Sustainable solution selection for solid waste incineration fly ash: a multicriteria framework based on objective weights and fusion ranks

IF 2.7 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s10163-024-02082-7

Di Xu

{"title":"Sustainable solution selection for solid waste incineration fly ash: a multicriteria framework based on objective weights and fusion ranks","authors":"Di Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02082-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fly ash (FA), a byproduct of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI), poses significant hazards to urban development, necessitating its sustainable treatment. This study proposes a systematic decision support tool to identify the most sustainable MSWI FA treatment technology among various options, considering diverse criteria. The research introduces a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework integrating the Grey Relational Coefficient (GRC) into the Analytical Network Process (ANP) for objective criterion weighting. Additionally, a Projection-based Programming (PbP) approach enhances the reliability of ranking MSWI FA treatment alternatives by reconciling disparate sequences from different MCDM techniques. This work pioneers the early application of MCDM methods in prioritizing sustainable MSWI FA treatment, offering two crucial mathematical contributions. Firstly, the GRC-ANP method objectively assigns weights by capturing statistical relationships among criteria. Secondly, the PbP approach consolidates varied MCDM outcomes to provide a reliable ranking. Testing five technologies against eight sustainability criteria validates the robustness and effectiveness of the framework, affirming its potential in aiding decision-making for sustainable MSWI FA treatment solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"26 6","pages":"3811 - 3823"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02082-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fly ash (FA), a byproduct of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI), poses significant hazards to urban development, necessitating its sustainable treatment. This study proposes a systematic decision support tool to identify the most sustainable MSWI FA treatment technology among various options, considering diverse criteria. The research introduces a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework integrating the Grey Relational Coefficient (GRC) into the Analytical Network Process (ANP) for objective criterion weighting. Additionally, a Projection-based Programming (PbP) approach enhances the reliability of ranking MSWI FA treatment alternatives by reconciling disparate sequences from different MCDM techniques. This work pioneers the early application of MCDM methods in prioritizing sustainable MSWI FA treatment, offering two crucial mathematical contributions. Firstly, the GRC-ANP method objectively assigns weights by capturing statistical relationships among criteria. Secondly, the PbP approach consolidates varied MCDM outcomes to provide a reliable ranking. Testing five technologies against eight sustainability criteria validates the robustness and effectiveness of the framework, affirming its potential in aiding decision-making for sustainable MSWI FA treatment solutions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

固体废物焚烧飞灰的可持续解决方案选择：基于目标权重和融合等级的多标准框架

粉煤灰（FA）是城市固体废物焚化（MSWI）的副产品，对城市发展造成重大危害，因此必须对其进行可持续处理。本研究提出了一种系统化的决策支持工具，用于在各种方案中确定最具可持续性的城市固体废物焚烧飞灰处理技术，同时考虑到不同的标准。研究引入了混合多标准决策（MCDM）框架，将灰色关系系数（GRC）整合到分析网络过程（ANP）中，用于客观标准加权。此外，基于投影的编程（PbP）方法通过协调不同 MCDM 技术的不同序列，提高了 MSWI FA 处理备选方案排序的可靠性。这项研究开创了将多重因素考虑方法应用于 MSWI FA 可持续处理优先级排序的先河，做出了两项重要的数学贡献。首先，GRC-ANP 方法通过捕捉标准之间的统计关系客观地分配权重。其次，PbP 方法综合了不同的 MCDM 结果，提供了可靠的排序。根据八项可持续性标准对五项技术进行测试，验证了该框架的稳健性和有效性，肯定了其在帮助决策可持续 MSWI FA 处理解决方案方面的潜力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 环境科学-环境科学

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

16.10%

发文量

205

审稿时长

4.8 months

期刊介绍： The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).