How African Ungulates Respond to Tourist Vehicles in Kruger National Park

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Andrea Romero, Brian J. O'Neill, Kristen Rauch, Ashley Roscoe
{"title":"How African Ungulates Respond to Tourist Vehicles in Kruger National Park","authors":"Andrea Romero,&nbsp;Brian J. O'Neill,&nbsp;Kristen Rauch,&nbsp;Ashley Roscoe","doi":"10.1111/aje.13335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managers of protected areas need to balance how they use or preserve their resources, especially regarding ‘road ecology’. This study focuses on Kruger National Park's (KNP) common ungulates’ response to tourist vehicles. We answered the following questions for impala, zebra, giraffe, blue wildebeest, greater kudu and steenbok: What mediates animal flight and flight distance from a vehicle? How much of KNP is affected by roads? Are ungulates using or avoiding roads? We sampled 55.9% of KNP's tourist roads, where we approached animals and determined whether and how far they fled. We georeferenced sightings and estimated the amount of land area along KNP's tourist roads where animals would be expected to flee from vehicles. Of 517 animal sightings, Impala were sighted most (263) and steenbok least (32). Impala had the highest flight propensity (42.6%) and wildebeest lowest (13%). Steenbok were found closest to the road (22.13 m) and wildebeest furthest (77.6 m). Impala had the closest tolerance distance (16.63 m), with zebra furthest (44.74 m). Impala fled the least distance (9.93 m) and zebra fled furthest (24.52 m). Binary logistic regressions (BLRs) showed that all species fled more consistently when closer to the road. The amount of KNP affected by animal flight based on BLRs was largest for zebra (2.32% of the park) and smallest for kudu (0.84%). Impala used the first 10 m of the roadside more than expected and 10–20 m from the road less. KNP's ungulates are habituated to vehicles since flight propensity was low, distribution analysis showed no-road avoidance, flight distance was short, and animals &gt; 50 m from the road generally do not flee. Given the amount of KNP that is already affected by vehicle traffic, as tourism increases, the land solely devoted to wildlife will necessarily decrease. This study aims to provide information for the best management of roads and traffic in KNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.13335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.13335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managers of protected areas need to balance how they use or preserve their resources, especially regarding ‘road ecology’. This study focuses on Kruger National Park's (KNP) common ungulates’ response to tourist vehicles. We answered the following questions for impala, zebra, giraffe, blue wildebeest, greater kudu and steenbok: What mediates animal flight and flight distance from a vehicle? How much of KNP is affected by roads? Are ungulates using or avoiding roads? We sampled 55.9% of KNP's tourist roads, where we approached animals and determined whether and how far they fled. We georeferenced sightings and estimated the amount of land area along KNP's tourist roads where animals would be expected to flee from vehicles. Of 517 animal sightings, Impala were sighted most (263) and steenbok least (32). Impala had the highest flight propensity (42.6%) and wildebeest lowest (13%). Steenbok were found closest to the road (22.13 m) and wildebeest furthest (77.6 m). Impala had the closest tolerance distance (16.63 m), with zebra furthest (44.74 m). Impala fled the least distance (9.93 m) and zebra fled furthest (24.52 m). Binary logistic regressions (BLRs) showed that all species fled more consistently when closer to the road. The amount of KNP affected by animal flight based on BLRs was largest for zebra (2.32% of the park) and smallest for kudu (0.84%). Impala used the first 10 m of the roadside more than expected and 10–20 m from the road less. KNP's ungulates are habituated to vehicles since flight propensity was low, distribution analysis showed no-road avoidance, flight distance was short, and animals > 50 m from the road generally do not flee. Given the amount of KNP that is already affected by vehicle traffic, as tourism increases, the land solely devoted to wildlife will necessarily decrease. This study aims to provide information for the best management of roads and traffic in KNP.

Abstract Image

非洲有蹄类动物如何应对克鲁格国家公园的旅游车辆
保护区的管理者需要平衡如何使用或保护其资源,尤其是在 "道路生态 "方面。本研究主要关注克鲁格国家公园(KNP)常见有蹄类动物对旅游车辆的反应。我们回答了黑斑羚、斑马、长颈鹿、蓝角马、大有蹄类动物和角马的以下问题:是什么因素促成了动物的飞行和与车辆的飞行距离?受道路影响的 KNP 面积有多大?有蹄类动物是使用道路还是避开道路?我们对 55.9% 的 KNP 旅游道路进行了取样,在这些道路上我们接近动物,并确定它们是否逃离以及逃离的距离。我们对发现的动物进行了地理坐标定位,并估算了沿 KNP 旅游公路动物可能逃离车辆的土地面积。在 517 次动物目击中,黑斑羚的目击次数最多(263 次),大羚羊的目击次数最少(32 次)。黑斑羚的逃跑倾向最高(42.6%),角马最低(13%)。发现的角马离道路最近(22.13 米),而角马离道路最远(77.6 米)。黑斑羚的耐受距离最近(16.63 米),斑马最远(44.74 米)。黑斑羚逃跑距离最小(9.93 米),斑马逃跑距离最远(24.52 米)。二元逻辑回归(BLRs)显示,所有物种在靠近道路时的逃逸距离更一致。根据二元逻辑回归结果,斑马受动物逃逸影响的 KNP 面积最大(占公园面积的 2.32%),而库杜最小(占公园面积的 0.84%)。黑斑羚对路边前 10 米区域的利用率高于预期,而对路边 10-20 米区域的利用率则低于预期。KNP 的有蹄类动物对车辆习以为常,因为它们的飞行倾向很低,分布分析表明它们不会避开道路,飞行距离很短,而且距离道路 50 米的动物一般不会逃跑。鉴于 KNP 受车辆交通影响的面积已经很大,随着旅游业的发展,专门用于野生动物的土地必然会减少。本研究旨在为 KNP 的道路和交通的最佳管理提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信