Implementation of an EMS-based naloxone distribution program: A qualitative evaluation

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emily E. Ager MD, MPH, Ella K. Purington MD, Megan H. Purdy MD, Brian Benenati MD, Jessica E. Baker BS, Christine Jane Schellack MD, Graham C. Smith MD, Nathaniel R. Hunt MD, Eve D. Losman MD, MHSA
{"title":"Implementation of an EMS-based naloxone distribution program: A qualitative evaluation","authors":"Emily E. Ager MD, MPH,&nbsp;Ella K. Purington MD,&nbsp;Megan H. Purdy MD,&nbsp;Brian Benenati MD,&nbsp;Jessica E. Baker BS,&nbsp;Christine Jane Schellack MD,&nbsp;Graham C. Smith MD,&nbsp;Nathaniel R. Hunt MD,&nbsp;Eve D. Losman MD, MHSA","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated a novel leave-behind naloxone (LBN) program that allows Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel to distribute naloxone after an opioid overdose. Our objective was to explore EMS engagement and experiences with the program, as well as interest in education on addiction and harm reduction. We also assessed the acceptability of LBN programs among people who use drugs (PWUD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted telephone interviews with EMS personnel and residents of substance use recovery housing between February and September 2023. EMS personnel described their direct experiences with the LBN program and perceived facilitating factors and barriers to naloxone distribution. First responder interactions and support for LBN were explored with PWUD. A rapid assessment method was used to analyze the interview data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen of the 23 EMS participants had distributed LBN; most agreed EMS agencies should have an LBN program. Barriers included forgetting, patient acuity, patients declining, and perceived liability. Facilitators included having a clear protocol, accessible kits, and minimal documentation burden. The majority expressed interest in harm reduction education. Eight of the 11 PWUD participants reported recent involvement in an opioid overdose. The majority supported LBN and felt comfortable receiving naloxone training from EMS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this qualitative evaluation, we found broad support for EMS-based naloxone distribution among EMS personnel and PWUD. We identified several modifiable barriers to the success of such programs, which should be the subject of future investigation. EMS and harm reduction communities should support the expansion of LBN programs across the United States.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We evaluated a novel leave-behind naloxone (LBN) program that allows Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel to distribute naloxone after an opioid overdose. Our objective was to explore EMS engagement and experiences with the program, as well as interest in education on addiction and harm reduction. We also assessed the acceptability of LBN programs among people who use drugs (PWUD).

Methods

We conducted telephone interviews with EMS personnel and residents of substance use recovery housing between February and September 2023. EMS personnel described their direct experiences with the LBN program and perceived facilitating factors and barriers to naloxone distribution. First responder interactions and support for LBN were explored with PWUD. A rapid assessment method was used to analyze the interview data.

Results

Eighteen of the 23 EMS participants had distributed LBN; most agreed EMS agencies should have an LBN program. Barriers included forgetting, patient acuity, patients declining, and perceived liability. Facilitators included having a clear protocol, accessible kits, and minimal documentation burden. The majority expressed interest in harm reduction education. Eight of the 11 PWUD participants reported recent involvement in an opioid overdose. The majority supported LBN and felt comfortable receiving naloxone training from EMS.

Conclusion

In this qualitative evaluation, we found broad support for EMS-based naloxone distribution among EMS personnel and PWUD. We identified several modifiable barriers to the success of such programs, which should be the subject of future investigation. EMS and harm reduction communities should support the expansion of LBN programs across the United States.

实施基于急救服务的纳洛酮分发计划:定性评估
目的 我们评估了一项新颖的留置纳洛酮(LBN)计划,该计划允许紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员在阿片类药物过量后分发纳洛酮。我们的目标是探索急救医疗服务人员对该计划的参与度和经验,以及对成瘾和减低伤害教育的兴趣。我们还评估了吸毒者(PWUD)对 LBN 项目的接受程度。 方法 我们在 2023 年 2 月至 9 月期间对急救人员和药物使用康复住房的居民进行了电话采访。急救人员描述了他们与 LBN 项目的直接经验,以及他们认为的纳洛酮分发的促进因素和障碍。他们还与吸毒者和残疾人探讨了急救人员与 LBN 的互动以及对 LBN 的支持。访谈数据采用快速评估法进行分析。 结果 23 名急救医疗服务参与者中有 18 人曾分发过 LBN;大多数人同意急救医疗服务机构应制定 LBN 计划。阻碍因素包括遗忘、患者病情危重、患者病情恶化以及责任感。促进因素包括有明确的协议、可获得的工具包以及最小的文件负担。大多数人表示对减低伤害教育感兴趣。在 11 名残疾人参与者中,有 8 人表示最近曾参与过阿片类药物过量事件。大多数人支持 LBN,并对接受 EMS 提供的纳洛酮培训感到放心。 结论 在这项定性评估中,我们发现急救人员和残疾人中广泛支持基于急救服务的纳洛酮分发。我们发现了阻碍此类计划取得成功的几个可改变的障碍,这些障碍应成为未来调查的主题。急救服务和减低伤害团体应支持在全美推广 LBN 计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信