Racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes: A systematic review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Polina Zmijewski, Chibueze Nwaiwu, Hayato Nakanishi, Soroush Farsi, Jessica Fazendin, Brenessa Lindeman, Herbert Chen, Andrea Gillis
{"title":"Racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes: A systematic review.","authors":"Polina Zmijewski, Chibueze Nwaiwu, Hayato Nakanishi, Soroush Farsi, Jessica Fazendin, Brenessa Lindeman, Herbert Chen, Andrea Gillis","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racial disparities in surgical outcomes are well described, but a paucity of literature exists examining trends in outcomes of thyroid cancer. We performed a systematic review of studies on thyroid cancer outcomes to better delineate the impact of race.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy was performed in several academic databases for articles on thyroid cancer and surgical outcomes in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 1771 abstracts were reviewed. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Studies that were based in the United States, included single center, unique data, focused on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer, were performed on adults >18 years old, and reported race in their results were included. Chi square statistics with Yates correction were calculated on the compiled data. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022300021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met inclusion criteria with data on 7,221patients. Among the included studies, our study consists of 67 ​% White patients, 22 ​% Black patients, 7 ​% Hispanic patients, and 3 ​% Asian patients. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 8.4 ​% (n ​= ​13) of White patients. In comparison to White patients, Black (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​21, p ​= ​0.024) and Hispanic patients (28.3 ​%, n ​= ​30, p ​< ​0.001) had a higher incidence of extrathyroidal extension, while a similar incidence was observed in Asian patients (14.0 ​%, n ​= ​8, p ​= ​0.336). Compared to White patients (22.2 ​%, n ​= ​34), Black (12.4 ​%, n ​= ​13, p ​= ​0.065), Hispanic (16.0 ​%, n ​= ​15, p ​= ​0.301), and Asian (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​9, p ​= ​0.709) patients had a similar incidence of T1a stage. White patients had 10.1 ​% (n ​= ​54) recurrence rates, and Black (13.5 ​%, n ​= ​7, p ​= ​0.595), Hispanic (10.5 ​%, n ​= ​2, p ​= ​1.000), and Asian (11.1 ​%, n ​= ​3, p ​= ​1.000) patients had similar recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Race is seldom reported in outcomes on studies of thyroid cancer. From our analysis we conclude that non-White patients may have a higher risk of more advanced local disease at presentation. More data with granular detail on race is necessary to better understand racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes and how to alleviate them.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Racial disparities in surgical outcomes are well described, but a paucity of literature exists examining trends in outcomes of thyroid cancer. We performed a systematic review of studies on thyroid cancer outcomes to better delineate the impact of race.

Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was performed in several academic databases for articles on thyroid cancer and surgical outcomes in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 1771 abstracts were reviewed. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Studies that were based in the United States, included single center, unique data, focused on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer, were performed on adults >18 years old, and reported race in their results were included. Chi square statistics with Yates correction were calculated on the compiled data. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022300021).

Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria with data on 7,221patients. Among the included studies, our study consists of 67 ​% White patients, 22 ​% Black patients, 7 ​% Hispanic patients, and 3 ​% Asian patients. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 8.4 ​% (n ​= ​13) of White patients. In comparison to White patients, Black (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​21, p ​= ​0.024) and Hispanic patients (28.3 ​%, n ​= ​30, p ​< ​0.001) had a higher incidence of extrathyroidal extension, while a similar incidence was observed in Asian patients (14.0 ​%, n ​= ​8, p ​= ​0.336). Compared to White patients (22.2 ​%, n ​= ​34), Black (12.4 ​%, n ​= ​13, p ​= ​0.065), Hispanic (16.0 ​%, n ​= ​15, p ​= ​0.301), and Asian (18.4 ​%, n ​= ​9, p ​= ​0.709) patients had a similar incidence of T1a stage. White patients had 10.1 ​% (n ​= ​54) recurrence rates, and Black (13.5 ​%, n ​= ​7, p ​= ​0.595), Hispanic (10.5 ​%, n ​= ​2, p ​= ​1.000), and Asian (11.1 ​%, n ​= ​3, p ​= ​1.000) patients had similar recurrence rates.

Conclusions: Race is seldom reported in outcomes on studies of thyroid cancer. From our analysis we conclude that non-White patients may have a higher risk of more advanced local disease at presentation. More data with granular detail on race is necessary to better understand racial disparities in thyroid cancer outcomes and how to alleviate them.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信