Application of ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum block approach at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2024-09-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/BOZK1723
Songhua Liu, Liyan Cao, Yao Zhang, Ling Li, Jie Li, Lu Li, Songbo Fu
{"title":"Application of ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum block approach at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.","authors":"Songhua Liu, Liyan Cao, Yao Zhang, Ling Li, Jie Li, Lu Li, Songbo Fu","doi":"10.62347/BOZK1723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the anesthetic and analgesic effects of combining general anesthesia with an anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (SA-AQLB) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 92 elderly patients scheduled for radical CRC resection were randomly divided into three groups: ultrasound-guided SA-AQLB group (SA group, n=31), ultrasound-guided subcostal AQLB (SC-AQLB) group (SC group, n=31), and a general anesthesia-only group (GA group, n=30). Measurements included mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at predefined time points, ranging from pre-operation to the end of surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded at multiple postoperative time points up to 48 hours. Additional data collected included intraoperative drug dosages, anesthetic recovery times, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) usage, Lovett muscle strength scores, and early postoperative recovery indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SA group consistently showed lower MAP and HR compared to the SC group, which in turn was lower than the GA group during the monitored time points (all P<0.05). Sensory block levels were significantly higher in the SA group than that in the SC group (P<0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were also significantly lower in the SA group compared to the other groups at all recorded times (all P<0.05). The SA group required lower doses of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil, but higher doses of ephedrine compared to the SC and GA groups (all P<0.05). Anesthesia recovery time was shorter in the SA group, and the total number of PCIA pump presses was least in the SA group (P<0.05). Early ambulation was achieved sooner in the SA and SC groups (P<0.05), and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced in these groups compared to the GA group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided SA-AQLB provides superior outcomes to general anesthesia alone in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic CRC surgery. This approach significantly reduces general anesthesia drug dosage, decreases postoperative pain, minimizes perioperative adverse events, and accelerates patient recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"14 9","pages":"4248-4264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/BOZK1723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the anesthetic and analgesic effects of combining general anesthesia with an anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (SA-AQLB) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods: In this prospective study, 92 elderly patients scheduled for radical CRC resection were randomly divided into three groups: ultrasound-guided SA-AQLB group (SA group, n=31), ultrasound-guided subcostal AQLB (SC-AQLB) group (SC group, n=31), and a general anesthesia-only group (GA group, n=30). Measurements included mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at predefined time points, ranging from pre-operation to the end of surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded at multiple postoperative time points up to 48 hours. Additional data collected included intraoperative drug dosages, anesthetic recovery times, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) usage, Lovett muscle strength scores, and early postoperative recovery indicators.

Results: The SA group consistently showed lower MAP and HR compared to the SC group, which in turn was lower than the GA group during the monitored time points (all P<0.05). Sensory block levels were significantly higher in the SA group than that in the SC group (P<0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were also significantly lower in the SA group compared to the other groups at all recorded times (all P<0.05). The SA group required lower doses of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil, but higher doses of ephedrine compared to the SC and GA groups (all P<0.05). Anesthesia recovery time was shorter in the SA group, and the total number of PCIA pump presses was least in the SA group (P<0.05). Early ambulation was achieved sooner in the SA and SC groups (P<0.05), and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced in these groups compared to the GA group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: General anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided SA-AQLB provides superior outcomes to general anesthesia alone in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic CRC surgery. This approach significantly reduces general anesthesia drug dosage, decreases postoperative pain, minimizes perioperative adverse events, and accelerates patient recovery.

超声引导下腰前区外侧上韧带阻滞法在老年结直肠癌手术患者中的应用。
目的研究对接受腹腔镜结直肠癌(CRC)根治性切除术的老年患者进行全身麻醉与外侧臀上韧带前腰肌阻滞(SA-AQLB)相结合的麻醉和镇痛效果:在这项前瞻性研究中,92名计划接受CRC根治性切除术的老年患者被随机分为三组:超声引导下SA-AQLB组(SA组,31人)、超声引导下肋下AQLB(SC-AQLB)组(SC组,31人)和单纯全身麻醉组(GA组,30人)。测量包括从手术前到手术结束的预定时间点的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)。在术后多个时间点记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分,直至 48 小时。收集的其他数据包括术中药物剂量、麻醉恢复时间、患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)使用情况、洛维特肌力评分和术后早期恢复指标:结果:与 SC 组相比,SA 组的 MAP 和 HR 一直较低,而 SC 组在监测时间点上的 MAP 和 HR 又低于 GA 组(所有 PC):对于接受腹腔镜 CRC 手术的老年患者,全身麻醉结合超声引导 SA-AQLB 的效果优于单纯全身麻醉。这种方法大大减少了全身麻醉药物用量,减轻了术后疼痛,将围术期不良反应降至最低,并加快了患者的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信