Closing the Gaps in Hepatitis C Knowledge Among Internal Medicine Residents in the United States

Lucy X. Li , Jessica S. Lin , Sean Tackett , Amanda Bertram , Stephen D. Sisson , Darius Rastegar , Megan E. Buresh
{"title":"Closing the Gaps in Hepatitis C Knowledge Among Internal Medicine Residents in the United States","authors":"Lucy X. Li ,&nbsp;Jessica S. Lin ,&nbsp;Sean Tackett ,&nbsp;Amanda Bertram ,&nbsp;Stephen D. Sisson ,&nbsp;Darius Rastegar ,&nbsp;Megan E. Buresh","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2024.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has revolutionized hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment but has not translated into an appreciable decline in HCV prevalence, which is estimated to be 2.4 million in the United States. Efforts are thought to be limited by the lack of experience among nonspecialist providers in managing HCV. However, there have been no comprehensive surveys assessing HCV knowledge among medical trainees to determine if trends have shifted since the discovery of DAAs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective observational study of internal medicine (IM) residents in the United States (<em>n</em> = 1763) who completed the Physician Education and Assessment Center HCV learning module between 2021 and 2022. Participant pre- and post-test performance was compared with further stratified analysis by training year, geography, training program type, and local HCV prevalence using ANOVA and Chi-squared tests of proportions, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>IM residents universally lacked baseline HCV knowledge (average score ± standard deviation, 43% ± 19%); less than 50% of participants answered correctly in the majority of tested domains. There were no consistent trends in performance regardless of resident characteristic used to stratify the participants. Knowledge gaps improved after completing an online educational training module (<em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>HCV knowledge remains limited among IM residents despite expansion of treatment options. Addressing these gaps during clinical training may substantially increase the availability of HCV treatment in the community, and online modules may be one means by which to integrate these efforts into medical training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036424000141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has revolutionized hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment but has not translated into an appreciable decline in HCV prevalence, which is estimated to be 2.4 million in the United States. Efforts are thought to be limited by the lack of experience among nonspecialist providers in managing HCV. However, there have been no comprehensive surveys assessing HCV knowledge among medical trainees to determine if trends have shifted since the discovery of DAAs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study of internal medicine (IM) residents in the United States (n = 1763) who completed the Physician Education and Assessment Center HCV learning module between 2021 and 2022. Participant pre- and post-test performance was compared with further stratified analysis by training year, geography, training program type, and local HCV prevalence using ANOVA and Chi-squared tests of proportions, respectively.

Results

IM residents universally lacked baseline HCV knowledge (average score ± standard deviation, 43% ± 19%); less than 50% of participants answered correctly in the majority of tested domains. There were no consistent trends in performance regardless of resident characteristic used to stratify the participants. Knowledge gaps improved after completing an online educational training module (P < .001).

Conclusions

HCV knowledge remains limited among IM residents despite expansion of treatment options. Addressing these gaps during clinical training may substantially increase the availability of HCV treatment in the community, and online modules may be one means by which to integrate these efforts into medical training.
缩小美国内科住院医生在丙型肝炎知识方面的差距
背景直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)的引入彻底改变了丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的治疗,但并没有明显降低 HCV 的发病率,据估计美国的发病率为 240 万。人们认为,非专业医疗服务提供者在管理 HCV 方面缺乏经验,从而限制了这方面的努力。我们对 2021 年至 2022 年期间完成医生教育和评估中心 HCV 学习模块的美国内科住院医师(n = 1763)进行了一项回顾性观察研究。结果IM住院医师普遍缺乏HCV基础知识(平均分±标准差,43%±19%);在大多数测试领域中,只有不到50%的参与者回答正确。无论采用哪种居民特征对参与者进行分层,结果都没有一致的趋势。完成在线教育培训模块后,知识差距有所改善(P < .001)。在临床培训过程中弥补这些不足可能会大大增加社区中 HCV 治疗的可用性,而在线模块可能是将这些努力纳入医学培训的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信