Biomechanical and clinical outcomes after distal biceps tendon reattachment using an endo button technique and an interference screw

Q4 Medicine
Antoine Vanderlinden MD , Romain Carlat MD , Bruno Vincent MD , Christine Detrembleur PhD , Serge Ayong MD
{"title":"Biomechanical and clinical outcomes after distal biceps tendon reattachment using an endo button technique and an interference screw","authors":"Antoine Vanderlinden MD ,&nbsp;Romain Carlat MD ,&nbsp;Bruno Vincent MD ,&nbsp;Christine Detrembleur PhD ,&nbsp;Serge Ayong MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rupture of the long head of the distal bifid biceps tendon is a rare injury, for which surgical anatomical repair should be considered in active patients. The aim of this study was to review our patients who benefited from the EndoButton technique via a single anterior approach, comparing the clinical outcomes with the contralateral uninjured side and assessing their quality of life. Our hypothesis was that an “anatomical” insertion, through an anterior approach, by reinserting the 2 distinct tendons on the radial tuberosity, would restore the supination ability of the forearm more effectively than flexion strength.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included 25 patients who underwent surgery between June 2015 and January 2021. All patients underwent distal biceps reattachment using an endo-osseous fixation technique with the same device. Each patient completed a quality-of-life questionnaire and participated in biomechanical performance tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We observed a significant 14% reduction in strength during flexion on the operated side compared to the healthy side. However, no significant differences in strength were found for supination, extension, and pronation between the operated and nonoperated limbs in these same patients. In terms of endurance, flexion on the operated side tended to exhibit greater endurance than on the healthy side, while endurance in supination appeared similar between the operated and healthy sides. This finding held irrespective of whether the operated limb was dominant or nondominant. We also discovered a strong correlation between the time elapsed since surgery and differences in strength during both flexion and supination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ultimate goal is to achieve an anatomical surgical repair to restore all functions and maximize patient outcomes. As demonstrated, we have obtained good clinical results with EndoButton repair and a single anterior approach. The results in terms of strength and endurance are similar to those reported in the literature, and all our patients are satisfied. No postoperative complications were found.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 743-749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663912400110X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rupture of the long head of the distal bifid biceps tendon is a rare injury, for which surgical anatomical repair should be considered in active patients. The aim of this study was to review our patients who benefited from the EndoButton technique via a single anterior approach, comparing the clinical outcomes with the contralateral uninjured side and assessing their quality of life. Our hypothesis was that an “anatomical” insertion, through an anterior approach, by reinserting the 2 distinct tendons on the radial tuberosity, would restore the supination ability of the forearm more effectively than flexion strength.

Methods

This study included 25 patients who underwent surgery between June 2015 and January 2021. All patients underwent distal biceps reattachment using an endo-osseous fixation technique with the same device. Each patient completed a quality-of-life questionnaire and participated in biomechanical performance tests.

Results

We observed a significant 14% reduction in strength during flexion on the operated side compared to the healthy side. However, no significant differences in strength were found for supination, extension, and pronation between the operated and nonoperated limbs in these same patients. In terms of endurance, flexion on the operated side tended to exhibit greater endurance than on the healthy side, while endurance in supination appeared similar between the operated and healthy sides. This finding held irrespective of whether the operated limb was dominant or nondominant. We also discovered a strong correlation between the time elapsed since surgery and differences in strength during both flexion and supination.

Conclusion

The ultimate goal is to achieve an anatomical surgical repair to restore all functions and maximize patient outcomes. As demonstrated, we have obtained good clinical results with EndoButton repair and a single anterior approach. The results in terms of strength and endurance are similar to those reported in the literature, and all our patients are satisfied. No postoperative complications were found.
使用内扣技术和干扰螺钉进行肱二头肌远端肌腱再接合后的生物力学和临床效果
背景肱二头肌远端二裂肌腱长头断裂是一种罕见的损伤,活动期患者应考虑进行手术解剖修复。本研究的目的是回顾通过单一前方入路采用 EndoButton 技术的患者,比较他们与未受伤的对侧患者的临床效果,并评估他们的生活质量。我们的假设是,通过桡骨结节上的 2 条不同肌腱重新插入桡骨结节,从前方入路进行 "解剖 "插入,将比屈曲力量更有效地恢复前臂的上举能力。方法本研究纳入了在 2015 年 6 月至 2021 年 1 月期间接受手术的 25 名患者。所有患者都接受了肱二头肌远端再接术,使用的是同一装置的骨内固定技术。每位患者都填写了一份生活质量调查问卷,并参加了生物力学性能测试。然而,在这些患者中,手术侧和非手术侧肢体的上举、伸展和前伸力量没有明显差异。在耐力方面,手术侧屈曲的耐力往往高于健侧,而手术侧和健侧的上举耐力似乎相似。无论手术肢体是优势肢体还是非优势肢体,这一结论都是成立的。我们还发现,手术后的时间与屈伸和上举时的力量差异之间存在密切联系。正如所展示的那样,我们采用 EndoButton 修复术和单一前路方法取得了良好的临床效果。在力量和耐力方面的效果与文献报道相似,所有患者都感到满意。术后未发现并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信