The effect of preemptive middle glenohumeral ligament release, following release of the rotator interval and coracohumeral ligament, in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of small- to medium-sized tears to prevent postoperative stiffness: a retrospective comparative study

Q4 Medicine
Ryosuke Takahashi MD , Ryosuke Sagami MD , Yohei Harada MD, PhD , Yukihiro Kajita MD, PhD
{"title":"The effect of preemptive middle glenohumeral ligament release, following release of the rotator interval and coracohumeral ligament, in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of small- to medium-sized tears to prevent postoperative stiffness: a retrospective comparative study","authors":"Ryosuke Takahashi MD ,&nbsp;Ryosuke Sagami MD ,&nbsp;Yohei Harada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukihiro Kajita MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL) release during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of small- to medium-sized tears to prevent postoperative stiffness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent ARCR of small- to medium-sized tears were enrolled and allocated into 2 groups retrospectively: the pre-emptive MGHL release group (MGHL+ group, n = 34) and pre-emptive MGHL nonrelease group (MGHL− group, n = 32). The rotator interval and coracohumeral ligament release were performed in all patients with or without MGHL release in both groups. Clinical outcomes including the range of motion; Constant Shoulder score; and the University of California, Los Angeles score preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively and complications were assessed and compared between the 2 groups. The integrity of the repaired tendon was assessed at the 12-month follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The MGHL+ group showed a significantly higher external rotation; Constant Shoulder score; and the University of California, Los Angeles score than the MGHL− group at 6 months postoperatively (<em>P</em> = .03, &lt;.001, .01, respectively). The range of motion and functional scores were not significantly different between the groups at 3 and 12 months postoperatively (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). The retear rate, postoperative stiffness, and postoperative instability were not significantly different between the groups (all, <em>P</em> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pre-emptive MGHL release in ARCR of small- to medium-sized tears could be an effective method to prevent early postoperative shoulder stiffness but does not significantly change the overall clinical outcome after ARCR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 774-778"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124001147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL) release during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of small- to medium-sized tears to prevent postoperative stiffness.

Methods

Patients who underwent ARCR of small- to medium-sized tears were enrolled and allocated into 2 groups retrospectively: the pre-emptive MGHL release group (MGHL+ group, n = 34) and pre-emptive MGHL nonrelease group (MGHL− group, n = 32). The rotator interval and coracohumeral ligament release were performed in all patients with or without MGHL release in both groups. Clinical outcomes including the range of motion; Constant Shoulder score; and the University of California, Los Angeles score preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively and complications were assessed and compared between the 2 groups. The integrity of the repaired tendon was assessed at the 12-month follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

The MGHL+ group showed a significantly higher external rotation; Constant Shoulder score; and the University of California, Los Angeles score than the MGHL− group at 6 months postoperatively (P = .03, <.001, .01, respectively). The range of motion and functional scores were not significantly different between the groups at 3 and 12 months postoperatively (P > .05). The retear rate, postoperative stiffness, and postoperative instability were not significantly different between the groups (all, P > .05).

Conclusion

Pre-emptive MGHL release in ARCR of small- to medium-sized tears could be an effective method to prevent early postoperative shoulder stiffness but does not significantly change the overall clinical outcome after ARCR.
在对中小型撕裂进行肩袖关节镜修复时,在松解旋转肌间隙和冠状肱韧带后先行松解中间盂肱韧带以防止术后僵硬的效果:一项回顾性比较研究
背景本研究旨在评估在关节镜下肩袖修复术(ARCR)中对中小型撕裂进行先期中间盂肱韧带(MGHL)松解以防止术后僵硬的疗效。方法对接受ARCR的中小型撕裂患者进行登记,并回顾性地将其分为两组:先期MGHL松解组(MGHL+组,34人)和先期MGHL非松解组(MGHL-组,32人)。两组患者均进行了转子间隙和冠状肱韧带松解术,无论是否进行了MGHL松解术。两组患者的临床结果包括术前、术后3个月、6个月和12个月的活动范围、恒定肩关节评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校评分,并对并发症进行了评估和比较。结果术后6个月时,MGHL+组的外旋度、恒定肩关节评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校评分明显高于MGHL-组(P = .03、<.001、.01)。术后3个月和12个月时,两组的活动范围和功能评分无明显差异(P = .05)。结论在中小型撕裂的 ARCR 中预先松解 MGHL 可以有效预防术后早期肩关节僵硬,但不会明显改变 ARCR 术后的整体临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信