Oxygen therapy and noninvasive respiratory supports in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a narrative review.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Arnaud W Thille, Frédéric Balen, Guillaume Carteaux, Tahar Chouihed, Jean-Pierre Frat, Christophe Girault, Erwan L'Her, Nicolas Marjanovic, Mai-Anh Nay, Patrick Ray, Matthieu Reffienna, Leo Retenauer, Antoine Roch, Guillaume Thiery, Jennifer Truchot
{"title":"Oxygen therapy and noninvasive respiratory supports in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a narrative review.","authors":"Arnaud W Thille, Frédéric Balen, Guillaume Carteaux, Tahar Chouihed, Jean-Pierre Frat, Christophe Girault, Erwan L'Her, Nicolas Marjanovic, Mai-Anh Nay, Patrick Ray, Matthieu Reffienna, Leo Retenauer, Antoine Roch, Guillaume Thiery, Jennifer Truchot","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01389-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This narrative review was written by an expert panel to the members of the jury to help in the development of clinical practice guidelines on oxygen therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the expert panel, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was defined as PaO<sub>2</sub> < 60 mm Hg or SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% on room air, or PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 300 mm Hg. Supplemental oxygen should be administered according to the monitoring of SpO<sub>2</sub>, with the aim at maintaining SpO<sub>2</sub> above 92% and below 98%. Noninvasive respiratory supports are generally reserved for the most hypoxemic patients with the aim of relieving dyspnea. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) seems superior to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) as a means of avoiding intubation and may therefore be should probably be used as a first-line noninvasive respiratory support in patients requiring more than 6 L/min of oxygen or PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 200 mm Hg and a respiratory rate above 25 breaths/minute or clinical signs of respiratory distress, but with no benefits on mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) cannot currently be recommended as a first-line noninvasive respiratory support, since its beneficial effects on intubation remain uncertain. Despite older studies favoring noninvasive ventilation (NIV) over COT, recent clinical trials fail to show beneficial effects with NIV compared to HFNC. Therefore, there is no evidence to support the use of NIV or CPAP as first-line treatment if HFNC is available. Clinical trials do not support the hypothesis that noninvasive respiratory supports may lead to late intubation. The potential benefits of awake prone positioning on the risk of intubation in patients with COVID-19 cannot be extrapolated to patients with another etiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whereas oxygen supplementation should be initiated for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure defined as PaO<sub>2</sub> below 60 mm Hg or SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% on room air, HFNC should be the first-line noninvasive respiratory support in patients with PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 200 mm Hg with increased respiratory rate. Further studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of CPAP, NIV through a helmet and awake prone position in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure not related to COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"158"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01389-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This narrative review was written by an expert panel to the members of the jury to help in the development of clinical practice guidelines on oxygen therapy.

Results: According to the expert panel, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure was defined as PaO2 < 60 mm Hg or SpO2 < 90% on room air, or PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg. Supplemental oxygen should be administered according to the monitoring of SpO2, with the aim at maintaining SpO2 above 92% and below 98%. Noninvasive respiratory supports are generally reserved for the most hypoxemic patients with the aim of relieving dyspnea. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) seems superior to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) as a means of avoiding intubation and may therefore be should probably be used as a first-line noninvasive respiratory support in patients requiring more than 6 L/min of oxygen or PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg and a respiratory rate above 25 breaths/minute or clinical signs of respiratory distress, but with no benefits on mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) cannot currently be recommended as a first-line noninvasive respiratory support, since its beneficial effects on intubation remain uncertain. Despite older studies favoring noninvasive ventilation (NIV) over COT, recent clinical trials fail to show beneficial effects with NIV compared to HFNC. Therefore, there is no evidence to support the use of NIV or CPAP as first-line treatment if HFNC is available. Clinical trials do not support the hypothesis that noninvasive respiratory supports may lead to late intubation. The potential benefits of awake prone positioning on the risk of intubation in patients with COVID-19 cannot be extrapolated to patients with another etiology.

Conclusions: Whereas oxygen supplementation should be initiated for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure defined as PaO2 below 60 mm Hg or SpO2 < 90% on room air, HFNC should be the first-line noninvasive respiratory support in patients with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg with increased respiratory rate. Further studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of CPAP, NIV through a helmet and awake prone position in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure not related to COVID-19.

急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭的氧气治疗和无创呼吸支持:综述。
背景:这篇叙述性综述由专家小组撰写,提交给评委会成员,以帮助制定氧疗临床实践指南:专家小组认为,PaO2 2 2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg 即为急性低氧血症性呼吸衰竭。应根据 SpO2 监测结果补充氧气,目标是将 SpO2 维持在 92% 以上、98% 以下。无创呼吸支持一般用于低氧血症最严重的患者,目的是缓解呼吸困难。高流量鼻插管供氧(HFNC)作为一种避免插管的方法似乎优于传统氧疗(COT),因此,在需要 6 升/分钟以上氧气或 PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg 且呼吸频率超过 25 次/分钟或有呼吸窘迫临床表现的患者中,HFNC 可能应作为一线无创呼吸支持,但对死亡率无益。持续气道正压(CPAP)目前还不能被推荐为一线无创呼吸支持,因为其对插管的益处仍不确定。尽管较早的研究倾向于无创通气(NIV)而非 COT,但最近的临床试验未能显示 NIV 比 HFNC 更有益。因此,没有证据支持在可以使用 HFNC 的情况下将 NIV 或 CPAP 用作一线治疗。临床试验并不支持无创呼吸支持可能导致后期插管的假设。清醒俯卧位对 COVID-19 患者插管风险的潜在益处不能推广到其他病因的患者:结论:对于 PaO2 低于 60 mm Hg 或 SpO2 2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg 并伴有呼吸频率增加的急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭患者,应开始补充氧气。对于与 COVID-19 无关的急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭患者,需要进一步研究来评估 CPAP、通过头盔进行 NIV 和清醒俯卧位的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信