A Pilot Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Patients with a Low 1-Hour Glucose Challenge Test Result versus Controls to Detect Maternal Hypoglycemia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jia Jennifer Ding, Lauren Milley, Moeun Son
{"title":"A Pilot Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Patients with a Low 1-Hour Glucose Challenge Test Result versus Controls to Detect Maternal Hypoglycemia.","authors":"Jia Jennifer Ding, Lauren Milley, Moeun Son","doi":"10.1055/a-2419-8476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> A low 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) result (<10th percentile for population) has been associated with neonatal morbidity, including small-for-gestational-age birth weight, and it is hypothesized that underlying maternal hypoglycemia may contribute to this neonatal morbidity. We sought to assess whether eligible patients would undergo continuous glucose monitoring to allow comparison of maternal hypoglycemia between those with a low GCT result versus controls.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> This exploratory study enrolled patients who completed a GCT between 24 and 30 weeks' gestation from June to September 2022. English- or Spanish-speaking participants aged ≥18 years wore a blinded continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for 10 days. There were 10 participants each in the low GCT (<82 mg/dL) and normal GCT group. Proportions were calculated to determine recruitment rates and describe the low versus normal glycemic groups across clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Maternal hypoglycemia, defined using various proposed thresholds, was analyzed as continuous data (time duration) with Student's <i>t</i>-tests and categorical data (number of episodes) with chi-square tests and bivariate analyses were performed comparing participants with a low versus normal GCT. Primary outcome measures were recruitment, enrollment, and adherence rates, and overall glycemic values for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 64 eligible patients, 58 (91%) were approached, and of them, 20 (35%) were enrolled. All 20 participants had CGM data to review with 100% adherence. Average glucose values were similar between participants in the low GCT and normal GCT groups (111.7 ± 18.0 vs. 111.6 ± 11.7 mg/dL, <i>p</i> = 0.99), and participants with a low GCT value did not demonstrate more hypoglycemia than those with a normal GCT value across five proposed thresholds on CGM analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In this pilot study, participants wore blinded CGMs to collect glycemic data, and those with a low GCT result did not experience more hypoglycemia than those with a normal GCT on CGM analysis.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Study participants wore continuous glucose monitors in blinded mode to gather glycemic data with 100% adherence.. · Participants with a low GCT result (<82 mg/dL) as compared with those with a normal GCT result were not more likely to demonstrate maternal hypoglycemia using several thresholds on CGM analysis.. · In our cohort, there were few participants in either glycemic group who reported food insecurity or lived in a food desert..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2419-8476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  A low 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) result (<10th percentile for population) has been associated with neonatal morbidity, including small-for-gestational-age birth weight, and it is hypothesized that underlying maternal hypoglycemia may contribute to this neonatal morbidity. We sought to assess whether eligible patients would undergo continuous glucose monitoring to allow comparison of maternal hypoglycemia between those with a low GCT result versus controls.

Study design:  This exploratory study enrolled patients who completed a GCT between 24 and 30 weeks' gestation from June to September 2022. English- or Spanish-speaking participants aged ≥18 years wore a blinded continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for 10 days. There were 10 participants each in the low GCT (<82 mg/dL) and normal GCT group. Proportions were calculated to determine recruitment rates and describe the low versus normal glycemic groups across clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Maternal hypoglycemia, defined using various proposed thresholds, was analyzed as continuous data (time duration) with Student's t-tests and categorical data (number of episodes) with chi-square tests and bivariate analyses were performed comparing participants with a low versus normal GCT. Primary outcome measures were recruitment, enrollment, and adherence rates, and overall glycemic values for each group.

Results:  Of 64 eligible patients, 58 (91%) were approached, and of them, 20 (35%) were enrolled. All 20 participants had CGM data to review with 100% adherence. Average glucose values were similar between participants in the low GCT and normal GCT groups (111.7 ± 18.0 vs. 111.6 ± 11.7 mg/dL, p = 0.99), and participants with a low GCT value did not demonstrate more hypoglycemia than those with a normal GCT value across five proposed thresholds on CGM analysis.

Conclusion:  In this pilot study, participants wore blinded CGMs to collect glycemic data, and those with a low GCT result did not experience more hypoglycemia than those with a normal GCT on CGM analysis.

Key points: · Study participants wore continuous glucose monitors in blinded mode to gather glycemic data with 100% adherence.. · Participants with a low GCT result (<82 mg/dL) as compared with those with a normal GCT result were not more likely to demonstrate maternal hypoglycemia using several thresholds on CGM analysis.. · In our cohort, there were few participants in either glycemic group who reported food insecurity or lived in a food desert..

在 1 小时葡萄糖挑战测试结果偏低的患者和对照组中使用连续葡萄糖监测仪检测孕产妇低血糖的试点研究。
研究目的1 小时葡萄糖挑战试验(GCT)结果偏低(研究设计:这项探索性研究招募了 2022 年 6 月至 9 月期间在妊娠 24 周至 30 周之间完成 GCT 的患者。年龄≥18 岁的英语或西班牙语参与者佩戴盲法连续血糖监测仪(CGM)10 天。低 GCT 组各有 10 名参与者(对低 GCT 和正常 GCT 的参与者进行了 t 检验和分类数据(发作次数)的卡方检验和双变量分析。主要结果指标为各组的招募率、注册率、坚持率和总体血糖值:在 64 名符合条件的患者中,58 人(91%)接受了治疗,其中 20 人(35%)入组。所有 20 名参与者都有 CGM 数据可供查看,100% 的参与者都坚持使用 CGM。低 GCT 组和正常 GCT 组参与者的平均血糖值相似(111.7 ± 18.0 vs. 111.6 ± 11.7 mg/dL,p = 0.99),在 CGM 分析的五个建议阈值中,低 GCT 值参与者的低血糖症状并不比正常 GCT 值参与者严重:在这项试点研究中,参与者佩戴盲法连续血糖监测仪收集血糖数据,在连续血糖监测仪分析中,GCT 值低的参与者并没有比 GCT 值正常的参与者出现更多的低血糖:- 研究参与者在盲法模式下佩戴连续血糖监测仪收集血糖数据,依从性达到 100%。- GCT 结果较低的参与者 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信