Tissue Plasminogen Activator or Perfluoropropane for Submacular Hemorrhage in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Factorial Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
George S P Murphy,Azahir Saleh,Salma Ayis,Muhammad Raza Cheema,Alex Mehta,David H Steel,Luke Membrey,Mark Costen,Timothy L Jackson
{"title":"Tissue Plasminogen Activator or Perfluoropropane for Submacular Hemorrhage in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Factorial Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"George S P Murphy,Azahir Saleh,Salma Ayis,Muhammad Raza Cheema,Alex Mehta,David H Steel,Luke Membrey,Mark Costen,Timothy L Jackson","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nEvidence is limited to support therapies to treat submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) as an adjunct to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (anti-VEGF).\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo determine if intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) or gas improves visual acuity or promotes resolution of SMH secondary to neovascular AMD in eyes treated with ranibizumab.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThis was a double-masked, sham-controlled, factorial randomized clinical trial and feasibility study that recruited participants from June 2014 to March 2019, with 12 months' follow-up. Included in the trial were patients from 4 UK vitreoretinal units who had fovea-involving SMH of at least 1 disc area secondary to neovascular AMD and were evaluated within 14 days of onset.\r\n\r\nInterventions\r\nStudy eyes received baseline ranibizumab and were then randomized 2:1:1:1 to 1 of 4 intravitreal treatments: sham injection, perfluoropropane (C3F8), TPA, or combined C3F8 and TPA (C3F8 + TPA). All eyes received monthly pro re nata ranibizumab therapy over 12 months. Outcome assessors were masked to intervention assignment.\r\n\r\nMain Outcome and Measure\r\nBest-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 3.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nFifty-three of 56 participants (95%; mean [SD] age, 81.5 [8.1] years; 33 female [59%]) reached the primary end point. Study eyes were randomized to the following intravitreal treatments: sham injection (n = 23), C3F8 (n = 11), TPA (n = 11), or C3F8 + TPA (n = 11). On factorial analysis, the combined TPA groups had significantly better month 3 mean logMAR BCVA than those not receiving TPA: 0.66 vs 0.98 (μd = -0.32; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.07; P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference comparing groups that did vs did not receive C3F8: 0.80 vs 0.90 (μd = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.37 to 0.16; P = .43). The combined TPA groups were less likely to have SMH present at month 1 (10 of 18 [55.6%] vs 21 of 24 [87.5%]; P = .03), a benefit not evident in the combined gas groups. The mean logMAR BCVA at 3 months was not significantly different between the groups: monotherapy control, 0.99; C3F8, 0.97 (vs control μd = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.48 to 0.44); TPA, 0.70 (vs control μd = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.79 to 0.21); combined C3F8 and TPA, 0.71 (vs control μd = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.82 to 0.11); P = .11. No safety differences were identified across the treatment groups.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nResults of this randomized clinical trial suggest that TPA may increase the chance of visual acuity gain when added to ranibizumab therapy for neovascular AMD in eyes with SMH, warranting consideration of additional clinical trials.