Incremental Prognostic Value of a Coronary Heart Disease Polygenic Risk Score in Type 2 Diabetes

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1489
Ify R. Mordi, Ivy Li, Gittu George, Rory J. McCrimmon, Colin N. Palmer, Ewan R. Pearson, Chim C. Lang, Alex S. Doney
{"title":"Incremental Prognostic Value of a Coronary Heart Disease Polygenic Risk Score in Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Ify R. Mordi, Ivy Li, Gittu George, Rory J. McCrimmon, Colin N. Palmer, Ewan R. Pearson, Chim C. Lang, Alex S. Doney","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The recent availability of cardiovascular risk-reducing type 2 diabetes (T2D) therapies makes it imperative to optimally identify individuals who could derive benefit. Current clinical risk prediction may misclassify individuals as low risk and could be improved. Our aim was to determine the incremental prognostic value of a coronary heart disease (CHD) genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) to a clinical risk score in prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with T2D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We evaluated 10,556 individuals with T2D aged 40–79 without a prior cardiovascular hospitalization. We calculated 10-year clinical cardiovascular risk at the date of recruitment using the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE Risk) and constructed a CHD PRS. The primary outcome was time to first MACE incidence, and we assessed the additional incremental predictive value of the CHD PRS to the PCE risk. RESULTS At 10 years, there were 1,477 MACE. After adjustment for clinical risk, the CHD PRS was significantly associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69 per SD increase, 95% CI 1.60–1.79). Individuals with PCE Risk <7.5% but in the top quintile of CHD PRS had a significantly increased likelihood of MACE (HR 10.69, 95% CI 5.07–22.55) compared with those in the lowest. The addition of the PRS to the clinical risk score led to significant improvements in risk prediction, particularly in those at low clinical risk. CONCLUSIONS The addition of a CHD PRS to clinical assessment improved MACE prediction in T2D individuals without prior cardiovascular disease, particularly in those at low clinical risk.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The recent availability of cardiovascular risk-reducing type 2 diabetes (T2D) therapies makes it imperative to optimally identify individuals who could derive benefit. Current clinical risk prediction may misclassify individuals as low risk and could be improved. Our aim was to determine the incremental prognostic value of a coronary heart disease (CHD) genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) to a clinical risk score in prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with T2D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We evaluated 10,556 individuals with T2D aged 40–79 without a prior cardiovascular hospitalization. We calculated 10-year clinical cardiovascular risk at the date of recruitment using the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE Risk) and constructed a CHD PRS. The primary outcome was time to first MACE incidence, and we assessed the additional incremental predictive value of the CHD PRS to the PCE risk. RESULTS At 10 years, there were 1,477 MACE. After adjustment for clinical risk, the CHD PRS was significantly associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69 per SD increase, 95% CI 1.60–1.79). Individuals with PCE Risk <7.5% but in the top quintile of CHD PRS had a significantly increased likelihood of MACE (HR 10.69, 95% CI 5.07–22.55) compared with those in the lowest. The addition of the PRS to the clinical risk score led to significant improvements in risk prediction, particularly in those at low clinical risk. CONCLUSIONS The addition of a CHD PRS to clinical assessment improved MACE prediction in T2D individuals without prior cardiovascular disease, particularly in those at low clinical risk.
2 型糖尿病患者冠心病多基因风险评分的增量预后价值
目的 最近出现了可降低心血管风险的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)疗法,因此必须以最佳方式识别可从中获益的患者。目前的临床风险预测可能会将一些人误认为是低风险患者,因此需要加以改进。我们的目的是确定冠心病(CHD)全基因组多基因风险评分(PRS)与临床风险评分在预测 T2D 患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)方面的增量预后价值。研究设计与方法 我们对 10556 名年龄在 40-79 岁之间、既往未因心血管疾病住院治疗的 T2D 患者进行了评估。我们使用集合队列方程(PCE Risk)计算了招募时的 10 年临床心血管风险,并构建了 CHD PRS。主要结果是首次 MACE 发生的时间,我们评估了 CHD PRS 对 PCE 风险的额外增量预测价值。结果 10 年内共发生 1,477 例 MACE。在对临床风险进行调整后,CHD PRS 与 MACE 显著相关(每增加 SD 的危险比 [HR] 为 1.69,95% CI 为 1.60-1.79)。PCE风险<7.5%但处于CHD PRS最高五分位的个体与处于最低五分位的个体相比,发生MACE的可能性显著增加(HR 10.69,95% CI 5.07-22.55)。在临床风险评分的基础上增加 PRS 可显著提高风险预测能力,尤其是对临床风险较低的人群。结论 在临床评估中加入 CHD PRS 可改善对既往无心血管疾病的 T2D 患者的 MACE 预测,尤其是对临床风险较低的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信