Rujia Dai , Ming Zhang , Tianyao Chu , Richard Kopp , Chunling Zhang , Kefu Liu , Yue Wang , Xusheng Wang , Chao Chen , Chunyu Liu
{"title":"PRECISION AND ACCURACY IN SINGLE-CELL RNA-SEQ","authors":"Rujia Dai , Ming Zhang , Tianyao Chu , Richard Kopp , Chunling Zhang , Kefu Liu , Yue Wang , Xusheng Wang , Chao Chen , Chunyu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.08.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Single-cell/nuclei RNA sequencing (sc/snRNA-seq) is widely used for profiling cell-type gene expression in brain research. An important but frequently underappreciated issue is the data quality in terms of precision and accuracy. We evaluated precision using data from 14 human brain studies with a total of 3,483,905 cells from 297 individuals, with technical replicates based on random grouping of cells of the same type from the same individual. We also evaluated accuracy with sample-matched scRNA-seq and pooled-cell RNA-seq data of cultured mononuclear phagocytes from four species. Low precision and accuracy at the single-cell level across all evaluated data were observed. Cell number was highlighted as a key factor determining the expression precision, accuracy, and reproducibility of differential expression analysis in sc/snRNA-seq. A high missing rate is likely the cause of the quantification quality problem. Downstream analysis results are severely affected by the expression quality issue. Many false findings can be produced when the noises are not properly controlled. This study underscores the necessity of sequencing enough cells per cell type per individual, preferably in the hundreds, to mitigate noise in expression quantification. Pseudo-bulk aggregation of expression data over cells of the same type is required when the high-quality expression quantification is desired.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12049,"journal":{"name":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"87 ","pages":"Page 21"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924977X24002530","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Single-cell/nuclei RNA sequencing (sc/snRNA-seq) is widely used for profiling cell-type gene expression in brain research. An important but frequently underappreciated issue is the data quality in terms of precision and accuracy. We evaluated precision using data from 14 human brain studies with a total of 3,483,905 cells from 297 individuals, with technical replicates based on random grouping of cells of the same type from the same individual. We also evaluated accuracy with sample-matched scRNA-seq and pooled-cell RNA-seq data of cultured mononuclear phagocytes from four species. Low precision and accuracy at the single-cell level across all evaluated data were observed. Cell number was highlighted as a key factor determining the expression precision, accuracy, and reproducibility of differential expression analysis in sc/snRNA-seq. A high missing rate is likely the cause of the quantification quality problem. Downstream analysis results are severely affected by the expression quality issue. Many false findings can be produced when the noises are not properly controlled. This study underscores the necessity of sequencing enough cells per cell type per individual, preferably in the hundreds, to mitigate noise in expression quantification. Pseudo-bulk aggregation of expression data over cells of the same type is required when the high-quality expression quantification is desired.
期刊介绍:
European Neuropsychopharmacology is the official publication of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP). In accordance with the mission of the College, the journal focuses on clinical and basic science contributions that advance our understanding of brain function and human behaviour and enable translation into improved treatments and enhanced public health impact in psychiatry. Recent years have been characterized by exciting advances in basic knowledge and available experimental techniques in neuroscience and genomics. However, clinical translation of these findings has not been as rapid. The journal aims to narrow this gap by promoting findings that are expected to have a major impact on both our understanding of the biological bases of mental disorders and the development and improvement of treatments, ideally paving the way for prevention and recovery.