Optimising management strategies for intrathecal catheters after accidental dural puncture

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1111/anae.16457
Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Michael Heesen, Yair Binyamin
{"title":"Optimising management strategies for intrathecal catheters after accidental dural puncture","authors":"Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Michael Heesen, Yair Binyamin","doi":"10.1111/anae.16457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We commend Griffiths et al. [<span>1</span>] for their work on managing intrathecal catheters after inadvertent dural puncture in obstetric patients. These evidence-based recommendations complement and enhance previous guidelines published in <i>Anaesthesia</i> [<span>2</span>]. The recommendation for early removal of intrathecal catheters is particularly noteworthy, as it corresponds with recent findings in the field. We previously recommended leaving the intrathecal catheter for 24 h, but subsequent research has indeed shown no benefit in prolonged catheterisation. In a recent study of 550 cases of accidental dural puncture, we found no advantage in leaving the intrathecal catheter in for 24 h postpartum (postdural puncture headache, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95%CI) 1.01 (1.00–1.02), p = 0.015; epidural blood patch, aOR (95%CI) 1.00 (0.99–1.01), p = 0.40) [<span>3</span>]. This aligns well with the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association current recommendation and supports the trend towards earlier catheter removal. Injecting intrathecal saline through the catheter was associated with decreased odds of developing postdural puncture headache (aOR (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73–0.99), p = 0.04) and reduced need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.75 (0.64–0.87), p &lt; 0.001) [<span>3</span>]. Moreover, there is some evidence suggesting that a combined approach, such as prophylactic cosyntropin administration with intrathecal 0.9% saline injection, may offer additional benefits in managing postdural puncture headache [<span>4</span>]. This area warrants further investigation and consideration in future updates.</p>\n<p>We agree with the authors on the importance of long-term follow-up. However, we suggest extending the follow-up period and explicitly including screening for chronic pain and postpartum depression. Recent studies have shown that women who experience accidental dural puncture are at increased risk of both these complications [<span>5</span>].</p>\n<p>We hope that ongoing research in intrathecal 0.9% saline injection, prophylactic treatments and the importance of extended follow-up with screening for chronic pain and postpartum depression can further optimise care for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"29 Suppl 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16457","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We commend Griffiths et al. [1] for their work on managing intrathecal catheters after inadvertent dural puncture in obstetric patients. These evidence-based recommendations complement and enhance previous guidelines published in Anaesthesia [2]. The recommendation for early removal of intrathecal catheters is particularly noteworthy, as it corresponds with recent findings in the field. We previously recommended leaving the intrathecal catheter for 24 h, but subsequent research has indeed shown no benefit in prolonged catheterisation. In a recent study of 550 cases of accidental dural puncture, we found no advantage in leaving the intrathecal catheter in for 24 h postpartum (postdural puncture headache, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95%CI) 1.01 (1.00–1.02), p = 0.015; epidural blood patch, aOR (95%CI) 1.00 (0.99–1.01), p = 0.40) [3]. This aligns well with the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association current recommendation and supports the trend towards earlier catheter removal. Injecting intrathecal saline through the catheter was associated with decreased odds of developing postdural puncture headache (aOR (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73–0.99), p = 0.04) and reduced need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.75 (0.64–0.87), p < 0.001) [3]. Moreover, there is some evidence suggesting that a combined approach, such as prophylactic cosyntropin administration with intrathecal 0.9% saline injection, may offer additional benefits in managing postdural puncture headache [4]. This area warrants further investigation and consideration in future updates.

We agree with the authors on the importance of long-term follow-up. However, we suggest extending the follow-up period and explicitly including screening for chronic pain and postpartum depression. Recent studies have shown that women who experience accidental dural puncture are at increased risk of both these complications [5].

We hope that ongoing research in intrathecal 0.9% saline injection, prophylactic treatments and the importance of extended follow-up with screening for chronic pain and postpartum depression can further optimise care for these patients.

意外硬膜穿刺后鞘内导管的优化管理策略
我们对 Griffiths 等人[1] 在产科患者不慎硬膜穿刺后管理鞘内导管方面所做的工作表示赞赏。这些以证据为基础的建议补充并完善了之前发表在《麻醉》杂志上的指南[2]。关于尽早拔除鞘内导管的建议尤其值得注意,因为它与该领域的最新研究结果相吻合。我们以前曾建议将鞘内导管留置 24 小时,但随后的研究确实表明延长导管留置时间并无益处。在最近对 550 例意外硬膜穿刺病例的研究中,我们发现在产后 24 小时内留置鞘内导管没有任何益处(硬膜穿刺后头痛,调整赔率 (aOR) (95%CI) 1.01 (1.00-1.02),p = 0.015;硬膜外血补丁,aOR (95%CI) 1.00 (0.99-1.01),p = 0.40)[3]。这与产科麻醉师协会目前的建议完全一致,并支持提前拔除导管的趋势。通过导管注射鞘内盐水与硬膜穿刺后头痛发生几率降低(aOR (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73-0.99),p = 0.04)和硬膜外血补片需求减少(aOR (95%CI) 0.75 (0.64-0.87),p < 0.001)有关[3]。此外,有证据表明,联合用药(如预防性注射复方阿糖胞苷和鞘内注射 0.9% 生理盐水)可在控制硬膜穿刺后头痛方面带来更多益处[4]。我们同意作者关于长期随访重要性的观点。不过,我们建议延长随访时间,并明确纳入慢性疼痛和产后抑郁的筛查。最近的研究表明,经历意外硬膜穿刺的妇女发生这两种并发症的风险都会增加[5]。我们希望,对 0.9% 盐水腔内注射、预防性治疗以及延长随访时间并筛查慢性疼痛和产后抑郁的重要性的持续研究能够进一步优化对这些患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信