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01835067.","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4297","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Evidence is limited to support therapies to treat submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) as an adjunct to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (anti-VEGF). Objective To determine if intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) or gas improves visual acuity or promotes resolution of SMH secondary to neovascular AMD in eyes treated with ranibizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a double-masked, sham-controlled, factorial randomized clinical trial and feasibility study that recruited participants from June 2014 to March 2019, with 12 months' follow-up. Included in the trial were patients from 4 UK vitreoretinal units who had fovea-involving SMH of at least 1 disc area secondary to neovascular AMD and were evaluated within 14 days of onset. Interventions Study eyes received baseline ranibizumab and were then randomized 2:1:1:1 to 1 of 4 intravitreal treatments: sham injection, perfluoropropane (C3F8), TPA, or combined C3F8 and TPA (C3F8 + TPA). All eyes received monthly pro re nata ranibizumab therapy over 12 months. Outcome assessors were masked to intervention assignment. Main Outcome and Measure Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 3. Results Fifty-three of 56 participants (95%; mean [SD] age, 81.5 [8.1] years; 33 female [59%]) reached the primary end point. Study eyes were randomized to the following intravitreal treatments: sham injection (n = 23), C3F8 (n = 11), TPA (n = 11), or C3F8 + TPA (n = 11). On factorial analysis, the combined TPA groups had significantly better month 3 mean logMAR BCVA than those not receiving TPA: 0.66 vs 0.98 (μd = -0.32; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.07; P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference comparing groups that did vs did not receive C3F8: 0.80 vs 0.90 (μd = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.37 to 0.16; P = .43). The combined TPA groups were less likely to have SMH present at month 1 (10 of 18 [55.6%] vs 21 of 24 [87.5%]; P = .03), a benefit not evident in the combined gas groups. The mean logMAR BCVA at 3 months was not significantly different between the groups: monotherapy control, 0.99; C3F8, 0.97 (vs control μd = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.48 to 0.44); TPA, 0.70 (vs control μd = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.79 to 0.21); combined C3F8 and TPA, 0.71 (vs control μd = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.82 to 0.11); P = .11. No safety differences were identified across the treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that TPA may increase the chance of visual acuity gain when added to ranibizumab therapy for neovascular AMD in eyes with SMH, warranting consideration of additional clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01835067.
组织浆蛋白酶原激活剂或全氟丙烷治疗老年性黄斑变性的黄斑下出血:一项因子随机临床试验。
重要性目前支持治疗继发于新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的黄斑下出血(SMH)的疗法,作为抗血管内皮生长因子疗法(anti-VEGF)的辅助疗法的证据有限。目的确定玻璃体内组织浆蛋白酶原激活剂(TPA)或气体是否能改善视力或促进雷尼珠单抗治疗后继发于新生血管性AMD的SMH的消退。设计、设置和参与者这是一项双掩蔽、假对照、因子随机临床试验和可行性研究,从2014年6月至2019年3月招募参与者,随访12个月。纳入试验的患者来自英国 4 家玻璃体视网膜单位,他们都是继发于新生血管性 AMD 的至少 1 个盘区的眼窝受累 SMH 患者,并在发病后 14 天内接受了评估。干预措施研究眼接受基线雷尼珠单抗治疗,然后按 2:1:1:1 随机分配到 4 种玻璃体内治疗方法中的一种:假注射、全氟丙烷 (C3F8)、TPA 或 C3F8 和 TPA 联合治疗(C3F8 + TPA)。所有患者在12个月内每月接受一次雷尼珠单抗治疗。结果56名参与者中有53名(95%;平均[标码]年龄为81.5[8.1]岁;33名女性[59%])达到了主要终点。研究对象的眼睛随机接受了以下玻璃体内治疗:假注射(n = 23)、C3F8(n = 11)、TPA(n = 11)或 C3F8 + TPA(n = 11)。通过因子分析,TPA联合治疗组第3个月的平均logMAR BCVA明显优于未接受TPA治疗组:0.66 vs 0.98 (μd = -0.32; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.07; P = .02)。接受 C3F8 与未接受 C3F8 的组间比较差异无统计学意义:0.80 vs 0.90 (μd = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.37 to 0.16; P = .43)。联合 TPA 组在第 1 个月出现 SMH 的几率较低(18 例中的 10 例 [55.6%] vs 24 例中的 21 例 [87.5%];P = .03),而联合气体组的这一优势并不明显。各组 3 个月时的 BCVA 平均对数无显著差异:单药对照组,0.99;C3F8,0.97(vs 对照组 μd = -0.02;95% CI,-0.48 至 0.44);TPA,0.70(vs 对照组 μd = -0.29;95% CI,-0.79 至 0.21);C3F8 和 TPA 联合治疗组,0.71(vs 对照组 μd = -0.36;95% CI,-0.82 至 0.11);P = .11。结论和相关性这项随机临床试验的结果表明,在使用雷尼珠单抗治疗SMH患者的新生血管性AMD时,TPA可能会增加视力提高的机会,值得考虑进行更多临床试验:NCT01835067。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信