An integrated model of care between general surgery and general medicine rationalizes and enhances the care of older surgical patients.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Noha Ferrah, Sauro Salomoni, Richard Turner
{"title":"An integrated model of care between general surgery and general medicine rationalizes and enhances the care of older surgical patients.","authors":"Noha Ferrah, Sauro Salomoni, Richard Turner","doi":"10.1111/ans.19264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>There is growing evidence on the benefits of integrated models of care between surgeons and physicians in non-orthopaedic surgery. We implemented a new General Surgery/General Medicine care model, for all emergency General Surgery patients aged 75 years and older. We compared rates of goals of care (GOC) documentation, hospital-acquired complications (HAC), mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a non-randomized trial, with data collected prospectively in phase 1 (2021-2022), where patients received the traditional standard of care (case-by-case referral to a General Physician), and in phase 2 (2022-2023) where patients received integrated care. Variables were compared between phase 1 and phase 2 using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and forty-nine patients, 188 in phase 1 and 361 in phase 2, participated in the study. On univariate analysis, there was a significant increase in patients treated non-surgically in phase 2 (58.5% vs. 69.0%). Patients treated non-surgically had significantly shorter LOS, experienced less HACs (P < 0.001). Other variables did not significantly differ after implementation of the service. The multivariate GLM revealed a significant reduction in admissions with undocumented GOC in phase 2 (P = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that an integrated care model resulted in a greater proportion of patients being treated non-surgically with a comparable rate of HAC and mortality, as well as better documentation of patients' GOC. As the number of older surgical patients will continue to rise, the call for such service to become standard of care in non-orthopaedic surgery is pressing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: There is growing evidence on the benefits of integrated models of care between surgeons and physicians in non-orthopaedic surgery. We implemented a new General Surgery/General Medicine care model, for all emergency General Surgery patients aged 75 years and older. We compared rates of goals of care (GOC) documentation, hospital-acquired complications (HAC), mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS).

Methods: This is a non-randomized trial, with data collected prospectively in phase 1 (2021-2022), where patients received the traditional standard of care (case-by-case referral to a General Physician), and in phase 2 (2022-2023) where patients received integrated care. Variables were compared between phase 1 and phase 2 using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs).

Results: Five hundred and forty-nine patients, 188 in phase 1 and 361 in phase 2, participated in the study. On univariate analysis, there was a significant increase in patients treated non-surgically in phase 2 (58.5% vs. 69.0%). Patients treated non-surgically had significantly shorter LOS, experienced less HACs (P < 0.001). Other variables did not significantly differ after implementation of the service. The multivariate GLM revealed a significant reduction in admissions with undocumented GOC in phase 2 (P = 0.037).

Conclusion: This study showed that an integrated care model resulted in a greater proportion of patients being treated non-surgically with a comparable rate of HAC and mortality, as well as better documentation of patients' GOC. As the number of older surgical patients will continue to rise, the call for such service to become standard of care in non-orthopaedic surgery is pressing.

普通外科和普通内科之间的综合护理模式合理地加强了对老年外科病人的护理。
背景:越来越多的证据表明,外科医生和内科医生之间的综合护理模式对非矫形外科手术大有裨益。我们对所有 75 岁及以上的急诊普通外科患者实施了新的普通外科/普通内科护理模式。我们比较了护理目标(GOC)记录率、医院获得性并发症(HAC)、死亡率和住院时间(LOS):这是一项非随机试验,在第 1 阶段(2021-2022 年)和第 2 阶段(2022-2023 年)前瞻性地收集了数据,第 1 阶段的患者接受传统的标准护理(逐例转诊至全科医生),第 2 阶段的患者接受综合护理。使用广义线性模型(GLM)对第一阶段和第二阶段的变量进行比较:共有五百四十九名患者参与了研究,其中第一阶段有 188 人,第二阶段有 361 人。经单变量分析,在第二阶段接受非手术治疗的患者明显增加(58.5% 对 69.0%)。非手术治疗患者的住院时间明显更短,发生的 HACs 也更少(P 结论:非手术治疗患者的住院时间明显更短,发生的 HACs 也更少(P 结论):这项研究表明,综合护理模式使更多患者接受了非手术治疗,HAC 和死亡率相当,同时患者的 GOC 记录也得到了改善。由于老年手术患者的人数将继续增加,因此迫切需要将这种服务作为非矫形外科手术的标准护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信