Using the Ideal/Nonideal Distinction in Philosophy of Language (and Elsewhere)

IF 1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1080/00048402.2024.2403762

Jeff Engelhardt, Molly Moran

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever (C&D) have recently argued that the ideal/non-ideal distinction is ‘useless’ in philosophy of language. This paper responds to C&D’s argument, develops an account of ...

查看原文本刊更多论文

在语言哲学（及其他领域）中使用理想/非理想的区别

赫尔曼-卡佩伦（Herman Cappelen）和乔什-迪弗（Josh Dever，C&D）最近认为，理想与非理想的区分在语言哲学中 "毫无用处"。本文对 C&D 的论点做出了回应，阐述了理想与非理想的区别在语言哲学中的 "无用性"。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Australasian Journal of Philosophy (AJP) is one of the world''s leading philosophy journals. Founded in 1923, it has been continuously published ever since. It is recognized as one of the best in the analytic tradition, but is not narrow in what it regards as worthy of acceptance. Heavily cited in the general philosophical literature, it is covered by all the major abstracting and indexing services, including the Arts and Humanities Citation Index® which provides access to current and retrospective bibliographic information and cited references found in the world''s leading arts and humanities journals. In addition to Articles and Discussion Notes, the journal publishes Book Reviews and Book Notes as well as occasional commissioned Critical Notices. The journal is read world-wide and has recently published contributions from North and South American, European and Asian as well as Australasian authors.