Genotyping Error Detection and Customised Filtration for SNP Datasets

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Noa Yaffa Kan-Lingwood, Liran Sagi, Shahar Mazie, Naama Shahar, Lilith Zecherle Bitton, Alan Templeton, Daniel Rubenstein, Amos Bouskila, Shirli Bar-David
{"title":"Genotyping Error Detection and Customised Filtration for SNP Datasets","authors":"Noa Yaffa Kan-Lingwood,&nbsp;Liran Sagi,&nbsp;Shahar Mazie,&nbsp;Naama Shahar,&nbsp;Lilith Zecherle Bitton,&nbsp;Alan Templeton,&nbsp;Daniel Rubenstein,&nbsp;Amos Bouskila,&nbsp;Shirli Bar-David","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.14033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A major challenge in analysing single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype datasets is detecting and filtering errors that bias analyses and misinterpret ecological and evolutionary processes. Here, we present a comprehensive method to estimate and minimise genotyping error rates (deviations from the ‘true’ genotype) in any SNP datasets using triplicates (three repeats of the same sample) in a four-step filtration pipeline. The approach involves: (1) SNP filtering by missing data; (2) SNP filtering by error rates; (3) sample filtering by missing data and (4) detection of recaptured individuals by using estimated SNP error rates. The modular pipeline is provided in an R script that allows customised adjustments. We demonstrate the applicability of the method using non-invasive sampling from the Asiatic wild ass (<i>Equus hemionus</i>) population in Israel. We genotyped 756 samples using 625 SNPs, of which 255 were triplicates of 85 samples. The average SNP error rate, calculated based on the number of mismatching genotypes across triplicates before filtration, was 0.0034 and was reduced to 0.00174 following filtration. Evaluating genetic distance (GD) and relatedness (<i>r</i>) between triplicates before and after filtration (expected to be at the minimum and maximum respectively) showed a significant reduction in the average GD, from 58.1 to 25.3 (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) and a significant increase in relatedness, from <i>r</i> = 0.98 to <i>r =</i> 0.991 (<i>p</i> = 0.00587). We demonstrate how error rate estimation enhances recapture detection and improves genotype quality.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1755-0998.14033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A major challenge in analysing single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype datasets is detecting and filtering errors that bias analyses and misinterpret ecological and evolutionary processes. Here, we present a comprehensive method to estimate and minimise genotyping error rates (deviations from the ‘true’ genotype) in any SNP datasets using triplicates (three repeats of the same sample) in a four-step filtration pipeline. The approach involves: (1) SNP filtering by missing data; (2) SNP filtering by error rates; (3) sample filtering by missing data and (4) detection of recaptured individuals by using estimated SNP error rates. The modular pipeline is provided in an R script that allows customised adjustments. We demonstrate the applicability of the method using non-invasive sampling from the Asiatic wild ass (Equus hemionus) population in Israel. We genotyped 756 samples using 625 SNPs, of which 255 were triplicates of 85 samples. The average SNP error rate, calculated based on the number of mismatching genotypes across triplicates before filtration, was 0.0034 and was reduced to 0.00174 following filtration. Evaluating genetic distance (GD) and relatedness (r) between triplicates before and after filtration (expected to be at the minimum and maximum respectively) showed a significant reduction in the average GD, from 58.1 to 25.3 (p = 0.0002) and a significant increase in relatedness, from r = 0.98 to r = 0.991 (p = 0.00587). We demonstrate how error rate estimation enhances recapture detection and improves genotype quality.

基因分型错误检测和 SNP 数据集定制过滤。
分析单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因型数据集的一个主要挑战是检测和过滤错误,这些错误会使分析产生偏差并误解生态和进化过程。在这里,我们提出了一种综合方法,利用三重样本(同一样本的三次重复)在四步过滤管道中估算并最小化任何 SNP 数据集中的基因分型错误率(与 "真实 "基因型的偏差)。该方法包括:(1) 根据缺失数据过滤 SNP;(2) 根据错误率过滤 SNP;(3) 根据缺失数据过滤样本;(4) 根据估计的 SNP 错误率检测重新捕获的个体。该模块化管道以 R 脚本的形式提供,可进行定制调整。我们利用对以色列亚洲野驴(Equus hemionus)种群的非侵入性采样证明了该方法的适用性。我们使用 625 个 SNP 对 756 个样本进行了基因分型,其中 255 个样本是 85 个样本的三倍体。根据过滤前三重样本中不匹配基因型的数量计算,SNP 平均错误率为 0.0034,过滤后降至 0.00174。评估过滤前后(预计分别为最小值和最大值)三重样之间的遗传距离(GD)和亲缘关系(r)显示,平均 GD 显著降低,从 58.1 降至 25.3(p = 0.0002),亲缘关系显著增加,从 r = 0.98 升至 r = 0.991(p = 0.00587)。我们展示了误差率估计是如何增强再捕获检测并提高基因型质量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信