Acute amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity in adult ICU patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation-A systematic review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1111/aas.14535
Theodor Ling-Vannerus, Conni Skrubbeltrang, Olav L Schjørring, Morten H Møller, Bodil S Rasmussen
{"title":"Acute amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity in adult ICU patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation-A systematic review.","authors":"Theodor Ling-Vannerus, Conni Skrubbeltrang, Olav L Schjørring, Morten H Møller, Bodil S Rasmussen","doi":"10.1111/aas.14535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter (NOAF) is a common arrhythmia in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Intravenous amiodarone is one of the most used anti-arrhythmic drugs, despite its risk of inducing acute amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity (APT). We aimed to outline the body of evidence on acute APT in ICU patients with NOAF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search using the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) approach. We included studies of adults admitted to the ICU, who developed NOAF during their ICU stay, were treated with amiodarone, and reported on acute APT, irrespective of research design. The CASE guidelines were applied to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and study results are reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No randomised controlled trials or observational studies were identified. Nine case reports and one retrospective case series of fatal outcomes in ICU patients treated with amiodarone for NOAF constituted the evidence base. The quality of the included studies was high with a mean of 10 (range 8-12) of the 13 CASE guideline criteria fulfilled. The studies included a total of 16 critically ill adults who was diagnosed with acute APT after a mean of 9 days (range 2-20 days) following initiation of amiodarone with a mean total dose of amiodarone of 4553 mg (range 1100-13,500 mg) predominantly administrated intravenously. Three out of nine patients in the case reports died in the ICU during the amiodarone treatment. No long-term follow-up was conducted for the survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute APT in adult ICU patients treated with amiodarone for NOAF is poorly described and is based on a total of 16 reported cases. Additional studies assessing the safety of amiodarone in critically ill adults with NOAF in the ICU is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"e14535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter (NOAF) is a common arrhythmia in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Intravenous amiodarone is one of the most used anti-arrhythmic drugs, despite its risk of inducing acute amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity (APT). We aimed to outline the body of evidence on acute APT in ICU patients with NOAF.

Methods: We performed a systematic search using the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) approach. We included studies of adults admitted to the ICU, who developed NOAF during their ICU stay, were treated with amiodarone, and reported on acute APT, irrespective of research design. The CASE guidelines were applied to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and study results are reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Results: No randomised controlled trials or observational studies were identified. Nine case reports and one retrospective case series of fatal outcomes in ICU patients treated with amiodarone for NOAF constituted the evidence base. The quality of the included studies was high with a mean of 10 (range 8-12) of the 13 CASE guideline criteria fulfilled. The studies included a total of 16 critically ill adults who was diagnosed with acute APT after a mean of 9 days (range 2-20 days) following initiation of amiodarone with a mean total dose of amiodarone of 4553 mg (range 1100-13,500 mg) predominantly administrated intravenously. Three out of nine patients in the case reports died in the ICU during the amiodarone treatment. No long-term follow-up was conducted for the survivors.

Conclusion: Acute APT in adult ICU patients treated with amiodarone for NOAF is poorly described and is based on a total of 16 reported cases. Additional studies assessing the safety of amiodarone in critically ill adults with NOAF in the ICU is warranted.

新发心房颤动成人重症监护病房患者急性胺碘酮诱发的肺毒性--系统综述。
背景:新发心房颤动或扑动(NOAF)是成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者常见的心律失常。静脉注射胺碘酮是最常用的抗心律失常药物之一,尽管它有诱发急性胺碘酮肺毒性(APT)的风险。我们旨在概述 ICU NOAF 患者急性 APT 的相关证据:我们采用人群、干预、比较和结果(PICO)方法进行了系统检索。我们纳入了针对入住重症监护室、在重症监护室住院期间出现 NOAF、接受胺碘酮治疗并报告急性 APT 的成人的研究,无论研究设计如何。研究结果按照系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行报告:未发现随机对照试验或观察性研究。九份病例报告和一份回顾性系列病例报告涉及使用胺碘酮治疗 NOAF 的 ICU 患者的死亡结果,这些报告构成了证据基础。所纳入研究的质量较高,在 13 项 CASE 指南标准中,平均有 10 项(8-12 项)符合标准。这些研究共纳入了 16 名重症成人患者,他们在开始使用胺碘酮后平均 9 天(2-20 天)被诊断为急性 APT,胺碘酮的平均总剂量为 4553 毫克(1100-13500 毫克),主要通过静脉注射。病例报告中的九名患者中有三名在胺碘酮治疗期间死于重症监护室。未对幸存者进行长期随访:结论:对使用胺碘酮治疗 NOAF 的成人 ICU 患者急性 APT 的描述较少,且仅基于 16 例报告病例。有必要开展更多研究,评估胺碘酮对重症监护病房中患有 NOAF 的重症成人患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信