Victor De La Llana MSc , Fernando Mañeru PhD , Julián Librero MSc , Santiago Pellejero MSc , Fernando Arias MD, PhD
{"title":"Interobserver Variability in a Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) Head and Neck Course. Is Current Contouring Training Sufficient?","authors":"Victor De La Llana MSc , Fernando Mañeru PhD , Julián Librero MSc , Santiago Pellejero MSc , Fernando Arias MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>External beam radiation therapy has grown significantly, incorporating advanced techniques like intensity modulation or stereotactic treatments, which enhance precision and accuracy. Nevertheless, variability in target volume delineation by radiation oncologists remains a challenge, influencing dose distribution. This study analyzes an online training course by the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, focusing on head and neck tumor contouring, to evaluate interobserver variability.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>Eight instructors provided clinical directives for 8 head and neck pathologies. Participants contoured structures using their own treatment planning systems, emphasizing gross tumor volume and high-, medium-, and low-risk clinical target volumes (CTV) contouring. Delineation variability was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and volume relative change.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results reveal significant variability in contouring, with mean Dice similarity coefficient values ranging from 0.57 to 0.69. High-risk CTV demonstrated higher variability compared with medium-risk CTV. The presence of a gross tumor volume and supporting positron emission tomography/computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging studies did not significantly improve the concordance. Parotid cases exhibited the greatest differences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the introduction of new automatic tools, this study points to the need for uniform contouring criteria. Training and standardization efforts are essential to enhance radiation therapy treatment consistency and quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
External beam radiation therapy has grown significantly, incorporating advanced techniques like intensity modulation or stereotactic treatments, which enhance precision and accuracy. Nevertheless, variability in target volume delineation by radiation oncologists remains a challenge, influencing dose distribution. This study analyzes an online training course by the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, focusing on head and neck tumor contouring, to evaluate interobserver variability.
Material and Methods
Eight instructors provided clinical directives for 8 head and neck pathologies. Participants contoured structures using their own treatment planning systems, emphasizing gross tumor volume and high-, medium-, and low-risk clinical target volumes (CTV) contouring. Delineation variability was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and volume relative change.
Results
The results reveal significant variability in contouring, with mean Dice similarity coefficient values ranging from 0.57 to 0.69. High-risk CTV demonstrated higher variability compared with medium-risk CTV. The presence of a gross tumor volume and supporting positron emission tomography/computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging studies did not significantly improve the concordance. Parotid cases exhibited the greatest differences.
Conclusions
Despite the introduction of new automatic tools, this study points to the need for uniform contouring criteria. Training and standardization efforts are essential to enhance radiation therapy treatment consistency and quality.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.