MRI findings and clinical testing for preoperative diagnosis of long head of the biceps pathology

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
David Gallinet, Maxime Antoni, ReSurg, Julien Berhouet, Christophe Charousset, Jacques Guery
{"title":"MRI findings and clinical testing for preoperative diagnosis of long head of the biceps pathology","authors":"David Gallinet,&nbsp;Maxime Antoni,&nbsp;ReSurg,&nbsp;Julien Berhouet,&nbsp;Christophe Charousset,&nbsp;Jacques Guery","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Determine whether combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) observations and clinical tests could substantially improve sensitivity for diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The authors retrospectively assessed a consecutive series of 140 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for isolated supraspinatus tears. The presence of LHBT pathology was assessed preoperatively on MRI using three criteria and four clinical tests specific to shoulder injuries. Binary outcomes of MRI observations and four clinical tests were combined to identify combinations resulting in the best sensitivity using intra-operative arthroscopic findings as reference.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study cohort comprised 100 shoulders (58 men and 42 women) aged 56.6 ± 9.4 years (range, 30–76) at index surgery. A total of 29 combinations were tested to obtain the best diagnostic algorithm for LHBT pathologies. Only four combinations reached a sensitivity ≥0.75, but had a specificity &lt;0.45. The ‘Speed or Signal’ combination achieved the highest sensitivity (Se: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73%–0.96%; Sp: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.10%–0.33%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The most important findings of this study were that, for the diagnosis of LHBT pathology using clinical tests alone, the Speed test had the highest sensitivity (Se, 0.74), and using MRI observations alone, the signal intensity had the highest sensitivity (Se, 0.68). Combination of ‘Speed test or Signal intensity’ substantially improved the sensitivity (Se, 0.88) but yielded the lowest specificity (Sp, 0.20). The clinical relevance of these findings is that using the combination ‘Speed or Signal’ for preoperative diagnosis, 88% of pathologic LHBTs would be correctly diagnosed, while 80% of healthy LHBTs could be misdiagnosed as pathologic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic study, Level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Determine whether combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) observations and clinical tests could substantially improve sensitivity for diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology.

Methods

The authors retrospectively assessed a consecutive series of 140 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for isolated supraspinatus tears. The presence of LHBT pathology was assessed preoperatively on MRI using three criteria and four clinical tests specific to shoulder injuries. Binary outcomes of MRI observations and four clinical tests were combined to identify combinations resulting in the best sensitivity using intra-operative arthroscopic findings as reference.

Results

The study cohort comprised 100 shoulders (58 men and 42 women) aged 56.6 ± 9.4 years (range, 30–76) at index surgery. A total of 29 combinations were tested to obtain the best diagnostic algorithm for LHBT pathologies. Only four combinations reached a sensitivity ≥0.75, but had a specificity <0.45. The ‘Speed or Signal’ combination achieved the highest sensitivity (Se: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73%–0.96%; Sp: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.10%–0.33%).

Conclusion

The most important findings of this study were that, for the diagnosis of LHBT pathology using clinical tests alone, the Speed test had the highest sensitivity (Se, 0.74), and using MRI observations alone, the signal intensity had the highest sensitivity (Se, 0.68). Combination of ‘Speed test or Signal intensity’ substantially improved the sensitivity (Se, 0.88) but yielded the lowest specificity (Sp, 0.20). The clinical relevance of these findings is that using the combination ‘Speed or Signal’ for preoperative diagnosis, 88% of pathologic LHBTs would be correctly diagnosed, while 80% of healthy LHBTs could be misdiagnosed as pathologic.

Level of Evidence

Diagnostic study, Level IV.

Abstract Image

肱二头肌长头病变术前诊断的核磁共振成像结果和临床测试
目的 探讨将磁共振成像(MRI)观察结果与临床测试相结合是否能大幅提高肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHBT)病变诊断的灵敏度。 方法 作者回顾性评估了因孤立性冈上肌撕裂而接受关节镜肩袖修复术的 140 例连续患者。术前通过核磁共振成像评估是否存在 LHBT 病变,评估采用了三项标准和四项肩部损伤特有的临床测试。将 MRI 观察结果和四项临床测试的二进制结果结合起来,以术中关节镜检查结果为参考,确定灵敏度最高的组合。 结果 研究队列包括 100 个肩关节(58 名男性和 42 名女性),年龄为 56.6 ± 9.4 岁(30-76 岁)。共测试了 29 种组合,以获得 LHBT 病变的最佳诊断算法。只有四种组合的灵敏度≥0.75,但特异性为 0.45。速度或信号 "组合的灵敏度最高(Se:0.88;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.73%-0.96%;Sp:0.20;95% 置信区间:0.10%-0.33%)。 结论 本研究最重要的发现是,仅使用临床测试诊断 LHBT 病变,速度测试的灵敏度最高(Se,0.74);仅使用 MRI 观察,信号强度的灵敏度最高(Se,0.68)。结合使用 "速度测试或信号强度 "可大幅提高灵敏度(Se,0.88),但特异性最低(Sp,0.20)。这些发现的临床意义在于,使用 "速度或信号 "组合进行术前诊断,88% 的病理 LHBT 可以得到正确诊断,而 80% 的健康 LHBT 可能会被误诊为病理。 证据级别 诊断研究,IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信