIV care and treatment. However, inadequate organizational readiness can derail intervention uptake, prevent the integration of interventions, and contribute to suboptimal HIV treatment outcomes. This study sought to understand organizational readiness to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV and inform facilitators and barriers to implementation.

Methods: We conducted a mixed methods readiness assessment across 12 sites participating in the Black Women First (BWF) initiative to gauge preparedness to implement bundled interventions. Readiness was assessed using the organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) scale, and two open-ended questions examined facilitators and barriers. Associations between participant and organizational level factors were evaluated using linear models with clustering by site at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Pre-implementation interviews were conducted with staff virtually and transcripts were managed in NVivo. Directed content analysis was used to explore implementation barriers and facilitators.

Findings: Sites demonstrated high levels of organizational readiness at baseline; overall organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) (mean 56.4, median 59, interquartile range [IQR] 5) and subscales of the ORIC change efficacy (mean 32.4, median 35, IQR 4), change commitment (mean 24, median 25, IQR 1), which is consistent with willingness and capability to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV. Organizational readiness remained high at 6- and 12-month follow-up periods. Staff role was significantly associated with organizational readiness (p = 0.007), change efficacy (p = 0.006), and change commitment (p = 0.020) at 6 months. Qualitative analysis indicated strategic planning and assessment (e.g., team coordination and the development of workflows to support implementation); organizational change through network weaving across silos within the organization, and communications systems that engage external partners, as well as resources available for hiring and training, supported readiness. Collaborative leadership and organizational buy-in, staff motivation, and partnerships facilitated implementation processes.

Conclusions: Organizations in the BWF initiative have high levels of organizational readiness reflecting willingness and capability to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV. Future research should examine the relationship between readiness and clinical outcomes.

组织实施捆绑干预措施以增加 HIV 护理和治疗的联系和保留率的准备情况:黑人妇女第一(BWF)倡议的结果。
背景:以证据为基础、以证据为依据的干预措施旨在解决艾滋病护理过程中存在的差距,具有改善艾滋病护理和治疗的潜力。然而,组织准备不足可能会影响干预措施的吸收,阻碍干预措施的整合,并导致次优的艾滋病治疗结果。本研究旨在了解组织是否准备好为感染 HIV 的黑人妇女实施捆绑干预措施,并了解实施的促进因素和障碍:我们在参与 "黑人妇女第一"(BWF)倡议的 12 个地点进行了混合方法准备度评估,以衡量实施捆绑干预措施的准备情况。我们使用组织实施变革准备度量表(ORIC)对准备情况进行了评估,并使用两个开放式问题对促进因素和障碍进行了调查。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月期间,使用线性模型对参与者和组织层面因素之间的关联进行了评估。在实施前对员工进行了虚拟访谈,并在 NVivo 中管理访谈记录。采用定向内容分析法探讨实施障碍和促进因素:研究机构在基线时表现出了较高的组织准备度;组织实施变革的总体准备度(ORIC)(平均值 56.4,中位数 59,四分位数间距 [IQR] 5)和 ORIC 变革效果分量表(平均值 32.4,中位数 35,IQR 4)、变革承诺(平均值 24,中位数 25,IQR 1),这与针对感染 HIV 的黑人妇女实施捆绑干预的意愿和能力是一致的。在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访期间,组织准备度仍然很高。在 6 个月的随访中,员工角色与组织准备度(p = 0.007)、变革效果(p = 0.006)和变革承诺(p = 0.020)明显相关。定性分析表明,战略规划和评估(例如,团队协调和工作流程的开发,以支持实施)、通过组织内部的网络编织实现的组织变革、吸引外部合作伙伴参与的沟通系统,以及用于招聘和培训的可用资源,都有助于做好准备。合作领导和组织认同、员工积极性以及合作伙伴关系促进了实施进程:参与 BWF 计划的组织具有较高的组织准备度,反映了为感染 HIV 的黑人妇女实施捆绑式干预措施的意愿和能力。未来的研究应考察准备程度与临床结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信